Trayvon Case Investigation

Status
Not open for further replies.
That's quite a bit of speculation. Interesting.

I say same for yours since you believe you and/or others see no wrongdoing in Zimmerman's case and that no question should be asked and he should just go on about his life.

I'm glad that special prosecutor's casting a doubt on Zimmerman's defense and has decided to bring it to trial to question the validity of his truth.
 
Wha What? She represents the court? What a terrible conflict of interest. She is supposed to represent "the people" or "the county" or "the state" We better alert the media right away.

Maybe you meant an "officer of the court". That would apply to the attorneys on both sides.

:lol: more quibbling?

I can't believe this farce is still going on. It should have ended at Post #185 and that's that so I'm going to have to ask you kindly to cease this farce and move on. I don't want to have to get the mods involved.
 
Reread Post #185 slowly if you still don't understand.


you disgust me. I don't wager on death or man's life :ugh:

I read it.... It in no way answers my question.

I see. Guess you are not too sure about the verdict.
 
:lol: more quibbling?

I can't believe this farce is still going on. It should have ended at Post #185 and that's that so I'm going to have to ask you kindly to cease this farce and move on. I don't want to have to get the mods involved.

What farce? You claimed Corey represented the court. I rebutted that claim.
 
I say same for yours since you believe you and/or others see no wrongdoing in Zimmerman's case and that no question should be asked and he should just go on about his life.

I haven't seen anyone say this. I for one am glad there was an investigation. Murder 2 seems to be an overcharge to me based on the evidence that we are aware of. It will be interesting to see what new evidence comes out in the trial.
 
sigh.... the "alibi is affirmative defense" farce.

Ah, then why do you keep continuing that? I was happy to move on after showing you where the court said alibi is not an affirmative defense. So yes let's discontinue the farce.
 
I haven't seen anyone say this. I for one am glad there was an investigation. Murder 2 seems to be an overcharge to me based on the evidence that we are aware of. It will be interesting to see what new evidence comes out in the trial.

I thought we agreed to let the professionals handle their jobs? You should not be concerned with what you think based on evidence you're aware of. If Zimmerman is being charged with Murder 2, then apparently the prosecutor must have evidence beyond reasonable doubt that the shooting wasn't justified so I'll leave it at that.
 
I thought we agreed to let the professionals handle their jobs? You should not be concerned with what you think based on evidence you're aware of. If Zimmerman is being charged with Murder 2, then apparently the prosecutor must have evidence beyond reasonable doubt that the shooting wasn't justified so I'll leave it at that.

Yup, that's correct and wait until new evidences to be revealed in the court.
 
Ah, then why do you keep continuing that? I was happy to move on after showing you where the court said alibi is not an affirmative defense. So yes let's discontinue the farce.

no.......... you said Corey misspoke it and that she missed a day or two at law school. Don't even try to weasel your way out of this. You misunderstood her comment and that is a fact.

I read it.... It in no way answers my question.
that's fine and I'm not interested anymore because Post #185 ends it all. I remind you - this thread is about Zimmerman. What prosecutor said wasn't referring to Zimmerman's case so feel free to create a new thread about it if you're still confused.

I see. Guess you are not too sure about the verdict.
oh I'm quite sure of it. If I'm wrong, well that's too bad. I can accept it and move on :lol:

At least I have a backbone to make a strong statement and stand by it until I'm wrong. I'm not gonna cover up my ass with a lame "perhaps" disclaimer notice. :lol:
 
I thought we agreed to let the professionals handle their jobs? You should not be concerned with what you think based on evidence you're aware of. If Zimmerman is being charged with Murder 2, then apparently the prosecutor must have evidence beyond reasonable doubt that the shooting wasn't justified so I'll leave it at that.

:lol: Exactly what I am doing. :) I haven't drawn any conclusions.
 
:lol: Exactly what I am doing. :) I haven't drawn any conclusions.

You believe Zimmerman was within his self-defense rights and Murder 2 was an overkill.

now let's get back to posting facts and news. This quibbling has gone too far. My mouse click is just one hairline away away from contacting a mod.
 
no.......... you said Corey misspoke it and that she missed a day or two at law school. Don't even try to weasel your way out of this. You misunderstood her comment and that is a fact.


that's fine and I'm not interested anymore because Post #185 ends it all. I remind you - this thread is about Zimmerman. What prosecutor said wasn't referring to Zimmerman's case so feel free to create a new thread about it if you're still confused.


oh I'm quite sure of it. If I'm wrong, well that's too bad. I can accept it and move on :lol:

At least I have a backbone to make a strong statement and stand by it until I'm wrong. I'm not gonna cover up my ass with a lame "perhaps" disclaimer notice. :lol:

1) I stand by that statement 100%. What she said was incorrect

2) Making a strong statement without all of the facts is usually seen as the act of a fool, not having a backbone. I'm not saying you are fool of course. I am comfortable discussing the evidence without drawing conclusions but if you want to guess then that is cool by me. We are all friends here, :)
 
You believe Zimmerman was within his self-defense rights and Murder 2 was an overkill.

now let's get back to posting facts and news. This quibbling has gone too far. My mouse click is just one hairline away away from contacting a mod. .

Be sure to tell the mod you are attempting to assign opinions to other posters.

I believe BASED ON EVIDENCE we currently have Murder is overCHARGE. I look forward to seeing what else the prosecution might have.

I believe Zimmerman is entitled to PLEA self defense (different than stand your ground) Whether or not it WAS self defense. :dunno:

Perhaps it would be a good idea for you to stop telling people what they think. You have done that to several in this thread alone. That is what is causing problems.
 
