What is a pro-life?

Okay, there. I'm done with my post.

WHAT DO YOU REALY THINK ABOUT THIS:
what about a man who has committed several crimes ,who has killed people ,who has taken lives who has (and i know you don't care how guilty is he) but how should we punish someone like him. you see the punishment is not just to revange no it's to stop people from committing such crimes so when someone know that if he killed that man that he realy hates or he's gonna get a lot of money if he killed him when he knows that very well, would he do it? and would it make any different if he knew that he would spend a lot of time in prison and may get out after 20 years,would it??
you see the hard punishment is gonna stop people or minimize this kind of crimes. the man that is punished like this is the man who didn't respect the life of someone the soul,the family and the dreams that he had ?so does he deserve to keep them?and WHY? what should we do about such a person??
some times life forces us to make such a decision.
Click to expand...

Wow. That's good point questions. Well, I suck at explain or giving a good answer. But, I'll do my best. ha :)

If a person do a such worser thing, I believe a person should be put to in jail for LIFE, 25 years, 15 years, or I dont know how many years but it's depend. Well, it's also depend on age. Yes, what's about the younger people? Because, some people are so younger like 14 to 18 and have do horrible things, so their lives should be void for putting them to death? Because some teens were died at premused 15 (i think) to 18 of age by the death plenty. I think it's too much power, too young to be die, and unfair. But, hey, it's my opinion. But if a person is still in JAIL and had many break rules, then a person should to learn a lesson, otherwise, he/she could waste his/her times.
Well, I feel like... if a person breaks a law for any vile reason, and to put him or her in a jail for depend on how many years. After years passed, he/she comes out of a jail but If he or she do it again, it have to put him or her in a jail again for LIFE or maybe other more years. Or a kind of different sitatution should be good reason for putting him/her in a jail, FOR YEARS OR PROBABLY FOR LIFE, it's depend. Not just to give them a death plenty as viod lives...

However... ONE PROBLEM.
Some people are innocent but they are accused by others as guilty which is actually happen in LIVE. I am totally sorry for them who were void by putting them to death while they WERE innocent. How's about? Gee? :[ That's one problem... So, I never believe in laws have to make his or her life to be viod for the death no matter how they are guilty or not... no matter how old they are... Because it's too much.

That's what i learned from tv news, internets, and some kind of books. I am also doing self-taught for learning whatever I want to know about. :) So, I just share with you with my simple opinion.

(and i know you don't care how guilty is he)
Click to expand...

Whoa. That's a little bit of harsh sentence for my taste. lol Well, I am postively believe in a person should put in a jail, but if a person is still in JAIL and had many break rules and then I'm pretty sure there is good reason to give him a delpaice (sp) like a serious warning, y'know? Sorry, I'm not good at vocaboraty. =P So.. I expect a person learns a lesson during a jail period. Like I said... when a person gets out of jail anddd... If he or she do it again, it have to put him or her in a jail again for LIFE or other years. Why? A person wastes his or her time for doing a such stupid thing. He/she should know better than anything else. :/

I gues i understood exactly what you mean, first i wanna delete something I wrote which is "i'm a hard pro-lifer" because you have a point with that.
Click to expand...

Oh no. You are not alone because some pro-lifers do support a death plenty but some of them are against animal abuse, aborton, unsafety wild forest, and many reasons for all respecting a life. So, you are still pro-lifer as long as you support a respect, love, and for all vaule of life. How's about "pro-life" instead of "true pro-life"? But, remember, it's only my opinion in #58 post. That's not means you have to follow what I say. Just no. You have to be yourself. ;)

You are a pro-life but not too pro-life.
I'm true pro-life with almost 100 precents for real.

That's make a sense to me. So.. am I clear? I hope so. And, your questions that you asked me are VERY good point, definitely awesome questions you made. :)

I dont mind you can ask me more some questions. I'll glad for it!
 
Last edited:
I'm a pro-lifer but I do not support death plenty at all....
 
Angel said:
I'm a pro-lifer but I do not support death plenty at all....
Click to expand...

I know your posts in the past that you are against war. I beleive that you are still against war.

If yes, then you are a full true pro-lifer.
 
