Texas inmate, 67, set for execution in slayings 31 years ago

rockin'robin

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 22, 2007
Messages
24,431
Reaction score
549
HUNTSVILLE, Texas (AP) — A 67-year-old man who was convicted of killing four men more than three decades ago has asked the U.S. Supreme Court to keep him from becoming the oldest Texas prisoner put to death in an execution scheduled for Wednesday evening.

Lester Bower Jr. faces lethal injection for the October 1983 fatal shootings at an airplane hangar on a ranch near Sherman, about 60 miles north of Dallas. Prosecutors say he killed the four after stealing an airplane that he had been trying to buy from one of his victims.

"I do have remorse," Bower, who has maintained his innocence, told The Associated Press two weeks ago from death row. "I'm remorseful for putting my family and my wife and my friends through this.

"If this is going to bring some closure to them (the victim's family), then good. But if they think by this they're executing the person that killed their loved one, then that's going to come up a little bit short."

If the execution goes ahead, Bower would be the eighth inmate given a lethal dose of pentobarbital this year in Texas, which carries out capital punishment more than any other state.

His attorneys told the high court that jurors didn't have the opportunity in their punishment deliberations to fully consider that Bower had no previous criminal record. Attorneys also contended that the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals used an incorrect legal standard when it denied an appeal for Bower a decade ago.

"This is not a typical death penalty case," his lead lawyer, Peter Buscemi, told the justices, urging a reprieve so the court "has sufficient time" to evaluate the appeal.

Stephen Hoffman, an assistant Texas attorney general, responded that 30 years of litigation was enough and justice already had been delayed "for the four families of the men that Bower slaughtered in cold blood."

The Supreme Court declined in March to review Bower's case — although three justices, Stephen Breyer, Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Sonia Sotomayor, said they would have thrown out his death sentence.

http://news.yahoo.com/texas-inmate-67-set-execution-slayings-31-years-054827888.html#
 
Why wait 31 years? Unbelievable! By looking at the pictures of him, he seemed happy that he stays alive for that long.
 
What *IF* he is truly innocent? He maintain innocent so execution good idea? I don't think so.

Why wait 31 years? Unbelievable! By looking at the pictures of him, he seemed happy that he stays alive for that long.
 
he certainly been punish having all these years on death row and what if he is innocent...Sad for all the families involved never being able move on
 
There is no doubt that I could be wrong.

However I believe it is reasonable, after the thirty (30) years of appeals / litigation and nothing having been discovered to overturn his conviction, justice has been served.
 
Many have proven their innocent after years of serving and got out, some got their name cleared, so the chances exists.
 
If he's truly innocent, how come his lawyer failed to prove it?

He is dead so there nothing more his lawyer can do save his life, they can try to clear his name but not sure what good that would do . That would ne horrible for his family to find out he was innocent .
 
Many have proven their innocent after years of serving and got out, some got their name cleared, so the chances exists.
Well, all I can say is that a defendant lawyer is responsible for proving that his/her client's not guilty.
 
Thats not the point, the point is there is always *WHAT IF*, once executed we can NOT take it back. Thus why I don't think execution is good idea. There is no justice, no closure, no NOTHING if one executed and the guilty one is free on street ready to strike others... Where is justice when this happens?

Well, all I can say is that a defendant lawyer is responsible for proving that his/her client's not guilty.
 
http://murderpedia.org/male.B/b/bower-lester-leroy.htm

http://murderpedia.org/male.B/images/bower_lester_leroy/03-40980.pdf

We find, and the record amply supports, the evidence against Bower was simply overwhelming. For the purposes of disposing of this claim, we will briefly reiterate the evidence
brought against Bower seriatim:

(1) distinct ammunition --Julio Fiocchi .22 caliber ammunition -- similar to the type used in the execution-style murders was found in Bower’s home;

(2) Bower had several conversations with one of the murder victims days before the murders, inquiring about purchasing the ultralight aircraft;

(3) on the day of the murders, the four victims were to meet with a potential buyer, in the hangar owned by Bobby Glen Tate;

(4) a subsequent search of Bower’s home recovered two ultralight tires and rims that had the name “Tate” scratched in them;

(5) during the search of Bower’s home, investigators also discovered unidentified blood stains on his boots and travel bag;

(6) ultralight aircraft materials were discovered in Bower’s garage area;

(7) fingerprints of one of the murder victims were found on ultralight tubing found in his garage;

(8) he possessed a receipt for a silencer;

(9) numerous magazine articles were found within Bower’s home related to
the commission of murder; and

(10) in the days preceding the murders, Bower went to a shooting
range and practiced firing .22 caliber ammunition for approximately fifteen minutes.
The DA had evidences to show that he murdered 4 men so his lawyer failed to show evidences that he didn't murder them.
 
Thats not the point, the point is there is always *WHAT IF*, once executed we can NOT take it back. Thus why I don't think execution is good idea. There is no justice, no closure, no NOTHING if one executed and the guilty one is free on street ready to strike others... Where is justice when this happens?
Oh, you don't support death penalty?
 
Does not matter, there have been cases where DA do hide real evidence, have it happened? I can easily bet on it.

There have been cases where there is evidence all over only to find out the real perpetrator years later.

Most evidences is based on just professional opinion, it does not always means fact. Execution based on professional opinion... do you trust these professionals? Lastly there are cases where DA were busted for not being ethical, messed up evidences, favortism, etc is all but too common.

The ONLY time I support execution is when perpetrator actually commits horrendous crime and gets executed at that moment, location of the crime scene. Its almost impossible to make mistake when one raped a child and gets killed at the spot, that's the real justice, not bust later on and get executed.

http://murderpedia.org/male.B/b/bower-lester-leroy.htm

http://murderpedia.org/male.B/images/bower_lester_leroy/03-40980.pdf

The DA had evidences to show that he murdered 4 men so his lawyer failed to show evidences that he didn't murder them.
 
Does not matter, there have been cases where DA do hide real evidence, have it happened? I can easily bet on it.

There have been cases where there is evidence all over only to find out the real perpetrator years later.

Most evidences is based on just professional opinion, it does not always means fact. Execution based on professional opinion... do you trust these professionals? Lastly there are cases where DA were busted for not being ethical, messed up evidences, favortism, etc is all but too common.
What about forensic science? Fact or opinion?
 
My advice when it comes to execution, do NOT act like if your God. Best leave to God on judging. Thats why I won't act like God so therefore I have no right in taking somebody's life when there is no threat against me... END OF STORY.
 
My advice when it comes to execution, do NOT act like if your God. Best leave to God on judging. Thats why I won't act like God so therefore I have no right in taking somebody's life when there is no threat against me... END OF STORY.
No, it's a kind of punishment for murder.

If you don't want to kill a person who raped or murdered your wife (not you), that's your decision. A court where there's a death penalty can make a decision without you.
 
Back
Top