Yep, I read it. And you are wrong again. It says it right there in the paragraph where it discusses the difference between SEE I and SEE II.
I am still looking for the answer to my question regarding the name of one school that uses SEE I or SEE II as the language of instruction. You claim there are many. Surely out of that "many" you can name just one.
Since you can't seem to find it, here you go:
In SEE1, all compound words are formed as separate signs - instead of using the ASL sign for butterfly, SEE1 places the signs for but, er, and fly in sequential order. SEE1 also uses the same sign for all homonyms - the same sign is used to sign blue and blew.
SEE2 was developed by Gerilee Gustason, Esther Zawolkow, and Donna Pfetzing in the early 1970s. As an offshoot of SEE1, many features of SEE2 are identical to that code system. Initializations and grammatical markers are also used in SEE2, but compound words with an equivalent ASL sign are used as the ASL sign, as with butterfly. SEE2 is also used in Singapore. About 75% to 80% of SEE2 signs are either borrowed from ASL or are modified ASL signs. Signing Exact English uses more markers as opposed to Signed English, which uses 14 markers.
As there is no more formal use of SEE1, Signing Exact English is no longer referred to as SEE2, but rather SEE.
So, how about those schools using SEE as their language of instruction, since it is not used formally any longer?