What if there is NO WAR?

Well, any army in the world can kill people with any age. The armies have psychology problems dealing in the horror war.

I would rather to let criminals to do their drugs, and let them die so that we have a less population. For cigarettes, the sellers at the shops should be automatically shut down permanently because we all know that the cigarettes cause lung cancers for years. You should quit smoking today, not tomorrow!

Churches want more babies - Didn't you know that? The pope has no business to interfere our people.

It would be a good idea to control them by giving a special non-toxic chemical instead of an operation. Who is going to do it for us? Does a law allowing doctors or professional to give them the treatment? Do they have the rights? (i.e. The Bill of Rights.) .....sure, they are afraid to break the law.
 
If people think the war is the control of population, then I want to ask.

China, the present first world populated country in the world, have been working so hard to keep its overpopulation in control without the war, and some science already preview that China's population won't be much of different than present to 2050 while India's population are out of control dramatically goes to the first world populated country in 2050 surpassing China. How did China do that?

This is not true. China does not allow the media (news) to be announced because it is a Communism country. India has the highest poor population because they have a lousy program that offers them to take a class about pills and condoms. It is not successful because they are so incredibly stupid. Poor people offspring poor babies, and they grow and still poorer. Rich people offspring rich babies, and they grow and still richer. That's the reality. That's simple. If you said that it is impossible, here is:

Whoopi Goldberg was a homeless, and she was on a welfare for a very long time. A rich man happened saw her on the street, and he offered her a job to be in a movie. That's how she is so successful. She changed it from being poor to being rich so she continues to be rich. Her babies become rich because of their mother. That is simple. You cannot change it unless you have plenty of money. If you are in the middle-class, then you are still the same that cannot be rich unless a person offers you for more money.

For wars, money issue is all about. Rich people are not really go in the war. It is almost fact.

How did you know about the Russia situation? Do you ever contact other people that you know from another country like Germany to get the proof or evidence if the story is true. Our media always twist the truth. The media always says bad things. It is not about Freedom of speech. You will get the idea what is going on from the news.
 
With you all the way!

There is MANY different ways to control the population, like reduce the criminals of drugs, reduce prices and legal age for cigarettes, limiting the numbers of children in the families, etc... War only kill the armies, not the civilians.

Btw, your post seems are not offensive to me ;) Your post is very great.

Awesome :h5:
 
Well, any army in the world can kill people with any age. The armies have psychology problems dealing in the horror war.

Think about this. Government FORCE men go to war, I call this murder. I don't call the cigarettes, drugs, limiting babies, etc as murder.

I would rather to let criminals to do their drugs, and let them die so that we have a less population. For cigarettes, the sellers at the shops should be automatically shut down permanently because we all know that the cigarettes cause lung cancers for years. You should quit smoking today, not tomorrow!

First of all, I am very happy smoker and I don't need to quit right now. I want to smoke as my experience part of my life and I am not ready to quit yet, I want the FUN, not fearing of reality. I only live once and I want to pick up many varies of experiences as much as I can, that's why I travel too much, spending many money, etc. I believe that people who never try smoke, never try drink, never go different countries, never go on airplanes, never try many things are EXTREMELY boring. So let me having fun time which God gave me, the life. :roll:

And about the drugs, how about legal them? It would be crazy haha!


Churches want more babies - Didn't you know that? The pope has no business to interfere our people.

It's up to them, I don't care if they want babies or not.

It would be a good idea to control them by giving a special non-toxic chemical instead of an operation. Who is going to do it for us? Does a law allowing doctors or professional to give them the treatment? Do they have the rights? (i.e. The Bill of Rights.) .....sure, they are afraid to break the law.

I have no idea what to say about this one.. The doctor treatments like surgery, medical, etc. are people's decision, and it's their own business, not governments.

This is not true. China does not allow the media (news) to be announced because it is a Communism country. India has the highest poor population because they have a lousy program that offers them to take a class about pills and condoms. It is not successful because they are so incredibly stupid. Poor people offspring poor babies, and they grow and still poorer. Rich people offspring rich babies, and they grow and still richer. That's the reality. That's simple. If you said that it is impossible, here is:

As for China, what will you tell me about why they limited people to have only one baby per person?

And as for India, it does not matter how they take care of the people or people take care of their babies, what REALLY matter is the population. India will have very seriously overpopulation problem compare to China in the future. China is improving its own, that is why China became a communist because they have to, period. If they don't, then the people will go out of control. Also China have very highest possible to be the first world ecomonic surpassing USA and Japan. China did alot of works to make its better country. India don't do much good works for its own country, that's why it have overpopulation, sickness people, poor people, etc.


Whoopi Goldberg was a homeless, and she was on a welfare for a very long time. A rich man happened saw her on the street, and he offered her a job to be in a movie. That's how she is so successful. She changed it from being poor to being rich so she continues to be rich. Her babies become rich because of their mother. That is simple. You cannot change it unless you have plenty of money. If you are in the middle-class, then you are still the same that cannot be rich unless a person offers you for more money.

What if 100 people go for a rich man's help? Can he handle it? No. That is called overpopulation problem.