Angel said:
I'm a pro-lifer but I do not support death plenty at all....
Click to expand...

It's means FOR LIFE. :)

Tell me, what are you against?

I know you are against the death plenty and abortion. But what about more? :) j/c (just curious)
 
Mann_K05 said:
It's means FOR LIFE. :)

Tell me, what are you against?

I know you are against the death plenty and abortion. But what about more? :) j/c (just curious)
Click to expand...


I'm against child, spousal and animal abuse, people owning guns for protections when there are children in the housholder..ALSO I'm not sure if you are aware of the Terri Schiavo's case but here's what I'm against even I I am not a medical doctor, and I do not evaluate human brain but I don't believe people or the governement have the right to make life and death decisions for a patient that is in vegetable state and still breathing on their own without any life support machine that is keeping them alive..If Terri had a living will , then it would have been a entirly different story and I wouldn't have made a big fuss over this but I think it is sooo cruel to have someone die slowly of starvation, without any food and water for days... :sigh:
 
Liebling:-))) said:
I know your posts in the past that you are against war. I beleive that you are still against war.

If yes, then you are a full true pro-lifer.
Click to expand...

I'm sorry I didn't see your post earlier until someone IM me and told me that I did, yep you're correct, I don't support no wars...
 
Angel said:
I'm against child, spousal and animal abuse, people owning guns for protections when there are children in the housholder..ALSO I'm not sure if you are aware of the Terri Schiavo's case but here's what I'm against even I I am not a medical doctor, and I do not evaluate human brain but I don't believe people or the governement have the right to make life and death decisions for a patient that is in vegetable state and still breathing on their own without any life support machine that is keeping them alive..If Terri had a living will , then it would have been a entirly different story and I wouldn't have made a big fuss over this but I think it is sooo cruel to have someone die slowly of starvation, without any food and water for days... :sigh:
Click to expand...

Ah, yes.. I do know Terri Schiavo. I was not so surprise they did that to her.. If a peson has a physical or metal problem, or has a long coma, or a kind of serious accident on a body or else ... that's NOT means his or her life HAVE TO put him or her to death because of the physical stuff. I meant, oh com'on, how should I put a baby's life to end it if a girl or boy has a Symone Down (something)? No one is prefect. I got one story about 19 years old girl (my presumed age for her) just ended a Symome Down infant's life right after her birth about 7 or 8 years ago, I think..

I sometimes hate the way they treated them like a pet or an animal.
 
Mann_K05 said:
Ah, yes.. I do know Terri Schiavo. I was not so surprise they did that to her.. If a peson has a physical or metal problem, or has a long coma, or a kind of serious accident on a body or else ... that's NOT means his or her life HAVE TO put him or her to death because of the physical stuff. I meant, oh com'on, how should I put a baby's life to end it if a girl or boy has a Symone Down (something)? No one is prefect. I got one story about 19 years old girl (my presumed age for her) just ended a Symome Down infant's life right after her birth about 7 or 8 years ago, I think..

I sometimes hate the way they treated them like a pet or an animal.
Click to expand...


That's sad :(
 
hmm i m a prolife myself abortion should be banned in my opinion if the couple dont want ot keep the baby there is such thing as adoption agency u know,

in my opinion abortion is murder
 
SuziMaria said:
Liebling:-))) said:


Among these situations are those where the
(A)woman was raped,
her health or life (or that of the fetus) is at risk

Abortion can be solutions but not abused or a
form a birth control.
Suzi
Click to expand...


oh, true.. it's depend on any sitatuion, yeah. I honsetly never believe in poor excuses due to a lack of using B.C. I hope one day will gets much better in the future. :)
Click to expand...
 
Angel said:
That's sad :(
Click to expand...

let me tell you one more another story.. Well, it’s about abortion.. I want you to know it’s only my own opinion on that story -- so you don’t have to follow what I say or believe in what I say. ;)

1.) I got my old email from an old friend four years and a several months ago… here’s the story.

"LUFKIN, Texas -- A 19-year-old East Texas man faces a life prison sentence for causing his teenage girlfriend to miscarry twins, even though she wanted to end the pregnancy.

