faire_jour
New Member
- Joined
- Apr 26, 2008
- Messages
- 7,188
- Reaction score
- 3
Yes. Will you like to talk to me that way if we are in the same room?
I text people in the same room everyday.
Yes. Will you like to talk to me that way if we are in the same room?
Yes. Will you like to talk to me that way if we are in the same room?
Yes. Will you like to talk to me that way if we are in the same room?
only if you came with me
Several people including myself have. You haven't acknowledged them.
I'm waving my granny cane at you, whippersnapper.
I text people in the same room everyday.
And I take what you say with a grain of salt as well. It would kill your job and you are clearly concerned about what will happen to your community and language if kids don't learn ASL.
Are you actually saying that ASL has no downsides? If ASL is a child's first language, ALL reading and testing will forever be in their second language. That can't possibly be part of the problem?? What about the fact that kids who don't hear have trouble with phonemic awareness (rhyming and the such), that couldn't be part of the issue either? How about the fact that since there are SO MANY English words that do not have exact ASL translations, so the vocabulary of ASL and English are very different (Sign for coat, jacket, hoodie, windbreaker, pullover, etc). Could that be a problem? Nah, it is only oralism....
Life is looking up! There are at least 4 people in this thread who would humor me in my preferred mode of communication. Grendel, of course you would need to watch spelling.
I am just as annoying in real life.
punctuation, too, I suppose?
I believe some deaf people would use abbreviation for little kids to use if they can't spell it out in ASL.. or sign it conceptually sign ASL is visual and not an english word. And I asked about rhyming before, so if you want to know, read this: To the fireflies by John Carlin : Education of deaf children: Evidence ... - Google Books
and ASL will evolve. afterall we did have a sign language for computers now.
And I take what you say with a grain of salt as well. It would kill your job and you are clearly concerned about what will happen to your community and language if kids don't learn ASL.
Are you actually saying that ASL has no downsides? If ASL is a child's first language, ALL reading and testing will forever be in their second language. That can't possibly be part of the problem?? What about the fact that kids who don't hear have trouble with phonemic awareness (rhyming and the such), that couldn't be part of the issue either? How about the fact that since there are SO MANY English words that do not have exact ASL translations, so the vocabulary of ASL and English are very different (Sign for coat, jacket, hoodie, windbreaker, pullover, etc). Could that be a problem? Nah, it is only oralism....
Computers is a good one, but why does every board book have to have an aardvark in it? Does ANYONE know that sign?
I think you can absolutely tell a brilliant story in ASL. The difficulty I have is in telling the story as written, developing the same vocabulary, so that upon reading the story herself, my daughter will make the connection between the very specific word she knows as a concept and the written word on the page. If she knows seafoam as X (how would you sign that?), there's no connection with the written word on the page.
And ASL doesn't reject some spelling, PFH, right?
My daughter continually corrects my hand placement.
And ASL doesn't reject some spelling, PFH, right?
nope not at all. you know it.
And ASL doesn't reject some spelling, PFH, right?