Selective abortion.

Status
Not open for further replies.
If you allow parents to kill the baby because baby is disabled , then would you allow parents to make same decision when baby grows up and now five years old? Can we kill disabled kids and end their misery?

unfortunately.... as agreed and officially recognized by the majority... and by medical and scientific community..... and by government..... and by Supreme Court that the fetus does not have any legal rights and is not recognized as a person with legal rights. A 5 years old child is recognized as a living person with legal rights. Killing him would result in criminal charge - a murder - as defined by law. Abortion is not a murder as stated by law.

However - if that disabled child is on life support machine.... you as the parents have legal rights to decide on his/her fate.
 
Okay... One thing come up from my mind...

If a disabled/sick child is more work harder than a 'normal' child... What kind of a society are we creating by aborting off sick or disabled human beings? If we abort the sick/disabled human being instead of attempting to cure the sickness or support & assistance disability needs, then what is the point of hospitals?

There are disabled people that are functioning well in this society but the fact is that it all boils down to a woman's decision, not yours or mine. If the woman is ready to raise a disabled child and believes he'll be productive, then what rights do we have to tell them otherwise?

Again, an aborted fetus is not going anywhere. It's gone for good. Move on.
 
unfortunately.... as agreed and officially recognized by the majority... and by medical and scientific community..... and by government..... and by Supreme Court that the fetus does not have any legal rights and is not recognized as a person with legal rights. A 5 years old child is recognized as a living person with legal rights. Killing him would result in criminal charge - a murder - as defined by law. Abortion is not a murder as stated by law.

However - if that disabled child is on life support machine.... you as the parents have legal rights to decide on his/her fate.

Legal rights are not the issue. Couple hundred years ago some people didnt have legal rights either because of their color . It was legal to kill them as long as you own them. It was the same argument. My slave, my choice.

Leave the laws aside, share your own thoughts and feelings. Laws change from time to time , period to period. There is no need to hide behind them. You see that egg becomes a real baby after a while. Its not much different than a 5 months old or 5 years old . You see it. Now knowing this, are you granting parents right to kill their kids if it was up to you?

-
 
There are disabled people that are functioning well in this society but the fact is that it all boils down to a woman's decision, not yours or mine. If the woman is ready to raise a disabled child and believes he'll be productive, then what rights do we have to tell them otherwise?

Again, an aborted fetus is not going anywhere. It's gone for good. Move on.

Er, I stood on my POV as an opinion... ^_^;;
 
No.

It's not a "baby" until it's detached from the host. :)

Lets argue it. What makes you a human being? You carry all the features of human, right? That unborn baby carries it too. You are a separate living organism. That baby is a separate living organism too, but still grows in her mother. If you could provide her same conditions you could take her out of her mothers womb and let her grow outside.

Please help me to understand , its not a baby a day before she was born but it is a day after. What exactly is the difference? And please provide a real difference, not a textbook definition.

-
 
Legal rights are not the issue. Couple hundred years ago some people didnt have legal rights either because of their color . It was legal to kill them as long as you own them. It was the same argument. My slave, my choice.
um.... that is different and fallacious. Slavery is the issue of racism and discrimination. This is no different from Islamic women having no rights at all. Slaves and Islamic women are the individuals with conscious and soul. Fetus inside mother's belly does not. Fetus cannot express emotion nor communicate with anybody. The fetus inside mother should be left up to mother's choice on abortion.

Leave the laws aside, share your own thoughts and feelings. Laws change from time to time , period to period. There is no need to hide behind them. You see that egg becomes a real baby after a while. Its not much different than a 5 months old or 5 years old . You see it. Now knowing this, are you granting parents right to kill their kids if it was up to you?

absolutely. nothing will change my mind. I surely damn well want a choice to myself as a (future) parent to decide on my child's well-being if he/she's in coma, living on life support machine. I surely damn well want a choice to myself to decide on abortion if the doctor (and 2nd opinion doctor) have told me that the baby is diagnosed with ----- defect... that the baby will die at age of 3 years old.

Hand off my choice. Period. Worry about yourself and your own child, not ours.
 
absolutely. nothing will change my mind. I surely damn well want a choice to myself as a (future) parent to decide on my child's well-being if he/she's in coma, living on life support machine. I surely damn well want a choice to myself to decide on abortion if the doctor (and 2nd opinion doctor) have told me that the baby is diagnosed with ----- defect... that the baby will die at age of 3 years old.

Hand off my choice. Period.

These are your conditions and another parent can say they want to have a choice to kill their kid when they cant feed him anymore or if he doesnt clean his room well enough. Its a choice, conditions can change. Yours are not more noble than anybody else's. So there is no need to create special conditions. You are saying parents own the kids and should have right to kill them when they see fit.

Ok , perhaps one day it will happen too.