Gerardo Flores was accused of causing the miscarriage by stepping on his girlfriend's stomach. He was prosecuted under the state's new fetal protection law. Erica Basoria acknowledged asking Flores to help end her pregnancy. But the 17-year-old can't be prosecuted because of her legal right to abortion.
The defense contended that Basoria punched herself while Flores was stepping on her, making it impossible to tell who killed the twins. The jury reached a verdict after deliberating four hours. Because prosecutors declined to seek the death penalty in the case, Flores received the automatic life sentence."

As for my own opinion:
This story is very tragic on so many levels. I really think this story hits right at the facts on how is divided we are on abortion... Either you have a right to end an unborn child's life because it is not a human being with it's own rights or you do not. Well, you can only put an unborn child to end it life if you are a woman or an abortion providar. Anyone who kills a fetus risks hardcore jail time ... hypocritcal much? I say, the mother and father should both be spending some time in jail or possibly receiving psychatic help. But, the way these people killed those twins, it was such a conscious decision.. if they were trying to kill them, there is obviously no way they could have pretended not to know they were actually alive…And it IS hypocrtical, because the woman gets NOTHING but her boyfriend gets jail time. Thoughts?

2.) Its does apply it to the number one from above as my other opinion, up here. Because I’m not sure if that boy did want twins… I think he does. But, here’s my thought on men and abortion..

I'm also so tired of pro-abortion says that men should have "no" say in the abortion debate, or abortion in general because they can never have children. It’s very annoy me mostly. It's always made me angry that men's opinions aren't "vaild" in the abortion debate. If a man (or a boy) get a girl pregnant, and he wants the chance to raise his child by himself, but too bad, he won't be allowed to if the woman chooses to have an abortion. The child is not a mere extenion of the woman's body, I meant -- HELLO, it's the creation of two people equally!

However…

If a man is responsible for provieding for a child and, a man is also responsible for helping create a child, he should have a say in whether or not his child can be aborted. It's just very frustrating how pro-aborts completely dismiss them. Well, I still can't imagine how painful it must be to want your child, too bad, you can not able to keep your child alive. Because men are not allowed to say "NO".

Indeed, men are may be affected by abortion as well, and by gliding over this fact, pro-aborts only appear ignorant of it. Hey, it’s my opinion.. But… Abortion is a symptom of a greater problem that I believe in... yet almost “no one” wants to solve what the problem is preventing unwanted pregnancies. While pro-aborts advocate for abortions, pro-lifers might fight for real solutions as my gut feels it suppose to be.

3.) Last one -- I’m also sick of many people think pro-lifers are only Ch-ians. No… Not all ch-ians are pro-life. Not all non-ch-ians are pro-choice.

Here’s a few links…
Atheist and Agnostic Pro-Life League Homepage
Pro-Life Alliance of Gays and Lesbians
BlackGenocide.org | L.E.A.R.N. Northeast
Others that you can look in anywhere else at any internet.

Really, you don’t have to read all of them in that links. Just take your time to read those.

Now, I’m curious what’s your respond to my #77 post? :)
 
I am pro life too.

I am against abortion, capital punishment, Euthanasia(For anyone who isn't in a lot of pain and very close to death such as the disabled), war, killing animals for meat, vivisection, shelters that kill animals instead of finding homes for them, and the killing of wildlife because we can't be bothered to spray neuter and release to control population that way.

I also happen to be vegan.
 
Many of you have got it right. Pro-life means pro-all life. place themselves I have always found it a paradoxical situation that the more liberal pro-choice group supports abortion but opposes the dealth penalty, while the more conservative pro-life group opposes abortion but supports the death penalty. If life is sacred from the moment of conception, doesn't it remain so throughout the entire life, or does it cease to be sacred once the individual has become an adult?
 
If the taking of innocent life isn't punished severely, then the victims' lives are devalued. It is because I value the lives of innocent victims that I support the severest penalties lawfully possible against those who take innocent life.

It's not just a matter of age. It's a matter of innocence and guilt, victim and perpetrator.

It's a death penalty--that is, punishment for committing serious harm to another person.

I'm pro protecting innocent life, thru legislation, thru severe punishment for criminal acts, thru self defense, and thru national defense.
 
Back
Top