New bill would make ESRB ratings legally binding

Foxrac said:
I'm very interesting to see court cases about third party purchases of games.

If you find it, so just share with us.
Click to expand...

I have no intention of looking.
 
Foxrac said:
What is any benefits to have legal ramification?
Click to expand...

to hold them responsible for it.

it's illegal to sell age-inappropriate movie tickets, porno, alcohols, and cigarettes to minors. why not age-inappropriate games too?
 
Foxrac said:
I think you are misunderstood - the congressman from Utah is proposing the federal law, not state law. It hasn't passed yet.



It is bringing into committee to discuss, so it hasn't passed yet.

Those proposing law is federal, not state of Utah.
Click to expand...

:ty: for correction.

I'm not sure how I missed that. I probably got confused with it when reading about other articles unrelated to this subject. :dunno:

this proposed law has my full support.
 
Foxrac said:
so it doesn't change my view on sale of games.
Click to expand...

I haven't even expressed my opinion on the sale of games, nor have I tried to change yours. I merely pointed out that providing minors with games that they could not otherwise legally obtain would be a crime. That is a fact.
 
Jiro said:
:ty: for correction.

I'm not sure how I missed that. I probably got confused with it when reading about other articles unrelated to this subject. :dunno:

this proposed law has my full support.
Click to expand...

Mine too, although I would prefer that it be done at the state level.
 
Jiro said:
there's absolutely nothing unconstitutional about it. I believe this falls under Commerce Clause. all perfectly legal.
Click to expand...

Yup, even guns (which are specifically provided for in the constitution) have age restrictions for purchase.
 
TXgolfer said:
I haven't even expressed my opinion on the sale of games, nor have I tried to change yours. I merely pointed out that providing minors with games that they could not otherwise legally obtain would be a crime. That is a fact.
Click to expand...

You did changed my view on federal income tax and found out that your argument is valid.

I cannot validate your argument about third party purchases on games and I don't see as fact, unless you have to present the court cases.

However, Jiro said lack of legal ramification for games that cause non-existant on court cases over games.
 
Foxrac said:
You did changed my view on federal income tax and found out that your argument is valid.

I cannot validate your argument about third party purchases on games and I don't see as fact, unless you have to present the court cases.

However, Jiro said lack of legal ramification for games that cause non-existant on court cases over games.
Click to expand...

I said the same in the first part of post 16. Note the "if".....it is very important in that sentence.
 
Jiro said:
to hold them responsible for it.

it's illegal to sell age-inappropriate movie tickets, porno, alcohols, and cigarettes to minors. why not age-inappropriate games too?
Click to expand...

Do you have any problem with games?

Jiro said:
:ty: for correction.

I'm not sure how I missed that. I probably got confused with it when reading about other articles unrelated to this subject. :dunno:

this proposed law has my full support.
Click to expand...

No problem about correction.

I'm not support legal ramification until I find enough benefits on between game and behavior.

I played violent game since I was little kid, so it didn't change my behavior.

Jiro said:
there's absolutely nothing unconstitutional about it. I believe this falls under Commerce Clause. all perfectly legal.
Click to expand...

Oh well, I just wait and see.

Many legislations tried to introduce the bills about video games for years, so none of them have passed, except for California's case got struck down.
 
TXgolfer said:
I said the same in the first part of post 16. Note the "if".....it is very important in that sentence.
Click to expand...

I hate to tell you - it didn't prove about third party purchases on games.

I rather to have agree to disagree on those issues.
 
If I don't agree with your statement, even if you think it is fact, so it is best to agree to disagree and move on.

I'm not going to continue to argue about legality of third party purchases on games. I don't believe that your statement is fact, so let my view stands.
 
From the link...

Any action by an adult that allows or encourages illegal behavior by a person under the age of 18, or that places children in situations that expose them to illegal behavior. Contributing to the delinquency of a minor can be as simple as keeping a child home from school and thus, making the child a truant. It also can manifest itself in more serious behavior. For example, an adult who commits a crime in the presence of a child can be charged with contributing to the delinquency of a minor, as can an adult who serves alcoholic beverages to anyone under the legal drinking age. Still more egregious is sexual exploitation, which could include having sexual relations with minors or engaging in the production or trafficking of Child Pornography.
Click to expand...

from my post...

If you read the links, the law is very broad.....of course it would cover games if selling games to minors became illegal. Note the word "any"
Click to expand...

Hope that helps.
 
Foxrac said:
If I don't agree with your statement, even if you think it is fact, so it is best to agree to disagree and move on.

I'm not going to continue to argue about legality of third party purchases on games. I don't believe that your statement is fact, so let my view stands.
Click to expand...

See post 36.... It is not that we are disagreeing. You are not understanding what is being said.

This is not disagreeing or quibbling or even debating....we are trying to help you understand what was said.
 
Back
Top