Ex. Prez Carter Says Racism Factor In Opposition To Obama.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Eggshells? More like dealing with a bunch of crybabies and those pretending to be above the fray but constantly complain about being criticized and imply it has to do with their skin color. It is plainly obvious that those at the top are using race as their shield against any criticisms when all other arguments fail.

Anybody remember this one?
Patterico’s Pontifications Obama Says Republicans Will Run Racist Campaign Against Him

And the constant reminder from the MSM who keep bringing up the race card over and over and over and over and over again....ad nauseum. Obama can pretend but he certainly shows his statist side yet he let his minions do that for him and complain about race. Maybe he has racist tendency as well? If they want to play that game, why not the others?
 
sorry...tried editing to delete unitended second copy. Only finding edit change options and no delete.
the edit button shows edit/delete on the pulldown but then no delete option.
 
Crybabies????? hahahaha
And what do you call all these teabagger types whining scared poopless about change?
Above the fray???? And what do you call someone like you who constantly talks to himself....debates with himself......leaving out infos and creating one-sided views?
I call that putting oneself above the fray.
You talk as though everyone is dumb and can't see thru you bias. And as though your answers are above the fray.
Insulting.
Join the conversation in a realistic manner....or you are only talking with yourself. Above the fray.


Eggshells? More like dealing with a bunch of crybabies and those pretending to be above the fray but constantly complain about being criticized and imply it has to do with their skin color. It is plainly obvious that those at the top are using race as their shield against any criticisms when all other arguments fail.

Anybody remember this one?
Patterico’s Pontifications Obama Says Republicans Will Run Racist Campaign Against Him

And the constant reminder from the MSM who keep bringing up the race card over and over and over and over and over again....ad nauseum. Obama can pretend but he certainly shows his statist side yet he let his minions do that for him and complain about race. Maybe he has racist tendency as well? If they want to play that game, why not the others?
 
Well, that's because SOME people don't believe that Obama was born in Hawaii. Some people think that his birth certificate could be a fake. It's possible that Obama paid the hospital to use a fake birth certificate to protect his identity/birthplace.


If the people doubt Obama´s birth certificate then check with Factcheck.org, snope.com or Politifact. Why can´t they?

Is it true that he is an actually American ?

Yes he is an American.


If, yes then why did he screw our country ? He screwed economy, health care, GMC, banks, mortages (houses), and everything. People complaint about him.

Blame Bush Admin., not Obama.

Bush Admin. ignored financial crisis warnings (including Economy) in begin year of 2006.


More and more protesters are against him, because they don't believe him that he will make our country improve and better.

Simple is: Protesters are sooooo stupid and ignorants to think Obama should do everything for 8 months! It´s impossible!!!

Obama is in the office for 8 months and clean Bush´s huge mess.


More people die due to no health insurance, because of him changin' health care. People can't afford. Obama should leave people's health care alone as it was before he became President... why screw now ??

I´m sorry that you was being misinformed over Obama and healthcare Reform.

First of all, Obama told everyone during Election 2008 about Healthcare and remember everyone about the people died due lack of healthcare everyday. They voted him because they want his plan for healthcare.

Now? That protestors were being brainwashed by lies over Obama. Yes, it´s very sad that the protestors have very little education over healthcare issues.
 
If the people doubt Obama´s birth certificate then check with Factcheck.org, snope.com or Politifact. Why can´t they?



Yes he is an American.




Blame Bush Admin., not Obama.

Bush Admin. ignored financial crisis warnings (including Economy) in begin year of 2006.




Simple is: Protesters are sooooo stupid and ignorants to think Obama should do everything for 8 months! It´s impossible!!!

Obama is in the office for 8 months and clean Bush´s huge mess.




I´m sorry that you was being misinformed over Obama and healthcare Reform.

First of all, Obama told everyone during Election 2008 about Healthcare and remember everyone about the people died due lack of healthcare everyday. They voted him because they want his plan for healthcare.

Now? That protestors were being brainwashed by lies over Obama. Yes, it´s very sad that the protestors have very little education over healthcare issues.

