Trayvon Case Investigation

Status
Not open for further replies.
Waterboy said:
What about Zimmerman? Why can't you people stick to the topic?
Click to expand...
"You people?"

It would be easier to stick to the topic if there wasn't an elephant in the room (thread).
 
Reba said:
See? O'Mara never said that Zimmerman lied or misled.
Click to expand...

Are you blind? Just curious since you seem not to be able to read what he said in the news accounts. When is hiding the fact that you have 204,000 thousand dollars and telling the court and your lawyer you don't have any money not lying?
 
Reba said:
Jillio, you could clear this all up with coming clean. Then, we can all go back to focusing on the topics.

The false identity of Waterboy is the elephant in the room that everyone is afraid to confront. Therefor, it's a distraction to every thread that you visit.

If Alex has forgiven you and removed your ban, that's fine with me. The more the merrier. It's the deceit that's disturbing.
Click to expand...

:cool2:

I've always wondered how many banned members are currently participating here under "sock puppet" names...
 
VacationGuy234 said:
His lawyer was brought into the case late. Did his previous lawyers know about the site? I'm quite sure the justice department knew.
Click to expand...

Knowing about the site isn't what it is about. Being deceptive about the money is what the point is.

The DOJ is only looking at whether this is a hate crime. They aren't involved in the 2nd degree murder charge. That is a state charge.
 
LoveBlue said:
Hey, now. Don't be insulting our friend Botts. :)
Click to expand...

LOL....it is the common term given to people that are posting under false pretenses...not sure who coined that phrase. Notice no one is replying to Reba's post? :hmm:
 
From post #1:

this thread is purely about discovery of new facts and nothing else because it seems that you do not know how to handle it with civility and honesty.

so it's best if we post only new findings. anything else will be reported and dealt with.

:ty: and this simple rule should be quite simple to follow. if you cannot follow this, then I feel sorry for you.
 
Waterboy said:
Knowing about the site isn't what it is about. Being deceptive about the money is what the point is.

The DOJ is only looking at whether this is a hate crime. They aren't involved in the 2nd degree murder charge. That is a state charge.
Click to expand...

DOJ is certainly not looking into the NBPP and Mikhail Muhammad as a hate crime from a terrorist organization. And this IS ON TOPIC about the Zimmerman case!
 
Waterboy said:
Knowing about the site isn't what it is about. Being deceptive about the money is what the point is.

The DOJ is only looking at whether this is a hate crime. They aren't involved in the 2nd degree murder charge. That is a state charge.
Click to expand...

And, you don't believe the Martin camp will be deceptive about money when it comes time to decide how much they should be awarded? In case you didn't know, there are sites setup for that camp as well.

In the end, the lion's share is going to the lawyers, of course.
 
rolling7 said:
DOJ is certainly not looking into the NBPP and Mikhail Muhammad as a hate crime from a terrorist organization. And this IS ON TOPIC about the Zimmerman case!
Click to expand...

Freedom of speech. Same as with the KKK. Nothing to look into until they do something. They can say anything they want.
 
VacationGuy234 said:
And, you don't believe the Martin camp will be deceptive about money when it comes time to decide how much they should be awarded? In case you didn't know, there are sites setup for that camp as well.

In the end, the lion's share is going to the lawyers, of course.
Click to expand...

How can you be deceptive about how much to be awarded? You ask for an amount, the court either denies it or gives it to you. But since a civil case hasn't been filed, they haven't asked for any money. Don't even know if they will file a civil case. This is about a criminal case.

This isn't about websites. It is about lying to the court about indigent status when he had 204,000 in an account.
 
Waterboy said:
Are you blind? Just curious since you seem not to be able to read what he said in the news accounts. When is hiding the fact that you have 204,000 thousand dollars and telling the court and your lawyer you don't have any money not lying?
Click to expand...
Are you dreaming?

Zimmerman did not state anything about the money before Wednesday. The court didn't ask him, and his lawyer didn't ask him. He volunteered the information himself. Check what his lawyer said.
 
It appears extremely hypocritical to me that someone could post about another person's lies when the poster can't even tell the truth.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top