For wars, money issue is all about. Rich people are not really go in the war. It is almost fact.

Give me source please. My uncle is a rich man and he was drafted to the war in Afghanstan.

How did you know about the Russia situation? Do you ever contact other people that you know from another country like Germany to get the proof or evidence if the story is true. Our media always twist the truth. The media always says bad things. It is not about Freedom of speech. You will get the idea what is going on from the news.

About the Russia, fine. Here's the source.

Demography of Russia - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Russia have the decline problem because of drugs. Now you see my point about legalized drugs, including cigarettes and alcohol, that would be one of the "in case" if having the overpopulation problem. Drugs DO help the overpopulation problem.
 
Seems like no one are going to answer my questions so I am going to answer the question myself.

China, the present first world populated country in the world, have been working so hard to keep its overpopulation in control without the war, and some science already preview that China's population won't be much of different than present to 2050 while India's population are out of control dramatically goes to the first world populated country in 2050 surpassing China. How did China do that?

Because China are under the communist system and limited people to have one baby per person.

Russia are having the population decline problem today, they already lost 2 millions of people just in past 4 years, and the science already preview that Russia's population will go down from 140 million to 100 million in 2050. Why did Russia have so much of population decline problem?

This is the source.

Demography of Russia - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Yupp it's because of the drugs.


Japan, the today 9th world populated country, has 127 million of people living there right now, and their population growth rate are at 0.00 and won't be any different at 2050. How did Japan's population stay the same from present to 2050?

It's because Japan's job system kept women busy from having the children or get in relationship with other men, and kept men busy from get in relationship with women. Japan also have too many single adults and are one of the highest elders percentage, that applies to Italy too.

ejcjs - The Dilemma Posed by Japan's Population Decline
 
What's your thought that NO WAR will lead?

To me, I could think this issues would cause:

- Great overcrowd population
- more pollution
- too much mate to choice, haha.

That's why there is war that necessary to be part of social to make more balance on life and everything else.

War has no benefit that could not be accomplished in some other way. Carl Von Clausewitz' famous quote: "War is merely the continuation of politics" is absolutely right. That's why political institutions like the United Nations, as flawed as they may be, are very important. When they work properly, they give the countries of the world a place to continue a political struggle without resorting immediately to war. Sometimes this prevents war, sometimes it doesn't.

What's really sad about war is how wasteful it is in so many ways. Let's just talk about one of those ways, maybe the least important one -- money. If you live in the United States, over 50% of your income tax dollars are being spent right now to pay for military spending (either paying debt on past military spending, or paying for current expenses in Afghanastan, Iraq, and elsewhere). That means that collectively we're spending roughly 1.2 TRILLION dollars per year on all military spending (Federal outlays are at roughly 2.5 trillion per year). Since the government's annual income tax revenue actually only equals about 1.2 trillion in the first place, and everything else is deficit spending, we're effectively spending our ENTIRE annual tax revenue on military spending right now, and paying for everything else on credit. Friends, our priorities are goofed up.

For some reason, we can always find enough money to kill people, but we struggle to find enough money to help people. There's a great movie that pretty much lays all this stuff out:

Why We Fight (2005)
 
Good post, Calphool! Very true... That's why we have lousy ecomonic right now... Bush's fault...
 
...My uncle is a rich man and he was drafted to the war in Afghanstan...
The USA doesn't draft anyone into the military for the war in Afghanistan. The draft ended in 1973.
 
The USA doesn't draft anyone into the military for the war in Afghanistan. The draft ended in 1973.

Really? That's what my uncle told me.. Maybe he doesn't want the family to know that he actually want to be army...:dunno: And I forgot to tell, he do not fight in the war, he is a supplier army and help Afghanstan people to have the buildings for their schools and hostipals, but still, the Afghanstan armies was trying to shoot his teams and camps..
 
Think about this. Government FORCE men go to war, I call this murder. I don't call the cigarettes, drugs, limiting babies, etc as murder.

Yes, it is a "mass" murder... I agreed with you.

First of all, I am very happy smoker and I don't need to quit right now.

Gee. I wish that you quit smoking. My young grandmother died from throat cancer. My friend also died from lung cancer when he was about 24 years old. They had a good health and all of suddenly they became ill very fast. I am still mad at the doctors for not trying enough to rid of the cancer. The doctor was too busy himself in the hospital. I was there. He is full of...

I have no idea what to say about this one.. The doctor treatments like surgery, medical, etc. are people's decision, and it's their own business, not governments.

Oops. It was from Mann_K05's example on his comment.

I already know about the China's overpopulation. One child per family... You were referring the compare the date from now to 2050. I was confused what you wrote about the weight between China and India. I was thinking of a Media that won't reveal the new info outside the country. I feel that we are producing numbers of babies like fleas multiply the babies in a few days.

Give me source please. My uncle is a rich man and he was drafted to the war in Afghanstan.

I said almost fact but not enough evidence. Michael Moore told many people that the Congress people won't let their adult-children to go to the war. I am surprised that he is right. A Senator's son made his choice to go to the war as a volunteer, and sadly he was killed. I didn't mention multimillionaires on my post. Your uncle was drafted to go to the war because he was forced to obey the law. I am sorry that he saw many horrible things out there that we don't see in the news.

