For the record,
I am NOT HARRASSING anybody.
I am
trying desperately to get my point accros, albeit I wonder now why do I even bother. Please do NOT accuse me of doing something I am NOT doing Angel. You keep challenging MY replies, treat me not nice. Whenever you have an opportunity you put me down. You're no angel.
This is public forum. Please allow me to defend myself and my opinions. Just because I have strong arguments does not mean I am harrasing.
Obviously neither you Angel nor you Liebling want to admit that perhaps you were not entirely right about answering Mookie. Neither Angel nor Liebling answered Mookie question anyway:
""WHAT IF Tracy's mother got restraining order against Tracy's boyfriend?""
Why should we answer Mookie´s hypothetical and comparing question?
Just answer the question please, do not compare, analyze, explain-
JUST PLEASE ANSWER. Then you will KNOW.
No, I do not compare. Why should I? I only tried to answer your and Mookie´s hypothetic question.
yes you are, in here:
How do you know that Tracy´s boyfriend is same as mother´s daughter´s boyfriend?
That is comparing. That is NOT what Mookie wanted. If you answered to Mookie question above by now you know what the answer is, and that is what Mookie wanted to point out.
It look like that Mookie tried to compare Tracy´s boyfriend with daughter´s boyfriend which is not acceptance.
No, Mookie just wanted to say if the mother- ANY mother- won't intervene
on her children behalf, the consequences
could be dire. No less, no more.
Just an argument- example pro RO.
Boyfriend´s mother CONVINCED him to let daughter go. Got it?
I am horrified. Do you realise what you just wrote? Basically that the BF forbid the girl to see her Grandma and let her go only when his mother CONVINCED him to let her go.. Got it??? do you realise what does that mean??
No, please go back to my first thread. Mookie use Tracy an example because Angel and I disagreed with mother for threat her daughter to get RO. Angel responsed Mookie´s post telling him that she do not give him an answer about Tracy because it is not relate on my thread. What she answered is CORRECT to leave Tracy out of my thread
Again, Mookie used Tracys as na example what can happen when mother step back and do nothing. It is related to the thread only as an argument and anybody could have been an example, not only Tracy- anybody who's been abused and whose mother did nothing.
Every parent´s decision what they do with their children. I do not influence on their decision but respect them when I see different view as them.
So, would you let your 16 old daughter drop off school, risk get pregnant and marry an abusive bum because that is HER choice?
Unfortunlately no, it´s YOU who jumped in first place and lecture me and Angel because you think Angel and I misunderstand Mookie´s post.
I am sorry but to me it looks like you still do not understand fully.
It´s you who jumped and lecture me and Angel about Mookie´s post in first place, that´s because we tried to not answer Mookie´s illogical question.
Mookie post was NOT illogical and all I wanted to do was explain THAT.. sigh I give up..
BTW you keep saying Liebling that abusers do not show their true face until they are married or something.
Well I watched a lot of shows on the subject with psychologists explaining warning signs, and also read a bit on the subject.
The signs are always there, but you have to know them.
In this story of the mother with 16 y.o there are too only you need to pay attention.
Another problem is the whole family of the girl was dysfunctional, and even if the mother was right about not trusting the boyfriend of course her daughter was against her anyway.
But that is another story.
Fuzzy