BradB08
New Member
- Joined
- Aug 4, 2008
- Messages
- 2,699
- Reaction score
- 4
are you implying that McCain is going to be another Bush Administration with incompetent people?
I haven't seen anything that proves the opposite.
are you implying that McCain is going to be another Bush Administration with incompetent people?
I haven't seen anything that proves the opposite.
and I haven't seen anything that proves it either
Want to borrow my glasses?
i like mine
Are they rose-colored?
you have a funny way of calling your posts as POV and other ADers' negative posts as insulting
And he has to have the innate intelligence to know when he is making a good choice, and hiring the proper advisors...something sadly lacking in our current adminsitration.
Yes, that´s right.
Jiro123´s post make no sense to me. At first, he said that he want to see president´s political background experience and now he changed his mind... *scratch my head*
Originally Posted by jiro123
working with Americans and living in America is different - especially when one is paying tax and voting the people to offices. completely different.
I am asking you this simple question: MUST I ANSWER YOUR QUESTIONS WHICH ARE CLEARLY BIASED AND VERY SUGGESTIVE? I have every right to decline to answer your questions since they are biased and very suggestive.
Where are your proof that I support McCain? In this Presidental campaign, I am neutral. I have made points to counter your misguided and/or baseless arguments.
I did not insult your intelligence because you got a wrong fact about the Republicans. I again make a point that there are many rich people like Warren Buffett, George Soros, Steven Spielberg and many others that have supported the Democratic Party for a long time, too. At that time it was a fact, not POV that you used.
Why do I have to repeat this to you? Go back and re-read my response post #440 to Reba.
The bottom line is people from all walks of life simply choose to support either the Republican or Democratic Party based on their ideology, beliefs and issues which are favorable to them.
Of course I know that many wealthy supported Democratic. I already explained at my response post #440.
You cleverly tried to twist my words about Obama's background; therefore, you showed no respect to me.
Many people are already aware of the "other side" and disagree with it. I don't see anything wrong with it.
hhmmm... nope
[/color][/font]
maybe it's because about 20% of wealthy people is responsible for 80% of USA's wealth. they deserve a tax break now and then.
I want to make sure first before I say something.
Are you saying that you are for McCain´s tax plan for wealth?
Would you agree that McCain´s tax plan for low and middle class okay?
if obama said he doesn't care about oil and is not interested in protecting USA's oil interest, then he is a liar.
I thought you know Obama´s energy plan, don´t you?
oh well. that's the thing about democrats. they like to pay more than they have. it puzzles me how they can afford medicare they preach about.
*speechless*
I..... see.... so you choose to look at one side.
I see why not to choose one side, not both side because you choose McCain´s side in first place. If you choose both sides then I would do the same.
Nope, some of you choose to disrespect Brad´s thread when he ask for Obama´s supporters to post here and share view over Obama. Some of you use McCain´s name up to mess Brad´s thread to negative Obama´s image in first place.
I support Hillary for long years and accept the fact that she lost her election and focus on both sides between McCain and Obama and then decide for Obama.
They get tax cut so that rich people can pay more to stimulate the economy. get it? Not just for their own personal wealth. If you keep paying tax, then there's no incentive to put money into economy growth.
Sorry, I has to disagree with you on this.
It would hurt economy if they increase tax on low and middle class people, not wealthy...
It also hurt economy, too if they keep on spend on war issues than take care of people and country.
Millions people cannot afford to pay loan, buy US products, house mortages, etc... to boost economy. Many Americans choose to buy products from China over US because they are cheap.
I prefer to see them to increase tax on rich people to help low and middle class people´s life easier.
Remember Clinton´s economy, he increased tax on wealth people and create million jobs and tax break for low and middle class people...? None of businesses go down because of this...? Bush?
Oh wait... McCain do not support Education on low and middle class people...???
I don't mind paying my tax for social program to help unfortunate people but... I'm sorry. I have my own different priority. I'd like a major portion of my tax money to be spent on economy and other important things because in my opinion - that can help create more jobs, more incentives... and there would be less unemployment rate and more people can spend spend spend. Democrats are known for their infamous high taxes - something I don't like.
Yes, it´s your opinoin as different as my opinion. I rather to pay more tax to support people and country, to help education, create more jobs, unemployment rates, etc. It would end :topic: if I say something here but I posted my POV at several debate threads last year.
and... I have never heard of "many wealthy people" preferring to pay more tax to help people... that's NEW to me.
I´m not a clairvoyant. I can´t count how many wealthy people... but I use in neutral way is: many wealthy people prefer to pay more tax to help people and country over war issues and many wealthy people support republicians because of tax instead of all, few or some.
Yeah, I notice it, too because I want to know his reason why he agree with McCain´s economy. I need his help to convince me why.... Oh well...
I respect Pacman´s choice and wish him good luck.
well why don't I rephrase it - instead of expert... how about the in-depth actual experience? Your experience is limited to reading and conversing about it... which is why your posts/POV do not work well for American system. You cannot apply your European solution/suggestion to American system.
America = Democratic
Europe = Socialism
won't work well.
Obama can talk all he wants. Why believe his hot bulletpoints when he haven't done it to even his own state?
Why do I have to repeat this to you? Go back and re-read my response post #440 to Reba.
Of course I know that many wealthy supported Democratic. I already explained at my response post #440.
Then you should not said it in first place. That is why I absolutely agree with Reba about your original post which was clearly stereotypical.
*rub my eyes* Do I understand your post correct that you said that my 2 simple questions is disrespectful? *rub my eyes and re-read your post *
I only see that you accused me to twist your words... I ASKED you 2 *S I M P L E* questions BECAUSE you correct someone´s negative post over Obama´s background. I am not here to accuse or insult you negative but ASKED you TWO SIMPLE QUESTIONS... Don´t you understand what "questions" mean?
Ignore or tell me that you do not obligate to answer my both questions... Is it hard?