Wow, really? I know two families from my area who are hearing but did "no speech" with their Deaf kids. But yeah.....it does seem like 98% of the time with non orally skilled kids, its Deaf of Deaf families....and a lot of times with ASL only from a hearing family, there's additional circumstances (like the kid has a tracheostomy or significent apraxia/speech issues ) Despite what AG Bell thinksI totally agree. This is what has been so hard for us with Katie. We got a lot of overly concerned comments when we dropped speech. The teacher who was around when the DHH program was set up said she didn't think there had been more than 4-5 "no speech" kids in the district in almost 20 years and never one from a hearing family.
most of us DO get a really hefty dose of speech therapy.
I do think it's a good thing that you're being very child focused...basicly following Katie rather then FORCING it when there's really little to no benifit. Almost like unschooling. Things may change when you guys transfer to Wisconsin School for the Deaf. The speech therapist there may be able to help her more then the general speech therapists you've seen.
and faire joure yes I know that other kids get picked on. I attended school in a VERY VERY snotty area. BUT, dhh kids don't just get teased. There is a HUGE difference between normal childhood teasing and the HELL those of us who are dhh mainstreamed (or otherwise obviously "different") go through. A lot of times it emotionally stunts us b/c we don't get the normal social emotional development that other kids do.
A BIG part of the reason why I disagree with a kneejerk "regular classes regular school with minimal accomondations and oral only is b/c the parents who chose those options seem to have this fanasty that their kid's experiance in the mainstream and being oral will allow them to be a part of this glorious suburban perfect world fanasty.
Just b/c we're on the same "bus" it doesn't mean we get the same benifit. Too often dhh kids get sent to the back of the bus!