- Joined
- Apr 27, 2007
- Messages
- 69,284
- Reaction score
- 142
We will sign in ASL. Later guys.
practice ASL with me!
We will sign in ASL. Later guys.
Nobody here is saying that you're an audist. What they are trying to say is - They are also reconciling their experience that is correlated with this subject.
We all have tried to understand where you are exactly coming from and maybe in exchange for that - You could try and at least give it a chance for others to be able to correlate with this.
So with that, It may seem like you are being attacked about this but it is not at all in the sort for this.
so you believe bibi school and ASL that does impede speech development... but Jillio's son can do oral. What about Heather Whitestone?
Not being attacked? I was told to get off the forum and spend time with my daughter. That is implying that I am a lazy mom. That is totally unacceptable. People here don't know me and should not accuse me of that.
I have never advocated an oral only enviroment for any child or recommended that anyone get their child an implant. I do however tell each person I meet with a child with a hearing loss that ASL was the best decision we ever made.
it's just one angry comment. we all get hot-headed and we do say stuff that we don't mean it.Not being attacked? I was told to get off the forum and spend time with my daughter. That is implying that I am a lazy mom. That is totally unacceptable. People here don't know me and should not accuse me of that.
yes I do know that. but hey.... you are Missy's mom and only you know the best for your child. it's just that we don't agree with some of your perspective and approach for future goal because we all have been thru it and we're trying to tell you that it doesn't work. It's the same old cycle that keeps repeating.I have never advocated an oral only enviroment for any child or recommended that anyone get their child an implant. I do however tell each person I meet with a child with a hearing loss that ASL was the best decision we ever made.
I never said that, and I thought Heather Whitestone grew up oral? Maybe I'm wrong about that. Nope, I looked and her site says she didn't learn ASL until 11th grade.
The study didn't say that signers can't speak, but that those in an oral enviroment speak better than those in a TC enviroment.
Well, that is good. So why are you insisting that you want to go back to old days of mainstream school with oral only method and no ASl all on account of the research which does not mean any thing because it was written by a hearing author? I just don't understand your point.
I have seen some deaf people that grew up in a deaf school speak better than I do. I have grew up in an oral only enviroment. I feel the speech does depends on how well a person hears. Again... I will say it really depends on the type of hearing loss the child has to be able to learn and reconize speech and saying the words properly. The hearing loss is what impedes a childs speech. Your child is implanted so she will be able to hear and reconize some sounds.
I have seen some deaf people that grew up in a deaf school speak better than I do. I have grew up in an oral only enviroment. I feel the speech does depends on how well a person hears. Again... I will say it really depends on the type of hearing loss the child has to be able to learn and reconize speech and saying the words properly. The hearing loss is what impedes a childs speech. Your child is implanted so she will be able to hear and reconize some sounds.
I have seen some deaf people that grew up in a deaf school speak better than I do. I have grew up in an oral only enviroment. I feel the speech does depends on how well a person hears. Again... I will say it really depends on the type of hearing loss the child has to be able to learn and reconize speech and saying the words properly. The hearing loss is what impedes a childs speech. Your child is implanted so she will be able to hear and reconize some sounds.
well gee rick - maybe if you calm down and actually read word by word... you would see that Jillio is NOT talking about pitting against CI. Shel and Jillio have REPEATEDLY showed you that ORAL-FIRST approach is wrong and oxymoronic.
If you want to get a CI. fine. HA, fine. point is - the oral-first approach was wrong and we deafies have posted our life stories about the result of oral-first approach.
Perhaps if you had read the post "word by word" you might have been able to understand the point.
There is one thing of which I am certain, having raised a daughter who is oral and having been around oral deaf adults and children for over two decades, is that oral langauge as one's primary language can have both positive and negative impacts upon the lives of deaf people. Just like other approaches.
The approach is neither "wrong" and certainly not "oxymoronic" but the claims by those who dismiss it outright and refuse to admit that for some it has proved to be beneficial is indeed moronic.
BTW Heather Whitestone was raised oral first and my source is her mother who I had the opportunity to meet and talk at length to.
faire_jour,
Why are you looking for opinions here?
Why not seek out Deaf people in your own community? Living breathing people. Do you realize that as the parent of a deaf child you would be welcomed?
I agree that how well a child hears determines, in many cases, how well they will speak. That is the reasoning behind the CI. My daughter can now hear all speech sounds and can tell the differece between them.
Still getting information from second hand sources rather than from the deaf individual themselves. Not very valid or reliable.
As I have stated at least one hundred thosand times. my family is part of our local Deaf community. We went to an activity Friday night, and a Deaf church this morning.
Exactly. So since she can hear the sounds and reconize certain sounds. She will learn to speak. Her speech and voice will not be the same as a hearing voice. Even with a CI. So it will be still somewhat impeded. That is why she probably take speech therapy (correct me if I am wrong)