jillio
New Member
- Joined
- Jun 14, 2006
- Messages
- 60,232
- Reaction score
- 19
Do not disagree with you and I know many adults who did so but of those adults who subsequently got a ci later in life they universally wish that it had been available to them when they were children. I also know that for my daughter, a profoundly deaf child who did not benefit from HAs, it would have been a struggle for her to learn to speak without a cochlear implant and the fact that with it her language development literally exploded tells us something also.
I guess what I do not understand is the philosophy that suggests that she, or any child, should be made to struggle? Why? Where is the logic, and as some would suggest, the compassion or empathy, in saying that it is permissible for a child to use HAs that do not help the child at all and for the child to struggle to learn to speak and to hear but it is not permissible for the child to use a cochelar implant which, for our daughter did allow her to speak and to hear? As parents we chose to possibly eliminate or to alleviate that struggle. We were not made any guaranties as to what the ci would do for our child and we both had done our research to know that there were no such guaranties. I guess in the end, we just have a different philosophy as to how to raise a child. Not better or worse, just different.
Rick
Why must a child be made to struggle to speak and/or hear at all?