-
 
These are your conditions and another parent can say they want to have a choice to kill their kid when they cant feed him anymore or if he doesnt clean his room well enough. Its a choice, conditions can change. Yours are not more noble than anybody else's. So there is no need to create special conditions. You are saying parents own the kids and should have right to kill them when they see fit.

Ok , perhaps one day it will happen too.

-

Conditions? No it's called freedom of choice... the rights. I'm sorry but your example about killing the child just because they can't feed him or if he doesn't clean his room well enough is ludicrous\ and outrageous. It's not even a comparison at all. This is not even remotely close to abortion subject. Please stick to topic... which is abortion.

and there's no "perhaps it will happen." To say that is equivalent to saying the planets revolve around Earth. Remember back in old days where everything was explained religiously? masturbation's a sin? gay's a sin? Creationism? Yea there you go. A more correct prediction would be is... "perhaps the religion will be forgotten as the world has become more logical and scientifical." but hey - that's just my opinion. We're going forward, not backward to the time where everything was explained by religion and bible.

again - thanks goodness that the world isn't controlled by Vatican City anymore. the life would be like barbaric medieval age! no worse than Bush Administration!
 
Conditions? No it's called freedom of choice... the rights. I'm sorry but your example about killing the child just because they can't feed him or if he doesn't clean his room well enough is ludicrous and outrageous. It's not even a comparison at all. This is not even remotely close to abortion subject. Please stick to topic... which is abortion.

Of course it is on topic.. The reasons you gave are valid for you but some people dont approve them here. And you do not approve when a parent wants to kill his child because they cant feed him. There are some people find it outrageous when you want to abort a baby. They are no different than you reacting my example right now. See its all subjective. If you respect choices when it comes to "killing", you should respect other people's choices to kill too. Their reason doesnt have to match your morals as yours dont match some other people's.

Once egg becomes an unborn baby who has all her organs, who breaths, who gets fed, who moves, who feels (do you think babies gain to ability to feel the very moment they are pushed out their mother's body and start crying? try and see if a premature born baby can feel) killing is killing. Its different than aborting the fertilized egg at the first stage. So if killing by choice is Ok, it shouldnt only depend on Jiro's own moral. It should be OK..

Its a choice, why did you suddenly find it outrages?
-
 
I am not against aborting the embryo itself at the first stage. Abortion is not limited to that though. They allow it until 24th week, we are discussing here 30th week abortion for disable babies. I am posting 3 pictures . They are from 20 weeks, 25 weeks, and 30 weeks (from up to down). Please put all names a side. It doesnt matter if we call it fetus or baby or human. Look at what you are seeing. This is not a little embryo, what you see can not be taken out of woman's body in one piece. Please read how a doctor describes the operation that takes place after 12th week:

But in the Dispatches programme, Dr Spencer will break a huge medical taboo and spell out exactly what happens. Though we do not show the aborted foetus, what viewers will see and hear may very well shock them, but it is a vital contribution to the whole debate.

In the first 12 weeks or so of pregnancy, doctors can use a simple suction procedure. After that, the surgery becomes more complicated.

"The foetus can't come out in one go. We haven't dilated sufficiently for that. The foetal parts are soft enough to break apart as they are being removed..."

In other words, he has to dismember the foetus inside the uterus and pull it out, bit by bit. He uses an ultrasound scan to guide him. Even then, some body parts are too large to come out intact.
What REALLY happens during an abortion: One surgeon finally tells the truth | Mail Online
So Jillo, Jiro, Jolie, (I am calling your names because I know you, I am not doing it for targeting you) you are all saying this option should be given to mothers . But all these arguments sound like academic discussions. They are based on concepts, definitions, we make it sound like its about democracy, its about defending the freedom. Lets say you have this freedom (which you have), which one of you can really go through it if they were going to give you remainings of the baby after abortion , so you could bury? Jillo, Jolie, you both have kids. Look at these pictures. If they were your daughters, which one you could be there and see their body on the table? Look into their eyes. They have eyes , you see it? It is easy (well not really, but relatively) when a woman goes to clinic and sleeps for couple hours during the operation and comes back home with no baby inside. She doesnt think (or tries not to think) on what really happens there. But how many people can really face the reality. See it, touch it, carry it, bury it?

I think you should go to a clinic and ask permission for watching an abortion. You should take this fetus , baby whatever you want to call it and carry it yourself where they dump it . You should put your hands onto it , and then decide for yourself . Only then you can really make a choice, and it becomes a conscious choice. But please dont turn this into an intellectual argument where the textbook definitions are more important than actual reality. If he doesnt look like a baby in the pictures, if the doctor sounds like lying, go to a clinic and watch it, touch it yourself. See what it looks like, see if he can bleed, see what happens to him.

I think abortion should be allowed, but they should require mothers to watch one abortion operation before their own and also they should give their own babies remanings to them so parents can bury him. Anybody who can face with reality of their actions should be allowed to have abortion.

Then women can make conscious choices on how to practice safe sex, or at what stage of pregnancy they will go to clinic or how they will keep the baby and raise it. Then it would really be their choice and they would live with it. Then we can talk about "choice"..

