- Joined
- Jan 2, 2008
- Messages
- 3,418
- Reaction score
- 8
"acquire language and music naturally" - so she is naturally learning language on her own, no therapy of any kind?
Yes.
"acquire language and music naturally" - so she is naturally learning language on her own, no therapy of any kind?
Caroline...brace yourself for what I am about to share...
AVT is an approach to teach deaf and hard of hearing individuals to "maximize the use of their hearing abilities." They cover their mouths while they teach them listening skills. They are against using visual cues or communication.
Professionals that use AVT believe that children who do not use sign language develop a more sophisticated use of their hearing and speaking skills.
WHAT?! My stomach just twisted right now. I can't believe this method exists. That sounds so...corporal and 19th century. Do they still use this method nowadays?
very much so
those videos thanks to kokonut were AVT ads
My god.
No, not against visual cues. This is about training the ear in the effort to help improve listening skill. That's the whole idea of AVT. You don't get your visual cues talking on a phone do you? Or when someone is talking to you without looking? AVT is done with hearing aids and CI.
AVT definitely does not help you hear better. That's such an archaic belief. you learn to hear by being taught to associate the sound with an object. Like associating the baa-ing sound with sheep, etc. But covering your mouth to make deaf kids "hear" better? Uhhh....right. If that were true, I should be hearing alot more than I can because my mother covered her mouth for years to get me to try to discern the differences between words like "bee, knee, gee, tree" and even after 10 years, I still could and can only hear "eee".
thats like saying if you plug up the ears of kids who wear glasses, they would see better. I mean....wow.
How can kokonut see what I wrote if he's on my ignore list?? Nobody quoted my last post. that's freaky.
How can kokonut see what I wrote if he's on my ignore list?? Nobody quoted my last post. that's freaky.
How can kokonut see what I wrote if he's on my ignore list?? Nobody quoted my last post. that's freaky.
FYI, they also used that "covering their mouths" method in AVT with adults as well. I've had the therapist try that with me. I don't mind cause I do want to try to improve my listening skills.WHAT?! My stomach just twisted right now. I can't believe this method exists. That sounds so...corporal and 19th century. Do they still use this method nowadays?
FYI, they also used that "covering their mouths" method in AVT with adults as well. I've had the therapist try that with me. I don't mind cause I do want to try to improve my listening skills.
Caroline...brace yourself for what I am about to share...
AVT is an approach to teach deaf and hard of hearing individuals to "maximize the use of their hearing abilities." They cover their mouths while they teach them listening skills. They are against using visual cues or communication.
Professionals that use AVT believe that children who do not use sign language develop a more sophisticated use of their hearing and speaking skills.
AVT definitely does not help you hear better. That's such an archaic belief. you learn to hear by being taught to associate the sound with an object. Like associating the baa-ing sound with sheep, etc. But covering your mouth to make deaf kids "hear" better? Uhhh....right. If that were true, I should be hearing alot more than I can because my mother covered her mouth for years to get me to try to discern the differences between words like "bee, knee, gee, tree" and even after 10 years, I still could and can only hear "eee".
thats like saying if you plug up the ears of kids who wear glasses, they would see better. I mean....wow.
AVT does NOT preclude sign language outside of its practicing sessions.
Oral deaf education does NOT preclude sign language outside of its practicing sessions.
The premise was in order for a deaf child to speak well, they must be kept apart from ASL and the deaf community. Entirely. Or at least that's how it was back in my day.