- Joined
- Oct 20, 2006
- Messages
- 7,618
- Reaction score
- 27
I don't understand what you're talking about.
You mean, you did not watch countless hours of sitcoms?
I don't understand what you're talking about.
Well, that would not have been helpful for Obama. If 10% of each race was racist enough to vote that way, the numbers would be pretty strongly in favor of McCain/Palin.
I know who Urkel is and The Simpsons is the greatest show in all of space and time (including the future). I just have no idea what he meant.You mean, you did not watch countless hours of sitcoms?
I know who Urkel is and The Simpsons is the greatest show in all of space and time (including the future). I just have no idea what he meant.
I remember Howard Cosell lost his job as football announcer for making a comment about "Look at the little monkey run" when describing a black athlete. He was a strong advocate for racial equality, but it did not matter. Many cries went out for his head.
Nobody can determine the intent of the sender of this email. We can only speculate. I do know that there is nothing racist if a white person is depicted as a monkey/watermelon eater. If someone made a comment about "Obama loves his watermelon" the racist overtones would be there. That is just the way it is. Rice eater = Asian. Bean eater = Mexican. Those are not my depictions, but they are phrases commonly used in a racist manner.
He was pressured to apologize, but he refused. He left the program after that season, using the "I am bored with this" speech. It could very well be that he was asked to leave.Actually he didn't lose his job....but yes I remember the event well. He had to explain the next week
Jimmy "the Greek" lost his job on NFL Today for saying blacks were better athletes because they were bred to play the game.
That would be naive of you. It would mean that more blacks (by percentage) voted racially. I cannot fathom that whites would vote for a candidate of another party as the main decision-maker being that he was black. Same with blacks voting for a white candidate because he is white. I think the percent is more likely pretty close to the same. That would tell me that more whites in total numbers voted for McCain strictly because he is white than blacks voted for Obama because he is black. If 100,000 voters of each race voted for "one of their own" then that would paint the blacks are more racist by percentage.I didn't say by %.....I said number of people
He was pressured to apologize, but he refused. He left the program after that season, using the "I am bored with this" speech. It could very well be that he was asked to leave.
.
True....that is why I used the word explained. The next week He explained the he was referring to the player's (Ricky Sanders I think it was) small size and elusiveness....but he wouldn't apologize. In that was.....given his record....I don't blame him
Oops....I was wrong it was Alvin Garrett....I knew it was a Redskin
Totally unfounded and ridiculous..... "majority"
The country is split. Many hated Bush for his policies and many feel the same about obama's...... Then some of us dislike both.
Actually, no one ever answered it. There was a lot of ducking and weaving. But no one answered. No one said they also deplored the images of Bush (possibly excepting Reba, who said she was against denigrating cartoons and e-mails). No one seemed to have any problem with that huge billboard of Bush made up of monkey images.
Maybe if we all treated Obama with the respect shown to Bush, maybe we'd all be ok?
Oh...wait....
That would be naive of you. It would mean that more blacks (by percentage) voted racially. I cannot fathom that whites would vote for a candidate of another party as the main decision-maker being that he was black. Same with blacks voting for a white candidate because he is white. I think the percent is more likely pretty close to the same. That would tell me that more whites in total numbers voted for McCain strictly because he is white than blacks voted for Obama because he is black. If 100,000 voters of each race voted for "one of their own" then that would paint the blacks are more racist by percentage.
What does TXgolfer have to do with members of the Tea Party?
Actually, no one ever answered it. There was a lot of ducking and weaving. But no one answered. No one said they also deplored the images of Bush (possibly excepting Reba, who said she was against denigrating cartoons and e-mails). No one seemed to have any problem with that huge billboard of Bush made up of monkey images.
Maybe if we all treated Obama with the respect shown to Bush, maybe we'd all be ok?
Oh...wait....
Yep, but if you look at the billboards, you would do a double take at Bush next to the chimps. I mean, the resemblance is SO striking, whoaaa.
The answer to that question is implicit in the posts already made. Ducking and weaving? Um...
Okay, I'll spell it out if that's what you'd like:
No, the comparisons of Bush to a monkey were not racist. How could they be? Bush is a white male. There is no historical context of racial epithets being made towards white people by comparing them to monkeys. There is a historical context of comparing politicians to monkeys, as you pointed out, and it is certainly in bad taste. Those caricatures comparing politicians to monkeys and apes seem to have protection under the guise of "political satire," but in the case of Obama, that protection is superseded by the racial epithet.
Is that more clear? I'm not even sure why you're asking the question. I don't want to sound dogmatic here, but seriously, I don't understand how anybody can question whether or not this is racist.
Well, that would not have been helpful for Obama. If 10% of each race was racist enough to vote that way, the numbers would be pretty strongly in favor of McCain/Palin.
I didn't say by %.....I said number of people
That's fine..you can hate Obama's policy but keep his race out of it. When I mean "you" I am speaking generally.