- Joined
- Jul 26, 2009
- Messages
- 19,035
- Reaction score
- 8
Call the hounds.
We got a fox to catch.
What you mean? j/k
Call the hounds.
We got a fox to catch.
What you mean? j/k
They just get their info. from other people, especially on politics. You'll be surprised how many people never went to a public library. So, I don't see how computers made it worst.
Your wife wants a new scarf and boots.
Increased access. More unreliable sources.
But that person got Usher's syndrome.... meaning they will lose vision and or hearing. Some lose complete sight and complete hearing with it, depending on what kind of Usher's syndrome it is.
Another variable that was accounted for in that debate.
Well, I don't know about the people you associate with, but I know plenty of people that utilize the library resources....both before and after the computer revolution.
You are correct. Many people don't even own a computer, and many that do use it only for entertainment purposes, not educational purposes.
They just get their info. from other people, especially on politics. You'll be surprised how many people never went to a public library. So, I don't see how computers made it worst.
I can.
And coming from a house that was pretty strict in what we were allowed to have... (like I never got a cellphone until I was 19 or 20) and so on....
Computers can make it worse because it adds more distractions ontop of the already existing distractions.
well, it is not going away Unless you want the gov't take control of free speech. Also, I read SO many books that is outdated and false, so books are no better. Read what people use to read to get their educated opinion from: Main Page - Gutenberg <--- so many unreliable sources.
that person can still use braille-computer... like Hear Again. She was about to peruse thru massive amount of knowledge in short time because of computer. a significant advantage over a blind person without a computer because one has to go to library, retrieve it or place a request on book that is in other town or wherever - sometimes not.
computer is a tool. one can utilize a tool effectively. one can't. for those who can utilize it effectively and smartly, one gets ahead of his equal self with no computer.
Wouldn't that "speed" (all things considered equal) allow that person to reach their goal more quickly. Isn't that the same argument that was used for an able-bodied person using SSI for attending school rather than working their way through school?
No, not necessarily. And quickness has virtually nothing to do with the quality of an education.
No, that isn't the argument used for SSI to attend school. SSDI is permantly total disability. It's purpose is not to provide for vocational or educational rehab.
Ahead how? We are right back to the statement that the only advantage is speed.
Jiro, you young whippersnapper! Us old folks got our education before computers and we are very educated. There's this place called a LIBRARY and you research with DEWEY DECIMAL FILES. We typed our papers on TYPEWRITERS. I know that's hard to believe! lol
oh? so why did military and universities create ARPANET (now called as Internet)? it's obviously because this allow people of great minds to reach the goal more quickly.
Why does Jiro seems to have the concept of "one fits all" methodology in his head right now?
Why does Jiro seems to have the concept of "one fits all" methodology in his head right now?
You are attributing motive where there is nothing to support it.