1) I stand by that statement 100%. What she's aid was incorrect
We'll just agree to disagree.

2) Making a strong statement without all of the facts is usually seen as the act of a fool, not having a backbone. I'm not saying you are fool of course. I am comfortable discussing the evidence without drawing conclusions but if you want to guess then that is cool by me. We are all friends here, :)
I stand by my statement 200% because no armed law-abiding citizen should EVER EVER pursue or take matters into their own hands. To do so.... you (general you) must be either incredibly stupid or morbidly depraved. As I said before - my statement is based on series of event that has taken place which led to shooting, not whether or not if shooting was justified because we don't know and it's highly circumstantial so we'll just leave that to jury to decide on it.

Once again - my statement is specifically based on Zimmerman foolishly choosing to leave his vehicle to pursue him especially when he was packing a heat. and he should never left his car and he should have let the cops handle it.
 
Be sure to tell the mod you are attempting to assign opinions to other posters.

I believe BASED ON EVIDENCE we currently have is overkill. I look forward to seeing what else the prosecution might have.

I believe Zimmerman is entitled to PLEA self defense (different than stand your ground) Whether or not it WAS self defense. :dunno:

Perhaps it would be a good idea for you to stop telling people what they think. You have done that to several in this thread alone. That is what is causing problems.

last and final warning.
 
Judge may have conflict in Zimmerman case - OrlandoSentinel.com
The judge hearing the George Zimmerman case today announced that her husband works for the law firm of Mark NeJame, who's been hired to act as a CNN analyst for this case.

Trayvon Martin George Zimmerman charged. Hearing in case against George Zimmerman set for 1:15 p.m. today - Orlando Sentinel
SANFORD – The judge hearing the George Zimmerman case today announced that her husband works for the law firm of Mark NeJame, who's been hired as a CNN analyst for this case.

Circuit Judge Jessica Recksiedler said she had an ethical obligation to disclose that and allow Zimmerman's attorney or the special prosecutor to ask her to step down.

No one's made that request yet, but Zimmerman's attorney, Mark O'Mara, said he may next week.

If he does, she's almost certain to grant his motion.

All that O'Mara must show is that his client has a reasonable belief that the judge might not be fair, said Altamonte Springs attorney Steve Laurence.

The judge scheduled the 10-minute hearing on her own, specifically to tell attorneys about the issue.

Zimmerman did not appear. Neither did the attorneys, who were tied into the courtroom by phone.

Zimmerman called NeJame's law firm March 15 and talked to lawyer Eric Barker, saying he wanted the firm to represent him, NeJame said Friday. NeJame decided no, he said, largely because he has daughters ages 2 and 6, and several other businesses.

Two weeks ago, NeJame signed on with CNN, he said. Earlier this week, a friend who was in daily contact with Zimmerman called NeJame's firm again and asked that NeJame take the case.

That time, NeJame said, he again said no and recommended several attorneys, including O'Mara.

The judge's husband, Jason Recksiedler, is a partner at NeJame's firm, heading the personal injury section, Nejame said.

Bernie de la Rionda, the lead prosecutor in the case, said he had no intention of asking the judge to disqualify herself.

In an unrelated side note, the judge also announced that Zimmerman will have a bond hearing April 20.

Zimmerman is charged with second-degree murder in the Feb. 26 shooting of Trayvon Martin, a black, unarmed 17-year-old.

In a probable cause affidavit filed Thursday, prosecutors alleged that Zimmerman, a Neighborhood Watch volunteer, pursued Trayvon, frightened him, confronted him then shot him during a struggle.

The account is strikingly similar to the story that Trayvon's parents, the family's attorneys and civil-rights leaders have told for weeks — that Trayvon was an innocent victim hunted down and killed because he was black.

Notably absent is Zimmerman's account. In that version, Zimmerman is the victim. He told police and his family that he had stopped following Trayvon, from Miami Gardens, and was returning to his SUV when the teenager approached him. He said the two exchanged words, Trayvon knocked him to the ground and then began hammering his head against a sidewalk.

During his first court appearance Thursday, Zimmerman said just two words, "Yes, sir," when asked by Seminole County Judge Mark Herr if he understood that he was charged with second-degree murder.

Herr found the affidavit legally sufficient to establish probable cause and ordered Zimmerman to appear for arraignment — when defendants formally enter a plea — on May 29.

For now, Zimmerman is being held in the Seminole County jail without bond in "administrative confinement," away from other inmates.
 
We'll just agree to disagree.


I stand by my statement 200% because no armed law-abiding citizen should EVER EVER pursue or take matters into their own hands. To do so.... you (general you) must be either incredibly stupid or morbidly depraved. As I said before - my statement is based on series of event that has taken place which led to shooting, not whether or not if shooting was justified because we don't know and it's highly circumstantial so we'll just leave that to jury to decide on it.

Once again - my statement is specifically based on Zimmerman foolishly choosing to leave his vehicle to pursue him especially when he was packing a heat. and he should never left his car and he should have let the cops handle it.

Wonderful! :thumb:
 
last and final warning.

That's cool. And same for you. Please kindly stop telling me and other members what we think. Most of us are more than willing to say what we think already. So let's get back to the case. :cool2:
 
That's cool. And same for you. Please kindly stop telling me and other members what we think. Most of us are more than willing to say what we think already. So let's get back to the case. :cool2:

Let's not try to put in last words because that's just immature. With that, your post has been reported.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top