Political Scientist: Republicans Most Conservative They've Been In 100 Years

[rolling7]

Sorry but you don't make a rule

So why do you get to slander and I can't criticize? And since you cannot point out exactly what AD rule I've violated.... you appeared to be confusing yourself.

In case you mises it: "otherwise violative of any laws"

Last I heard slander is a violation of laws.

Personally calling a person "a con man" without any proof/evidence that you personally have means slander.

 

[Foxrac]

In case you mises it: "otherwise violative of any laws"

Last I heard slander is a violation of laws.

Personally calling a person "a con man" without any proof/evidence that you personally have means slander.

Hello rolling7,

Please refrain from attacking members and you are subjecting to follow Alldeaf forum rules.

I don't care about whoever call slander and you are not police officer nor is prosecutor, even Jiro is expressing his freedom of speech.

 

[rolling7]

Hello rolling7,

Please refrain from attacking members and you are subjecting to follow Alldeaf forum rules.

I don't care about whoever call slander and you are not police officer nor is prosecutor, even Jiro is expressing his freedom of speech.

All members have freedom of speech but, as you said, the AllDeaf forum rules must be followed. You are correct, I'm not a police officer (as far as I know only airportcop is) but each and every member of AD must inform the Mods. of a violation of the rules. You yourself should have done this. That is not attacking a member, it is keeping AD on a level playing field. I have posted the rule that was violated and reported it to the Mod. The ball is in the Mod's court now.

 

[Jiro]

In case you mises it: "otherwise violative of any laws"

Last I heard slander is a violation of laws.

Personally calling a person "a con man" without any proof/evidence that you personally have means slander.

Please reread libel law because you're way off the base.

 

[Foxrac]

All members have freedom of speech but, as you said, the AllDeaf forum rules must be followed. You are correct, I'm not a police officer (as far as I know only airportcop is) but each and every member of AD must inform the Mods. of a violation of the rules. You yourself should have done this. That is not attacking a member, it is keeping AD on a level playing field. I have posted the rule that was violated and reported it to the Mod. The ball is in the Mod's court now.

The AD forum rule doesn't include slander.

Jiro is expressing his freedom of speech against conservative writer and it is just his opinion.

If you report the post so it means moderators are reviewing whichever is violation of forum rule or not. I found your report is ridiculous and Jiro hasn't done to break any rules.

 

[Jiro]

All members have freedom of speech but, as you said, the AllDeaf forum rules must be followed. You are correct, I'm not a police officer (as far as I know only airportcop is) but each and every member of AD must inform the Mods. of a violation of the rules. You yourself should have done this. That is not attacking a member, it is keeping AD on a level playing field. I have posted the rule that was violated and reported it to the Mod. The ball is in the Mod's court now.

please re-read new AD Rules

Trolling: The old definition of trolling meant of any kind of unwanted replies. Today, the term 'trolling' has different levels of variation on internet and requires judgement calls compared to years ago. Any moderator will hold the right to make a decision based on their perspective after responding to a trolling report. There are many actions that can be considered trolling, but not all of them face the same consequences.
If a member feels that a serious trolling case has not been reviewed, it is urged for them to contact us directly thru PM.

Member & Group callouts: If you want to argue with a member being racist, audist, pedophile, criminal, etc, this section applies for moderator actions. Present creditable posts to the moderators or Alex explaining the evidence for the claim, which will then be reviewed. With the Post Reporting feature, staff may disregard cases after determining them unfounded. It's important to provide details so we can investigate thoroughly and make a decision. Members that display obvious traces of criminal behavior, racism, hostility, may be immediately banned without warning.

you're borderline-trolling me. and you're unable to cite any specific AD Rule I have violated. and you're unable to meet specific legal parameters for slander. I find it comical that my criticism is considered a slander and your opinion is considered free speech.

it's best if you kindly STFU and walk away because you're being quite silly which can land you into a Ban Land.

 

[rolling7]

please re-read new ad rules

you're borderline-trolling me. And you're unable to cite any specific ad rule i have violated. And you're unable to meet specific legal parameters for slander. I find it comical that my criticism is considered a slander and your opinion is considered free speech.

It's best if you kindly stfu and walk away because you're being quite silly which can land you into a ban land.

see post #141

 

[Foxrac]

see post #141

Enough and enough.

Let forget about it and back on topic.

 

[Jiro]

see post #141

in case you didn't know.... the only person who can sue me or accuse me of slandering is the person himself that I "slandered", not you or anybody else.

and that person will have to prove to court that I have caused damage and/or economic loss due to my lies.

so now... roll along and find a common sense.

 

[naisho]

In case you mises it: "otherwise violative of any laws"
Last I heard slander is a violation of laws.
Personally calling a person "a con man" without any proof/evidence that you personally have means slander.

A serious case of slander/defamation on an internet forum, can be held in the court of law in the USA. A recent case happened in 2010, you can read the details here:
http://www.scubaboard.com/gundisuit.html

Should you find your case serious enough, I would encourage you to take personal recourse.

If you honestly believe your rights are violated, you can take legal action against your accusers, but the forum will always allow an objectivity for freedom of speech unless the moderators believe it's being done in destructive patterns that are not beneficial for discussion.

Disclaimer: I am not an attorney. You are not my client. I'm not making a case.

 

[Foxrac]

I'm going post a real issue with welfare program.

Some welfare programs have flaws and few policies are failed, for example, traditional public housing projects are biggest failure ever because all poor people are isolated in one location that where public housing projects are in. I don't blame on FDR and Democratic Party because they were necessary to rid of slums in urban area. They didn't know about long term effect in few decades later when crime, gangs, drugs are much higher in area with public housing projects located so some of public housing projects are replaced with mixed income housing under HOPE VI and it is very effective to have a mixed income housing. I support government to replace and expand the mixed income housing.

Section 8 has some flaws because there are many apartments in majority white cities do not accept Section 8 so make them looks racial profiling because majority of Section 8 are minorities. Section 8 has longer wait list due to limited funding and there are numerous poor people stuck with other way like live in poor condition housing or trailer or on street because public housing projects and Section 8 are full. It looks like our congress don't job to fix the flaws and we need find way to get people out of poverty so they can enjoy their own life.