- Joined
- May 27, 2012
- Messages
- 4,982
- Reaction score
- 83
It is only error to you, by your definition.
Ephebophilia - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
There are many AD members became ill of your comment.
One thing you have to understand is just because something is "commonly used" doesn't mean it's used correctly. Pedophilia - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
As a medical diagnosis, pedophilia (USA spelling) or paedophilia (British spelling) is a psychiatric disorder in persons 16 years of age or older typically characterized by a primary or exclusive sexual interest toward prepubescent children (generally age 11 years or younger, though specific diagnostic criteria for the disorder extends the cut-off point for prepubescence to age 13)
In popular usage, the word pedophilia is often incorrectly used to mean any sexual interest in children or the act of child sexual abuse.[3][6][7][8] For example, The American Heritage Stedman's Medical Dictionary states, "Pedophilia is the act or fantasy on the part of an adult of engaging in sexual activity with a child or children."[9] This common use sometimes conflates the sexual interest in and sexual contact with pubescent or post-pubescent minors.[10][11] Researchers recommend that these imprecise uses be avoided because although people who commit child sexual abuse against prepubescent children sometimes exhibit the disorder,[6][12][13] many child sexual abuse offenders do not meet the clinical diagnosis standards for pedophilia and these standards pertain to prepubescents
and from the section misuse of medical terminolgy......
The words pedophile and pedophilia are sometimes used informally to describe an adult's sexual interest or attraction to pubescent or post-pubescent teenagers and to other situations that do not fit within the clinical definitions. The terms hebephilia or ephebophilia may be more accurate in these cases.[3][13][32] This was especially seen in the case of Mark Foley during the congressional page incident. Most of the media labeled Foley a pedophile, which led David Tuller of Slate magazine to state that Foley was not a pedophile but rather an ephebophile.[119]
Another common usage of pedophilia is to refer to the actus reus itself (that is, interchangeably with "sexual abuse")[3][7][8][9] rather than the medical meaning, which is a preference for that age group on the part of the older individual.[10][11] There are also situations where the terms are misused to refer to relationships where the younger person is an adult of legal age, but is either perceived socially as being too young in comparison to their older partner, or the older partner occupies a position of authority over them.[120][121] Researchers recommend that the above imprecise uses be avoided.[10][32] The Mayo Clinic states that pedophilia "is not a criminal or legal term".[13]
Yes i posted that term early in this thread. no one should be ill at any of my comments. again for what its worth my stance is he does not deserve life in prison.
Heres the thing, by having life in prison for asking to see pictures of teenage breast, you are by the law of unintended consequences making teenage girls less safe.
Due to this
Once guys realize they will get less time for rape (who gets life for rape?) but will get life for asking to see pictures, as what some here have done, Then the one wishing to see the pictures will easily decide to rape instead. after all its far less time. thats that.
The above has a name in criminology but you'll have do a little studying, if you want to know the ramifications of demanding life in prison for people. without having a grasp of consequences.
It doesn't just effect them nor the victims, it has a watering down effect on all other offenses. and by extension actually waters down the notion of a deterrent.
Indeed. the logic is sound though cold. If your going to get life, but maybe just get a dime (10 years) for murder (many do) then mine as well murder her, save yourself allot of time. you will be out sooner for murder then for asking to see pictures.
That is how cons think. That is how the system is designed. When you make a game of peoples lives by attaching numbers to offenses, many people then will learn to play the game. and many by extension will get very good at doing it.
its just a thought to chew on.
i also want to extend my apology to everyone in this thread. i fi offended and i know i have, i am sorry. sometimes my fingers get carried away. for those who have become sick of of my replies. i am sorry. and ask here for your forgiveness in this.
Hoichi
I don't think you should apologize hoichi. They're just being overzealous. You didn't say that what he did was okay, just that asking for life imprisonment is excessive. He is in fact not a pedophile. Phillia means an attraction to something, the prefixes define what age group that attraction is. Pedophilia is not the sexual abuse of children, it's the attraction to them. Any acts by an adult on those attractions is abuse. AND his attraction is to post pubescent girls. This knee jerk out for blood lock him up and never let him out attitude is lynch mobbish and short sighted. The punishment does not fit the crime. It is very important the punishment fit the crime. They may not think there's a difference between sexual abusing, touching raping a 6 yer old and asking a post pubescent girl for a picture of her boobs....but there is.
There are even different levels and crime for when you kill someone. 1st 2nd 3rd degree murder, manslaughter etc etc etc. Those differences are important.
This has to be one of the most stupid arguments I've ever seen. For one thing him going to prison is a nonissue. it wouldn't happen. But the people asking for it, wanting it, is rather mind boggling and it's a mockery of our justice system. Mark even thinks he should be imprisoned so he doesn't do anything worse. So we should imprison someone before they actually do something, because we think they might? Isn't this America? That's a damn slippery slope.