Grummer
Active Member
- Joined
- Jun 30, 2006
- Messages
- 14,707
- Reaction score
- 18
for those who are deafened or acquire deafness it IS a disability, and has nothing to do with 'feeling', you just are disabled by it. Disability is defined in those terms as 'suffering sensory deprivation/loss after having hearing.' To write it off via culture is meaningless. Also coping with loss has nothing to do with zeroing it as a disability. Once you entertain THAT idea, then culture loses meaning too. Born deaf or those who from pre-school years had NO useful hearing cannot enter the debate. Ergo, they don't miss what they never had so it is a norm for THEM, for the rest it isn't, thus, a disablement.
It can be argued the considerable need for specialist education, interpreters, and disability welfare payments also recognise, even if 'Deaf' do not, they are disabled. They are relying on others for communication help. Empowerment is only true as is independent if you are NOT reliant on anyone else. I think basically 'Deaf' reject disability because of pride mostly. I don't think it really valid in practical terms, and certainly see no negativity in a disability label, without it few deaf in the western world would get any help.
Pride is a political hype that got misused, by both sides of the protest, its like drug, if can help pain but it can also create defiant behaviour...
Pride has been a double blade weapon, little did Deaf people know it was also going to go against themselves, by a political misdirection to overlook how organisations disables (d/Deaf) people...
So, you saying a disablement is distinct from disability?
Disability IS about how specialist education, interpreters, and welfare are imposed with a condition, which has an effect of control...this control is thus disablement. You better look at the Union of the Physically Impaired Against Segregation. Fundamental Principles of Disability, London, 1976 as quoted in What is a Disability? outlined this distinction between disability and impairment, and going by your use of 'disablement' to describe those born deaf...is fundamentally erroneous. as below have put the demarcation set in correct position angle of what is disabilty..
Definitions of disability reflect society’s view of disability and of people with impairments. Recently, definitions have been developed by disabled people to explain the disabling effects of society and the way it is organised on the lives of people with impairments. Consideration of these definitions led to the development of models of disability
In your bolded part is indeed debatable as well, it is wrong to say those are Culturally Deaf have no say in what is Disability! That is a political denial.