Still do not get what I'm saying, but oh well, I'm done. have fun, peace out
Just a quick note. At my class last night, they sign and voice. They had to turn off voices because I read lips. It was difficult. Try changing 36 years of habits!
Cuz u are all saying ASL only.
So, there is no such thing as an ASL only program..only as a foreign language requirement in high school and college where the classes are just taught with ASL only...meaning no English and no speech in those classes.
Maybe in the old days they had ASL only programs cuz the educators believed that deaf people werent capable of learning how to read and write nor develop speech.
In todays times, all programs that use ASL include English and speech classes.
No it is not same way as ASL and BSL and if it is same way and how come i can not able to understand ASL
I used to be BSL tutor for 11 years and yes no need to use
voice because it does help the students to learn by use their eyes instead of ears, because we deaf people only use their eyes to watch the sign langauge, And the students asked me does i use my voice I replied yes I does and while during on the course am not allow to use the voice and it very important because deaf people can not hear when hearing people speak like eg: when hearing person say 50 and deaf person not sure they mean it is 15 or 50 because it look similar so it very important for student to understand that it does look similar like 15/50. 14/40. So you try then you will understand what i does mean.
To be honest there are nothing much similar between ASL and BSL.
Yet I do use my voice with signs only for some reason lol when am angry or piss off
Originally Posted by Liebling))
No, there're difference between ASL and BSL. Don't forget that I born and raised in England. Many Europeans know American way of use sign language only without speaking.
BSL - sign language with speak (still speaking with or without voice).
ASL - sign language without speak (no even speaking).
I withnessed several Americans in real life here in Germany. They use ASL without speaking, just sign language without lip movement. It's hard for me to watch their just signing. I visited USA last July 2007 and met ADers in real life and told them that their way of sign language with speaking (I am not interesting either they use voice or not) is the same as many European countries. We understood each other prefect only when they speak on the same time as signing. ADers, I met in real life give me right that some American's way for use sign language without speaking. They do sometimes but with me, they signing with speak and also other ADers as well.
I realize that there are differences in BSL and ASL. However, both are forms of sign language, complete in and of themselves, and not manual representations of English. In the link I provided, the gentleman in the video is signing without voice, therefore without speaking, in the same way that an American signer would sign ASL without voice. You and Cheri kept saying that BSL was always sign + speech, unless I misunderstood your posts, so I was simply offering an example of BSL sithout voice.
jillio's post
The signs may be different just as the signs in SLL, NSL, FLS, ASL, BSL, and any other signed language or spoken language will differ. However, the fact that they are pure languages and not interpretations of the spoken language of that country makes them the same in their method of communication. I did not mean that all the signs in ASL and BSL are the same. What I meant was, they are both complete languages and not interpretations of the spoken language, and therefore, are signed without voice when they are used in their pure forms. And you have confirmed my point. They are signed without voice. Cheri and Leibling were saying that BSL is always signed with voice....sign and speech together.
We understand what you are saying Cheri, but English and ASL are two separate languages. That is why they are not used together. To use them together, the teacher would have to speak in ASL syntax, which is not a proper model of English and not useful when teaching English grammar and syntax, or sign in English syntax, which is not a proper model of ASL, and is useless in teaching ASL syntax and grammar.
You have realized no deaf is the same as another deaf.
From my experience, I uses my voice whenever I sign at all times even in SEE, and even ASL.
Example: in ASL I would sign and voice "I go store" it's up to another deaf person if she/he wishes to watch my mouth and signs the same time, even interpreters in my experience mouth the words too while they're signing.
We KNOW they are TWO different languages we are not bunch of retard deaf people, Tousi.
In the educational setting where complex concepts are taught in all subjects, it is critical to keep both languages separate so the kids can focus on learning the different concepts rather than trying to make sense of two languages being mixed together.
I beleive that deaf and hearing teacher should speak with accurate lip movement which help deaf students to read anyone's lip easier.
I was confused in some posts that deaf teacher must sign deaf students without voice because it should not confuse deaf children if deaf teacher use voice when she/he signing? It make no sense to me because deaf students can't hear either deaf teacher signing with voice or not but watch teacher's signing and lip movement with their own eyes. ?
*chuckling*
Well, there's the challenge for you.
Besides, you'll get the hang of it eventually.
Never too late to learn sign language. Mum learned sign language in her 40's and even now deaf people can understand her.
But she find it difficult to read back if you don't use sim-com.
I know how you feel CutePommie,
Correct...
Yes, that's right Deaf tutors should use without voice when they educated hearing students because they should watch their sign language with lip movement with their own eyes instead of ears. It does the same here in Germany as well
....but I can't understand that someone stated in their previous posts that deaf teacher should sign deaf students without voice because it would confused them if they sign with voice which is not sense to me because deaf children can't hear...
My opinion is up to deaf students either they sign and speak/lip movement with or without voice.
What do you think of this?
I never said that BSL is always signed with voice or speech... See red bold...BSL: sign language with speak (still speaking with or without voice) which mean is sign language to match accurate speaking like lipreading which is easier for the people to read our lips.
See my explanation over the difference form of lip movement between ASL and BSL in my post.
http://www.alldeaf.com/903104-post325.html
CutePommie confirmed my point, not your point.
Yes, we all know that we use sign languages with facial expression and body movement same but we tried to convince over BSL speaking with lip movement which is total different as ASL.
Can you tell me what sim-com is?
I have to practice tonight.
ASL itself is no relation to English, ASL shares more with spoken Japanese than it does with English
I don't see the differences if they sign ASL and use their voice with the signs because both ways is the same. What do they rather do? Sign ASL and mute the words? What if a deaf child don't understand a sign or two. Too bad for them?
ASL itself is no relation to English, ASL shares more with spoken Japanese than it does with English
I don't see the differences if they sign ASL and use their voice with the signs because both ways is the same. What do they rather do? Sign ASL and mute the words? What if a deaf child don't understand a sign or two. Too bad for them?
ASL itself is no relation to English, ASL shares more with spoken Japanese than it does with English
I don't see the differences if they sign ASL and use their voice with the signs because both ways is the same. What do they rather do? Sign ASL and mute the words? What if a deaf child don't understand a sign or two. Too bad for them?