- Joined
- Jan 2, 2008
- Messages
- 3,418
- Reaction score
- 7
No, I'm asking a simple question to CSign which is why is she advocating a method that is seemingly opposed by the majority of the Deaf here on AD.
I'm curious about this response. Shel90 has mentioned that she uses SEE for the purposes described in the study (to teach deaf children literacy), Jillio has referred to it as an effective tool for that purpose, as have others. Why is Csign's post bringing this recent study up for discussion considered flouting the "Deaf" view? From what I've seen and read, the majority of Deaf and deaf-respected educators feel that SEE IS an effective tool when used in this way. The opposition is to the use of SEE as a primary language.