- Joined
- Jan 2, 2008
- Messages
- 3,418
- Reaction score
- 7
That should be obvious. If the hearing loss is so minimal that not much (if any) outside help is needed, then it's not what we're discussing. It would be a moot point. You're looking for something to nitpick because you're not being told what you want to hear on this forum. I think it's fairly obvious that when we refer to children with hearing losses that should be educated in a deaf school or have all access to language including ASL, we are discussing those who need to have that.
The educational experience that's right for each child is not a slam dunk answer: a deaf residential school with ASL is not right for every deaf child but may be perfect for one in particular, or for many. A bi-bi school may be wrong for one deaf child, but may fit another child to a T. An aural or oral education may be perfect for one child, dead wrong for another. And so on, and so on. And the different educational experiences may be right at different times for an individual child: my child may be thriving in a bi-bi environment, and yet, in 2 years, we may find that she is suffering, in the wrong place, that services or needs have changed.
Every parent has the right and the responsibility to find the right educational environment for his or her child. You have a very valid experience of your own to impart, and I, for one, want to know what you have encountered. But you can't possibly think that you have any deep knowledge of FJ's child or of my child and what her needs are, and unless you have spent a considerable amount of time with our children -- live -- you really can't possibly have enough information on which to base a recommendation.