I am not worried. My sister has a small part of me from our mother. My half-brother has a small part of me from our biological dad. So whatever traits we have in common will be passed on. Even if the immediate blood relatives don't produce a heir, keep extending the definition of family until one gets to the offspring that do survive.
I disagree. We left the age of eugenics behind us. The Renaissance taught us to admire the human spirit. We had the Enlightenment which gave us modern democracy. Current economic theories are showing that the carrot-and-stick can only go so far, and after that it's a virtue of self-improvement-- this is something 20th century economists would call us insane for.
Sure we had to back peddle out of the Old Progressivism of yogurt enemas, acidic masturbation and processed cornflakes, but not all is lost-- we learned from those mistakes and some the discoveries back then set a foundation for today.
In a figurative sense while taking the reading the word "afterlife" literally. See, we don't just die. When we die, then others benefit from what we left behind and we become the next generation. I left my mark, and I am immortalized; even if no one knows who I am.
To think "we die, and worms eat our corpse" is rather a grim and simplistic way of seeing thing. If it's that simple, then everyone in the world would commit suicide upon understanding such thing. Instead, every one of us understand we are all interconnected. I means, why else would people donate to Haiti? Hurricane Kristina?
It's much more complex than rotting in the ground. When we die, our body nourishes the earth, which in turn give food back to nature and nature utilize our matters. When we die, our ideas are left behind. Even if our works didn't survive or were not recorded, we supported the people whose works did survive.
\