Good posting, Liebling. I agree with almost everything you said. And don't forget that Social Security and Medicare had a SURPLUS at the beginning of Bush'es term in 2000, and one of the first things he did was raid those funds for his spending program. Eh bien.
 
Crybabies????? hahahaha
And what do you call all these teabagger types whining scared poopless about change?
Above the fray???? And what do you call someone like you who constantly talks to himself....debates with himself......leaving out infos and creating one-sided views?
I call that putting oneself above the fray.
You talk as though everyone is dumb and can't see thru you bias. And as though your answers are above the fray.
Insulting.
Join the conversation in a realistic manner....or you are only talking with yourself. Above the fray.

I guess you didn't see the video of anchor Chris Wallace who talked about the WH admin and how he had to deal with "bunch of crybabies," something he's never seen in his 30 years of journalism business. No professional decorum is what he was getting at and examples of that attitude start from the top down. That was my thinking.

Everybody has bias. No big mystery there.

Concentrate on making the arguments and not personal, ad homenim attacks. This isn't about me. This is about the topic at hand.
 
I guess you didn't see the video of anchor Chris Wallace who talked about the WH admin and how he had to deal with "bunch of crybabies," something he's never seen in his 30 years of journalism business. No professional decorum is what he was getting at and examples of that attitude start from the top down. That was my thinking.

Everybody has bias. No big mystery there.

Concentrate on making the arguments and not personal, ad homenim attacks. This isn't about me. This is about the topic at hand.

Chris Wallace? You mean that guy with a stupid grin who thought he's clever enough to make a big fame in trying to shame Bill Clinton on 9/11? LOLLLLLLL he got spanked by Clinton big time!!!!!! I can tell he shat in his pants while fake-smiling when Clinton wagged that big Presidential finger of his!

:laugh2::laugh2::laugh2:
 
Well, they're the ones making the racist charges and being crybabies. Clinton got challenged knowing he didn't do much other than send a couple of missiles at Osama's tent to show that he's "serious." It was Clinton who got owned and his finger wagging deal didn't help him much either.
 
Chris Wallace? You mean that guy with a stupid grin who thought he's clever enough to make a big fame in trying to shame Bill Clinton on 9/11? LOLLLLLLL he got spanked by Clinton big time!!!!!! I can tell he shat in his pants while fake-smiling when Clinton wagged that big Presidential finger of his!

:laugh2::laugh2::laugh2:

Right!:laugh2:
 
Well, they're the ones making the racist charges and being crybabies. Clinton got challenged knowing he didn't do much other than send a couple of missiles at Osama's tent to show that he's "serious." It was Clinton who got owned and his finger wagging deal didn't help him much either.

What the hell does bombing Iraq got to do with 9/11?

Addendum: Nevermind... The Kenyan attack. Yeah... bombing Afghanistan... look at where we are 8 years after the fact, still going nowhere.
 
Well, they're the ones making the racist charges and being crybabies. Clinton got challenged knowing he didn't do much other than send a couple of missiles at Osama's tent to show that he's "serious." It was Clinton who got owned and his finger wagging deal didn't help him much either.

hmm..... perhaps you need to watch the interview again. It is Chris who got owned big time..... because he did not do his homework carefully when interviewing Clinton.... like reading Richard Clarke's testimony and book.....

Did you see how quickly Wallace wanted to try to change subject by talking about Clinton Global Initiative? :lol:

we all know what Chris Wallace's ulterior motive is.... and it's to get Bill Clinton to admit that he was incompetent and he messed up big time especially with 9/11 - something to make Bush & RNC look good.

:nono: TRY AGAIN! WALLACE! :nono:
 
Kind of funny because if you watch that YouTube interview of Bill who went ballistic where he blurted out a few loose nuggets that he attempted to authorized the CIA to assassinate him and even contracted with other parties to kill him.

Personally, that'd be the best way to do it rather than send a whole army after him. But the nutroots would be up in arms over that one, too.

Even Wallace tried to offer to change the conversation to his philanthropic efforts. But no, the former president, seeing that his own ego attacked, wanted to continue talking about terrorism and to further diminish any criticisms that his administration was weak on terror.

Here's the transcript:
FOXNews.com - Transcript: William Jefferson Clinton on 'FOX News Sunday' - FOX News Sunday | Chris Wallace

Clearly he was upset. But clearly he couldn't handle a simple question without seeing his own ego bruised. Boo hoo...another example of a crybaby in office? Hmm....
FOXNews.com - Former President Bill Clinton Defends Handling of Usama bin Laden in Combative FNC Interview - Politics | Republican Party | Democratic Party | Political Spectrum
 
Yet another link from Faux News. Ain't gonna bother looking, lol.
 
hmm..... perhaps you need to watch the interview again. It is Chris who got owned big time..... because he did not do his homework carefully when interviewing Clinton.... like reading Richard Clarke's testimony and book.....

Did you see how quickly Wallace wanted to try to change subject by talking about Clinton Global Initiative? :lol:

we all know what Chris Wallace's ulterior motive is.... and it's to get Bill Clinton to admit that he was incompetent and he messed up big time especially with 9/11 - something to make Bush & RNC look good.

:nono: TRY AGAIN! WALLACE! :nono:

Ah, ah, ah.... :nono: :nono: Not so fast.

Wallace offered to change the subject because Bill was angry and he didn't want to change the topic...he kept talk only because his ego was damaged and bruised.

You have to expect hard questions if you're the sitting president. Not softball questions or get treated with kids glove. Of course, we see that in this administration by the MSM. Unless you want to count Stephanopoulos' recent interview with Obama about that his proposed fines are considered as taxes and he attempted to change the very definition of the word "tax".

Laughable.

Obama: Mandate is Not a Tax - George's Bottom Line
 
Former Italian President Francesco Cossiga maintains that 9-11 was run by the CIA and Mossad. I could post the video but it is not captioned, and besides, it would be off topic. Oh well. :)
 
Ah, ah, ah.... :nono: :nono: Not so fast.

Wallace offered to change the subject because Bill was angry and he didn't want to change the topic...he kept talk only because his ego was damaged and bruised.

You have to expect hard questions if you're the sitting president. Not softball questions or get treated with kids glove. Of course, we see that in this administration by the MSM. Unless you want to count Stephanopoulos' recent interview with Obama about that his proposed fines are considered as taxes and he attempted to change the very definition of the word "tax".

Laughable.

Obama: Mandate is Not a Tax - George's Bottom Line

ah.. as expected of you to spin it into your favor. :nono: Let me explain.... a complete truth. Chris Wallace's interview with Bill Clinton was supposed to be about Clinton Global Initiative and some minutes spared for anything else.

Link to Transcript
It began with introduction, some how-are-you-and-what's-up-with-you, etc... and then Wallace warmed up the conversation toward to what he wants to get some dirt on - the 9/11 subject.

Wallace began with
"When we announced that you were going to be on "Fox News Sunday," I got a lot of e-mail from viewers. And I've got to say, I was surprised. Most of them wanted me to ask you this question: Why didn't you do more to put bin Laden and Al Qaeda out of business when you were president?

There's a new book out, I suspect you've already read, called "The Looming Tower." And it talks about how the fact that when you pulled troops out of Somalia in 1993, bin Laden said, "I have seen the frailty and the weakness and the cowardice of U.S. troops." Then there was the bombing of the embassies in Africa and the attack on the Cole."
and then Wallace kept on asking - WHY WHY WHY WHY?

Here's Clinton's answer that basically OWNED him
CLINTON: What did I do? What did I do? I worked hard to try to kill him. I authorized a finding for the CIA to kill him. We contracted with people to kill him. I got closer to killing him than anybody has gotten since. And if I were still president, we'd have more than 20,000 troops there trying to kill him.

Now, I've never criticized President Bush, and I don't think this is useful. But you know we do have a government that thinks Afghanistan is only one-seventh as important as Iraq.

And you ask me about terror and Al Qaeda with that sort of dismissive thing? When all you have to do is read Richard Clarke's book to look at what we did in a comprehensive, systematic way to try to protect the country against terror.

And you've got that little smirk on your face and you think you're so clever. But I had responsibility for trying to protect this country. I tried and I failed to get bin Laden. I regret it. But I did try. And I did everything I thought I responsibly could.

The entire military was against sending Special Forces in to Afghanistan and refueling by helicopter. And no one thought we could do it otherwise, because we could not get the CIA and the FBI to certify that Al Qaeda was responsible while I was president.

And so, I left office. And yet, I get asked about this all the time. They had three times as much time to deal with it, and nobody ever asks them about it. I think that's strange.

Wallace should have stuck with Global Initiative topic and then use the remaining spare time on something else. This sleezy bastard thinks he can make a fame out of it :nono: In case you didn't know - Clinton is one of the famous and best orators and debaters. He's been doing it for decades since college (or high school). I'm sure he can handle any hardball questions you can throw at him but if you're gonna come up with a cheap-shot question like what Wallace did, you bet your ass that you will get a sucker punch in return especially from a seasoned debater. Wallace asked a question. He will get the answer in return... no matter if he doesn't like it or not but he cannot try to change subject if he didn't get the answer he wants in front of live tv with million viewers. :nono:

TRY AGAIN!
 
ah.. as expected of you to spin it into your favor. :nono: Let me explain.... a complete truth. Chris Wallace's interview with Bill Clinton was supposed to be about Clinton Global Initiative and some minutes spared for anything else.

Link to Transcript
It began with introduction, some how-are-you-and-what's-up-with-you, etc... and then Wallace warmed up the conversation toward to what he wants to get some dirt on - the 9/11 subject.

Wallace began with

and then Wallace kept on asking - WHY WHY WHY WHY?

Here's Clinton's answer that basically OWNED him


Wallace should have stuck with Global Initiative topic and then use the remaining spare time on something else. This sleezy bastard thinks he can make a fame out of it :nono: In case you didn't know - Clinton is one of the famous and best orators and debaters. He's been doing it for decades since college (or high school). I'm sure he can handle any hardball questions you can throw at him but if you're gonna come up with a cheap-shot question like what Wallace did, you bet your ass that you will get a sucker punch in return especially from a seasoned debater. Wallace asked a question. He will get the answer in return... no matter if he doesn't like it or not but he cannot try to change subject if he didn't get the answer he wants in front of live tv with million viewers. :nono:

TRY AGAIN!


ah ah ah... :nono: :nono:...

Clinton couldn't stomach the question and he went on and on about these conspiracy theories like a schizo-paranoid person. It was just a question, and Clinton lost his temper like an angry little boy...wagging his finger, always touching Wallace's knee as way to somehow gain control of the conversation. Watch the video. Watch his body language. His own ego owned him.

I agree, Clinton is a master debater.
 
ah ah ah... :nono: :nono:...

Clinton couldn't stomach the question and he went on and on about these conspiracy theories like a schizo-paranoid person. It was just a question, and Clinton lost his temper like an angry little boy...wagging his finger, always touching Wallace's knee as way to somehow gain control of the conversation. Watch the video. Watch his body language. His own ego owned him.

I agree, Clinton is a master debater.

so that's what you say....

If you look at the video - you can see based on Chris Wallace's gesture, grin, and his line of questionings... it was very obvious that he was trying to control the interview in attempt to vilify Clinton. Clinton knew what he was trying to pull and obviously Bill didn't appreciate that cheap shot maneuver. but you know what? he handled it quite well with intelligence like Chelsea dealt with foolish reporter who asked inappropriately about Clinton's sex scandal during Presidential campaign for Hillary. What's the matter, Chris? Can't handle it? aawwwww :aw: Perhaps he should do local news.

Barbara Walters can handle it better. Too bad she's retired. I've enjoyed her in-depth interviews quite immensely.
 
Jiro, he was more like bemused and with certain disbelief when Clinton started to accuse him with all kinds of conspiracy charges. Watch and listen, and follow the transcript if you have to (I'm assuming you can hear enough of the details, so correct me if that's not the case).

Chris handled it well. He's not the one who popped his cork. You could almost see his head turn red.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top