C.C.Sinned
New Member
- Joined
- Feb 16, 2005
- Messages
- 4,438
- Reaction score
- 1
that is good cuz your hands would get tangled on my hairy tushNah, that's not my style. I cant afford to get arrested and cant afford a settlement.
that is good cuz your hands would get tangled on my hairy tushNah, that's not my style. I cant afford to get arrested and cant afford a settlement.
Maybe this boy wanted to take a long look....
that is good cuz your hands would get tangled on my hairy tush
My friend who grew up in Puerto Rico slept with different adults as a child. When she moved here, she was shocked by the views against it.
And my Dad just let me?and jackson just let him?
Shame on u for putting a emoticion of a pedophile in this thread!
and jackson just let him?
Rather it's about MJ's history and his odd fascination with children, mostly boys, and then you have sleepover nights with children. MJ even admitted that. Later on in his life red flags began popping up with his slow and gradual self-destruction and ever increasinly erractic and eccentrinc personality. But, or course, he was a musical genius in his early days before he succumbed to Hollyweird and that’s what I’ll choose to remember. So sad — the corruption of innocence, the talent squandered, the celebrity gone wild. All the trappings of being a star.
Again, to those who claim Michael Jackson was exonerated of the crime of sexual molestation of a minor, I would ask a simple question; would you allow your teen or pre teen son to spend a night at Jackson's home unchaperoned?
Jillio?
I thought so.
Yeah, just don't say anything. A non-answer will suffice and explains lots, including apparent hypocrisy.
Michael Jackson, world famous pedophile, dead at 50.
Food for thought:
Is Michael Jackson a Pedophile? - Jim Kouri - MensNewsDaily.com™
nope. you are inferring and implying.I'm not deflecting at all. I am stating quite clearly what I mean to state. You are the one that keeps inferring meaning. Very interesting.
more implicationHow could you possibly know that? Are you projecting again?
nope. you are inferring and implying.
kinda funny you don't come right out and say it
more implication
C'mon guys.. I mean come on.
We are debating about peters in a topic on the king of pop dying..!
Imagine being at his funeral while some of the people are sad for the loss of Jackson.
Then some people in the back are discussing about what happened between Jordan Chandler and him and whether it was debatable or not.
That's how I see it going around here .
I thought they're only supposed to pay their respects and memories of someone who passed away.
I can't imagine it happening at my own funeral.
C'mon guys.. I mean come on.
We are debating about peters in a topic on the king of pop dying..!
Imagine being at his funeral while some of the people are sad for the loss of Jackson.
Then some people in the back are discussing about what happened between Jordan Chandler and him and whether it was debatable or not.
That's how I see it going around here .
I thought they're only supposed to pay their respects and memories of someone who passed away.
I can't imagine it happening at my own funeral.
Not inferring or implying anything. I am, however, stating right up front that I see a lot of fascination and obsession over pedophilia, and projection of circumstances that cannot possibly be known onto another, as well as extreme defensiveness where it is not needed. Take it for what you will.
with a hidden meaningNope. A simple statement.
Maybe my purse will...