The source that you gave me the Wikipedia's link. I believe it because this information is probably from a college teacher that visited in Russia - I don't know, but it seems that way. My mother's friend was a teacher. He travelled and studied in foreign cultures. I don't remember if he wrote his doctoral books for his college students. (He joined with my mother to pick me up and my boxes in her truck when I was a freshman (college). I did not expect to have a company in the truck with full of my stuff. I was caved in the back seat for six hours on our way home. It was bad, and I never forgot that man in the truck. I hope that you don't mind that I wrote this.)

I respect you even I disagree with you. I could learn something that I may not be aware of something. I am not competing you to find out who is right or wrong. We all make some mistakes - I don't care. No hard feeling.
 
Oops. It was from Mann_K05's example on his comment.
.

It would be a good idea to control them by giving a special non-toxic chemical instead of an operation. Who is going to do it for us? Does a law allowing doctors or professional to give them the treatment? Do they have the rights? (i.e. The Bill of Rights.) .....sure, they are afraid to break the law.

Heh. I'm surprise that you like my idea lol

I believe in a person should do it if he or she want to try. I meant, for his/her extremely talent can make it happen so amaze. I just wish the laws are so fexieble (sp). mmhmm...
 
Oops. It was from Mann_K05's example on his comment.

Ohh it's she, actually ;)

I already know about the China's overpopulation. One child per family... You were referring the compare the date from now to 2050. I was confused what you wrote about the weight between China and India. I was thinking of a Media that won't reveal the new info outside the country. I feel that we are producing numbers of babies like fleas multiply the babies in a few days.

Now you mentioned to the 2050 that I just talked about, here's interesting source. It's from the US Buearu Government.

IDB -- Rank Countries by Population

So you will see China has 1,321,851,888 people present compare to India at 1,129,866,154, and in 2025, India goes crazy nearly tied with China added another about 300,000,000 so India will have 1,448,821,234 while China only increased about 100,000,000 so China will have 1,453,123,817. Thus at 2050, India will finally surpassed China by adding another about 300,000,000 so India would have 1,807,878,574 while China decreased its population about 30,000,000 so China will have 1,424,161,948. That's why I said that China's population wouldn't be much of different than present and future.


I said almost fact but not enough evidence. Michael Moore told many people that the Congress people won't let their adult-children to go to the war. I am surprised that he is right. A Senator's son made his choice to go to the war as a volunteer, and sadly he was killed. I didn't mention multimillionaires on my post. Your uncle was drafted to go to the war because he was forced to obey the law. I am sorry that he saw many horrible things out there that we don't see in the news.

The source that you gave me the Wikipedia's link. I believe it because this information is probably from a college teacher that visited in Russia - I don't know, but it seems that way. My mother's friend was a teacher. He travelled and studied in foreign cultures. I don't remember if he wrote his doctoral books for his college students. (He joined with my mother to pick me up and my boxes in her truck when I was a freshman (college). I did not expect to have a company in the truck with full of my stuff. I was caved in the back seat for six hours on our way home. It was bad, and I never forgot that man in the truck. I hope that you don't mind that I wrote this.)

I respect you even I disagree with you. I could learn something that I may not be aware of something. I am not competing you to find out who is right or wrong. We all make some mistakes - I don't care. No hard feeling.

Wow, interesting about your experience... I am very sorry about you have to get through this on the truck.. Of course I would always respect you even though you disagree with me :) We are the people, we debate.
 
Come on, warriors and politicans are suppose to be separate. Many politicans, but the combat veterans like McCain or Kerry, doesn't know how to control the war.
 
I can not image this world be without war. It is man's world. Boys will be boys. Always fight over stupid things.
 
Come on, warriors and politicans are suppose to be separate. Many politicans, but the combat veterans like McCain or Kerry, doesn't know how to control the war.
Prez Bush is commander chief and he does not know how to run the war either.
 
If people think the war is the control of population, then I want to ask.

China, the present first world populated country in the world, have been working so hard to keep its overpopulation in control without the war, and some science already preview that China's population won't be much of different than present to 2050 while India's population are out of control dramatically goes to the first world populated country in 2050 surpassing China. How did China do that?

Russia are having the population decline problem today, they already lost 2 millions of people just in past 4 years, and the science already preview that Russia's population will go down from 140 million to 100 million in 2050. Why did Russia have so much of population decline problem?

Japan, the today 9th world populated country, has 127 million of people living there right now, and their population growth rate are at 0.00 and won't be any different at 2050. How did Japan's population stay the same from present to 2050?

If you answer those, you will find alot of ways to control the population more than just the war.

When immigrants from Latin America, such as Mexico, any countries from Central and South America are still growing with increase of growth rate then USA would hit roughly 400-500 million by 2050 since white (non-hispanic) population is dropping to under 50%, from roughly 70% in 2000 due massive growth of immigrant from Latin America.

It's projection but Texas, California, New Mexico, Florida and even Arizona would be more latino population than white population, also not know about other states.
 
Back
Top