- Joined
- Nov 21, 2013
- Messages
- 12,688
- Reaction score
- 1
It was a joke. Of course not.
Hmm. Still need more work.
It was a joke. Of course not.
Bad idea. Hearing voices and hallucinating in front of 95,000 people doing that and wanting to become friends? I wouldn't suggest it.
You don't want to be friends with people who have mental/psychiatric disorders that cause them to express themselves inappropriately?
Dude, it's not all about YOU. :roll:Okay, good. It'd better not end up there without my consent, because I was the one who started the thread, and I would prefer it stay here.
Many of us have real lives that mean we can't jump on-line immediately to post breaking news. That doesn't mean we aren't aware of what's happening.Nah. I'm okay. I don't expect thanks. I knew it would come out eventually, and truth be told I didn't even know if someone else had already done so or not, but when I posted it and checked, I was surprised to be the first one, despite the fact it had been shown the night before I posted it.
Prepared? For what? :Ohno:Oh, okay. CrazyPaul was just telling me that anything is possible so I'd better be prepared.
Many of us have real lives that mean we can't jump on-line immediately to post breaking news. That doesn't mean we aren't aware of what's happening.
Many of us have real lives that mean we can't jump on-line immediately to post breaking news. That doesn't mean we aren't aware of what's happening.
What I was getting at was your focus.
If I interact with a disabled person who treats me rudely, and I want to make a disparaging comment about them, I comment about their rudeness, not their disablity.
If someone from a particular ethnic group commits a crime, and I want to gripe about it, I gripe about the crime, not the ethnicity.
If I were myself disabled or from an ehtnic group with a history of drawing derision, (or whatever the non-condemnable aspect of the person behaving condemnably) I would expect even more ability/motivation on my part as far as distinguishing between the two.
I don't discriminate. I'm quite open-minded, yet focused on what I'm saying, because I try to focus on the subject itself and not the person. If a person were rude to me here, I wouldn't just comment right off the bat; I'd carefully figure out how to word it, so as not to rile too many people. I AM motivated, and how I motivate myself is quite unusual-- you see, someone once told me to expect the unexpected, and that's allowed me to quickly adjust my schedule at moment's notice, and keep moving. I am constantly on my feet, and I do try to plan ahead of time, but sometimes the unexpected happens, and I have to adapt, and quickly, and I've gotten quite good at it.
A South African deputy Cabinet minister says "a mistake happened" in the hiring of a sign language interpreter for the Nelson Mandela memorial service who experts say was signing gibberish on stage next to world leaders.
The Deputy Minister of Women, Children and People with Disabilities (Hendrietta Bogopane-Zulu) said Thursday that government officials have tried to track down the company that provided Thamsanqa Jantjie (tam-SAHNG-kah shawn-TEE-leh) but that they "have vanished into thin air."
The deputy minister apologized to deaf people offended around the world by what they say was the interpreter's incomprehensible signing.
She says an investigation is under way to determine how the interpreter received a security clearance.
Jantjie stood gesticulating three-feet from U.S. President Barack Obama and others who spoke at the ceremony that was broadcast around the world. He tells The Associated Press he had visions of angels coming into the stadium and was trying not to panic because he was surrounded by armed policemen.
Jantjie insists he was doing proper sign-language interpretation of the speeches, but also apologized for his performance.
SAfrica: 'Mistake' made hiring Mandela interpreter - WTOP.com
Was he signing gibberish then too? I don't know SASL
if so ... then his schizophrenia defense gets blown out of the water no?
Now that's not cool. Who wants to start a petition to make 'em realize we don't like that?
Once you create a thread, it becomes public as AD is a public forum. With the Internet, info goes viral FAST.
I doubt any of those famous people would care much, except for the fact that the guy breached security and made himself an international scapegoat. As for me, I'm happy being me. However, I'm pretty sure AD people are thankful I brought this to their attention. At the very least, I discovered something worth posting for once.