BecLak
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jun 19, 2009
- Messages
- 2,372
- Reaction score
- 60
That is not true. That is the reason so many more people with severe loss than profound are able to attain speech. They have far more access to sound.
And it really insulting to anyone profoundly deaf who did not manage to attain speech.
(Bott, I am sorry if what I wrote offended you. It was definitely not intentional and I will do my best to correct that. Please accept my apologies)
Please let me clarify my post: Yes, I may have some access to loud sounds, what I do hear is more of an incumbermant to me than a 'help', but I was referring primarily to speech,when it comes to speech, in the wrong conditions where I cannot rely on visual imput, I am deaf as it comes.
I also want to state clearly - I am anti-audism. I may have been raised (and for the most part still am) in a totally oral environment, and it may appear that I became one of the 'success stories' that oralists and audists brag about, however, paradoxically I only share my experience because I want to prove them wrong. I am not a 'success story' of the oral programs or the technological devices they push for a 'solution to the problem of deafness'. I have shared my 'achievements' to show the exact opposite. I am my own 'success story' I have achieved everything in my life by my own efforts (together with the help of my loving family and my faith in my Creator) not with any assistive devices. With determination, we can do anything we put our minds to do except hear.
I am not advocating for oral only, quite the contrary, I was never given the choice growing up - oral only was the only thing I was handed, and now I am required to remain oral for the work I am involved in together with my husband. If I were given the choice, I would not speak (it takes too much effort). Having the ability to speak does not give me QOL. It is an immense source of frustration, exhaustion, and cause of misconceptions and mis-understandings. Better life without it. Visual language and visual expression crosses over all communication barriers if we allow it to. I strongly detest that people judge others by the way they speak or not speak and say they are less intelligent because they do not have 'perfect speech'.
(Bott, you are a perfect example of one who does not use speech and you don't need to. You are intelligent (it is evident in your posts) and you show understanding and diplomacy to many if not all on the forum here. I appreciate you. I have learned much from you and I know there are many who can say the same).
Last edited: