Political Scientist: Republicans Most Conservative They've Been In 100 Years

Status
Not open for further replies.
I think you just enjoy keying "buffoon." :lol:

Anyway, as a conservative, I don't have a fascination or adoration for anyone on earth except Hubby. However, Sowell does bring up some excellent points. He is well grounded and not "out of touch" or delusional.

The Nobel Prize has lost its gleam is some areas. Honorary degrees are just that--symbolic honors. Almost every person of note who has given a speech at a university graduation ceremony gets one. Sometimes they get one for giving a chunk of money to the school. It proves nothing, one way or another.

You're thinking of Nobel Peace Prize.

but a Nobel Prize in economic? that's a whooooooooollllllllleeeeeee another world. it's actually a real deal.
 
THOMAS SOWELL

Thomas Sowell was born in North Carolina and grew up in Harlem. As with many others in his neighborhood, Thomas Sowell left home early and did not finish high school. The next few years were difficult ones, but eventually he joined the Marine Corps and became a photographer in the Korean War. After leaving the service, Thomas Sowell entered Harvard University, worked a part-time job as a photographer and studied the science that would become his passion and profession: economics.

After graduating magna cum laude from Harvard University (1958), Thomas Sowell went on to receive his master's in economics from Columbia University (1959) and a doctorate in economics from the University of Chicago (1968).

In the early '60s, Sowell held jobs as an economist with the Department of Labor and AT&T. But his real interest was in teaching and scholarship. In 1965, at Cornell University, Sowell began the first of many professorships. Thomas Sowell's other teaching assignments include Rutgers University, Amherst College, Brandeis University and the University of California at Los Angeles, where he taught in the early '70s and also from 1984 to 1989.

Thomas Sowell has published a large volume of writing. His dozen books, as well as numerous articles and essays, cover a wide range of topics, from classic economic theory to judicial activism, from civil rights to choosing the right college. Moreover, much of his writing is considered ground-breaking -- work that will outlive the great majority of scholarship done today.

Though Thomas Sowell had been a regular contributor to newspapers in the late '70s and early '80s, he did not begin his career as a newspaper columnist until 1984. George F. Will's writing, says Sowell, proved to him that someone could say something of substance in so short a space (750 words). And besides, writing for the general public enables him to address the heart of issues without the smoke and mirrors that so often accompany academic writing.

In 1990, he won the prestigious Francis Boyer Award, presented by The American Enterprise Institute.

Currently Thomas Sowell is a senior fellow at the Hoover Institute in Stanford, Calif.

Thomas Sowell - Conservative Columnist and Political Commentator2012 Column Archive2004 Column Archive2011 Column Archive2011 Column Archive

how limiting and out of touch he is. all he does is talk and write whatever he wants.

hint - Ben Bernanke
 
I'm required to back up my statement with some source in here and yet you felt no need to back up your statement with some source in other thread...... ooooohhhhh IIIIII ssssseeeeeeeee........



you get to slander Warren Christopher and I can't "slander" Thomas Sowell. ooooohhhhh IIIIII ssssseeeeeeeee........

FYI - I have not violated any AD rule since I have not made a slander against any ADer in here. You seem to be very confused about "slandering". It is typically illegal to slander against a person without proof if it resulted in economic loss and/or damage but it is not illegal to criticize about anybody else in typical discussion between people like ourselves. perhaps you missed my Post #111 where I've already backed up my statement.
Code:


Not again (part 2)!!! No, no. Your post #111 does not do anything to prove that Sowell is "a con man" and no, you don't used source to to back up YOUR statement. You called him "a con man" yourself and that is slander if you have no proof.
Of a source called Sowell "a con man" let that source back up their words. But you did not used a source and you made your own statement that Sowell is "a con man".

I have not slandered the Christopher Commission ai did post two serious questions about their flawed report. Even Naisho called it flawed.

BTW - can you cite exactly which AD rule have I violated? I don't see anywhere in there about slandering.

AD can not allow itself to be an instrument to commit slander neither by posting a slanderous statement about a member nor a non-member.
 
AD can not allow itself to be an instrument to commit slander neither by posting a slanderous statement about a member nor a non-member.

Sorry but you don't make a rule :aw:

So why do you get to slander and I can't criticize? And since you cannot point out exactly what AD rule I've violated.... you appeared to be confusing yourself.
 
Medicaid, food stamps, public housing, welfare, etc.

:dunno:

it's a personal choice so you'll have to ask them.
Well, you brought it up, so I thought you could elaborate on it.

"plus.... in the past - women did not have same career/life opportunity and equal rights as today."

If you say that having more career opportunities is one of the reasons why more women opt for single parenthood, I'm curious how that works. If they have more career opportunities, then they should be using less welfare and other social services, right?
 
Medicaid, food stamps, public housing, welfare, etc.
well it's not just for single mom. it's for everybody else.

Well, you brought it up, so I thought you could elaborate on it.

"plus.... in the past - women did not have same career/life opportunity and equal rights as today."

If you say that having more career opportunities is one of the reasons why more women opt for single parenthood, I'm curious how that works. If they have more career opportunities, then they should be using less welfare and other social services, right?
right. that's what social services are for. to help them get started.
 
well it's not just for single mom. it's for everybody else.
Yes, but the reference was to why there are more single mom's in American society today, compared to the past.

right. that's what social services are for. to help them get started.[/QUOTE]
Meaning social services help is for temporary use, not life-long, generation-to-generation use.
 
Yes, but the reference was to why there are more single mom's in American society today, compared to the past.
well it's certainly not because of social welfare programs.

Meaning social services help is for temporary use, not life-long, generation-to-generation use.
correct. who said it was for life? I would never support such ridiculous thing.
 
well it's certainly not because of social welfare programs.


correct. who said it was for life? I would never support such ridiculous thing.
I never said that you did. Just making it a clear point. :)
 
Not again!!! Unless you can back up your statement, you have committed slander which is against the AD rules. Your post has been reported.

AD can not allow itself to be an instrument to commit slander neither by posting a slanderous statement about a member nor a non-member.

Please refrain from attacking members and respect members, no matters if you agree or disagree.

I don't see Jiro break any forum rules and his post is perfectly fit. Please don't abuse the report system.

I think you may need trip to Hawaii and have a relax. :aw:
honolulu-airport-address.jpg
 
I never said that you did. Just making it a clear point. :)

no no. I'm just asking who would think anybody in social welfare program is in it for life? I hope most people know it is only for temporary use meant to help you to get started.
 
Yes, but the reference was to why there are more single mom's in American society today, compared to the past.

Meaning social services help is for temporary use, not life-long, generation-to-generation use.

That's correct about they are temporary and I will get out of welfare system when I complete the bachelor degree in around 2 years and ability to get job that meet my accommodation needs.

However, I don't have food stamp, Medicaid, public housing, SSI, etc except for disability pension, that it.
 
no no. I'm just asking who would think anybody in social welfare program is in it for life? I hope most people know it is only for temporary use meant to help you to get started.
Yet, there are people on welfare all their lives, and their children and grandchildren also.
 
Yet, there are people on welfare all their lives, and their children and grandchildren also.

Is it majority?

Some Americans with serious disabilities (not deafness) are on welfare for rest of their life, especially if they are not conditionally to be capable to working.
 
Yet, there are people on welfare all their lives, and their children and grandchildren also.

probably very poor. or farmers. I wonder how many are on it for life (excluding disability).
 
probably very poor. or farmers. I wonder how many are on it for life (excluding disability).

or workers with low wage because they are qualify for some welfare programs like Medicaid and food stamp.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top