I am not against freedom , if you have read my other posts in AD you would notice that. Have all the freedom you want and make a choice. I just want you to face with the choice. Not here on AD as a intellectual argument one's logic will beat the other, but in real life as an actual , undeniable reality. What ever you choose afterwards, I respect that.


Hermes


(Mod's Edit: inappropriate images are removed)

I am adding links to images that show 20-25-30 weeks ultrasounds as requested. These are the pictures of alive, healthy babies in the womb , they should be considered happy moments , but if its considered inappropriate , I wont argue over it.. Please view and see for yourself.

http://i5.ebayimg.com/02/i/05/e1/c7/47_2.JPG

http://i7.ebayimg.com/04/i/000/77/c6/561d_1_sbl.JPG

http://i21.ebayimg.com/02/i/05/db/15/d7_1_sbl.JPG
 
Last edited:
unfortunately.... as agreed and officially recognized by the majority... and by medical and scientific community..... and by government..... and by Supreme Court that the fetus does not have any legal rights and is not recognized as a person with legal rights. A 5 years old child is recognized as a living person with legal rights. Killing him would result in criminal charge - a murder - as defined by law. Abortion is not a murder as stated by law.

However - if that disabled child is on life support machine.... you as the parents have legal rights to decide on his/her fate.

There's a grey/gray area being swum into by the state of Maryland in that they've a law where a pregnant mother's murder can be charged as a double homicide.
 
Mild and moderately disabled fetuses ARE being aborted including those that are Deaf/blind. It does NOT just affect the severely disabled whatever you may think. So that is why we SHOULD be against the killing of disabled fetuses. Plus these tests often don't measure severity of a disability. Rubella damage for instance. You can be severely brain damaged and need lifelong care with Rubella damage. You can also be just Deaf or visually impaired from rubella damage. Tests won't show that. Now do you understand?

So, you're saying that if they'd have the resources available (i.e., better testing), you'd support?
 
Legal rights are not the issue. Couple hundred years ago some people didnt have legal rights either because of their color . It was legal to kill them as long as you own them. It was the same argument. My slave, my choice.

Leave the laws aside, share your own thoughts and feelings. Laws change from time to time , period to period. There is no need to hide behind them. You see that egg becomes a real baby after a while. Its not much different than a 5 months old or 5 years old . You see it. Now knowing this, are you granting parents right to kill their kids if it was up to you?

-

:gpost:
 
There are disabled people that are functioning well in this society but the fact is that it all boils down to a woman's decision, not yours or mine. If the woman is ready to raise a disabled child and believes he'll be productive, then what rights do we have to tell them otherwise?

Again, an aborted fetus is not going anywhere. It's gone for good. Move on.

Good Point Jeff ! :D

The decision is end !!!
 
Lets argue it. What makes you a human being? You carry all the features of human, right? That unborn baby carries it too. You are a separate living organism. That baby is a separate living organism too, but still grows in her mother. If you could provide her same conditions you could take her out of her mothers womb and let her grow outside.

Please help me to understand , its not a baby a day before she was born but it is a day after. What exactly is the difference? And please provide a real difference, not a textbook definition.

-

Biology 101.

Anytime you have a organism latched onto the host to get nutrients from it, it's known as a parasite.

Once the parasite is detached from the organism--in this situation--it's a human being.

Can't understand it? Sorry you didn't pass Biology. :)
 
There are disabled people that are functioning well in this society but the fact is that it all boils down to a woman's decision, not yours or mine. If the woman is ready to raise a disabled child and believes he'll be productive, then what rights do we have to tell them otherwise?

Again, an aborted fetus is not going anywhere. It's gone for good. Move on.

I asked this question before and no one was able to answer: what if the man wants it and the woman doesn't? Should she be inconvenienced to carry it full term for the man or abort it?
 
Biology 101.

Anytime you have a organism latched onto the host to get nutrients from it, it's known as a parasite.

Once the parasite is detached from the organism--in this situation--it's a human being.

Can't understand it? Sorry you didn't pass Biology. :)


So I say a 8 months of fetus is a baby. You are saying its a parasite. I dont pass biology.

Ok no problem, I am glad to fail..:)

-
 
So I say a 8 months of fetus is a baby. You are saying its a parasite. I dont pass biology.

Ok no problem, I am glad to fail..:)

-

You should know that in the field of Science, emotion isn't involved.

Logic is.

This is an area where you and others are allowing yourself to be clouded.
 
So I say a 8 months of fetus is a baby. You are saying its a parasite. I dont pass biology.

Ok no problem, I am glad to fail..:)

-

You should know that in the field of Science, emotion isn't involved.

Logic is.

This is an area where you and others are allowing yourself to be clouded.

and that's why Supreme Court ruled in favor of abortion. It's a win-win for all. Imposing one's belief for all is un-American.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top