R
rockdrummer
Guest
I found this quote fromt he article quite interesting and wonder if there are any current studies that address the questions below.
As children get older, social relationships become more important (Steinberg, 1999). Deaf children and adolescents whose ability to interact with hearing peers is compromised may become increasingly frustrated. Previous research with prelingually deaf adults found that many of those who grew up orally were frustrated with oral communication (Bat-Chava, 2000; Foster, 1988). In adolescence or early adulthood, some of them learned sign language and became part of the signing deaf community (Bat-Chava, 2000). Many of these people perceived their parents’ insistence on oral communication as harmful to their social relationships and identity development.
It is impossible to know what would have happened to people who were educated in the oral tradition if cochlear implants had been available to them.Would they have found oral communication less frustrating and would not have sought out other deaf people and sign language? Or would they have stopped using their implants, just as the children in Rose et al.’s and Holden- Pitt’s studies did? Until children who are implanted early become old enough to make their own judgment about the implant and tell us about it, we will not know how beneficial the implants are to them.
The old study that u first posted already proved what happens with deaf children when in all hearing environment. Why are further studies needed? That was my point.
I believe you are missing the point of my post. It's in the old study where they make the statements I bolded and my comment was concerning a newer study that addresses the points the old study made. See the part above bolded and in red. Hopefully that is clear.
Last edited by a moderator: