^Angel^ said:If hearing aids don't benefit some deaf children , then what do you expect them to wear if you hate CI with passion
well... what she wants is that if HA don't benefit some deaf children then that's it and just sign.
^Angel^ said:If hearing aids don't benefit some deaf children , then what do you expect them to wear if you hate CI with passion
Boult said:well... what she wants is that if HA don't benefit some deaf children then that's it and just sign.
I thought you already made up your mind that you won't get one at all so don't get one just wait for regeneration to succeed or try nanotechnology when they finally make it available in a decade or few...Cheri said:In my case, hearing aids don't benefit for me at all, I don't want to get a CI for a lot of reasons, surgery isn't my thing which involves to the head behind the ears *Yikes*, don't want to experience headaches all the time while wearing it, other minor issues, If it doesn't work for me, What am I got'ta do? I'll be out of luck. That's something I don't want to look forward to.
Boult said:I thought you already made up your mind that you won't get one at all so don't get one just wait for regeneration to succeed or try nanotechnology when they finally make it available in a decade or few...
At least we're not shooting each other here.CutePommie said:Oh Bloody hell!! i didnt know that the WORLD WARS III has start .!!
Or stay deaf?Boult said:I thought you already made up your mind that you won't get one at all so don't get one just wait for regeneration to succeed or try nanotechnology when they finally make it available in a decade or few...
regarding headaches... for me, none coming from CI, I have had headache due to various factors that cause headache in any person without CI. this last statement is not in a way to persuade you, just informing you.
I had mine back in 2003 and I am 41 now.Cheri said:I've made up my mind the day My grandma showed me pictures of CI, that she asked me if I was interested, I was like *yikes* that's going on my head? Don't you think I'm too old to get one now? Couple years later in the future I'll be walking with a cane.
that won't make sense, I am already deaf to begin with. CI delivers me sound while I am deaf. ehgnulinuxman said:Or stay deaf?
If deafness is working for you, then great! I myself have a friend with a cochlear implant, but I still use ASL with her because she understands me better that way. (I met her on a day her CI was broken, so she was totally deaf. I signed to her because she can't lipread, but she was glad we both knew ASL!)Cheri said:In my case, hearing aids don't benefit for me at all, I don't want to get a CI for a lot of reasons, surgery isn't my thing which involves to the head behind the ears *Yikes*, don't want to experience headaches all the time while wearing it, other minor issues, If it doesn't work for me, What am I got'ta do? I'll be out of luck. That's something I don't want to look forward to.
Boult said:that won't make sense, I am already deaf to begin with. CI delivers me sound while I am deaf. eh
OK, I aplogize for being confusing. I meant an option was to remain unimplanted.Boult said:that won't make sense, I am already deaf to begin with. CI delivers me sound while I am deaf. eh
Why on Earth would I mean "death"? About half of my best friends are deaf, and I don't care whether they have a cochlear implant or not. I just don't like the trend of implanting babies. That's all I'm getting at.Cheri said:gnulinuxman,
You meant "death"? That's what some hearies think that's what the word for "deaf" means
Boult said:well... what she wants is that if HA don't benefit some deaf children then that's it and just sign.
Keep an open mind.
" A critical thing to remember is that one must also be flexible! Needs change, circumstances change, your child changes! What was a good choice yesterday may not be a good one tomorrow for many reasons! "
— Peter's Mom
Cheri said:In my case, hearing aids don't benefit for me at all, I don't want to get a CI for a lot of reasons, surgery isn't my thing which involves to the head behind the ears *Yikes*, don't want to experience headaches all the time while wearing it, other minor issues, If it doesn't work for me, What am I got'ta do? I'll be out of luck. That's something I don't want to look forward to.
Cheri said:In my case, hearing aids don't benefit for me at all, I don't want to get a CI for a lot of reasons, surgery isn't my thing which involves to the head behind the ears *Yikes*, don't want to experience headaches all the time while wearing it, other minor issues, If it doesn't work for me, What am I got'ta do? I'll be out of luck. That's something I don't want to look forward to.
Boult said:I had mine back in 2003 and I am 41 now.
...
I agree. She doesn't want another child to go through what she did. Personally, I think it's sweet.
No kidding. You're citing someone who makes money off music.
Yes indeed...^Angel^ said:That's sad cause they could never again hear a sound but only silence..Perhaps she needs to focus on what every deaf child want and what CI can benefit many of them when they couldn't get enough benefit out of hearing aids and she also have to be aware that not all deaf people use the same method to communicate, They might use American sign language, english sign, finger spelling, spoken english, lip-reading or etc...
At the bottom this is one of my fave quote, I thought I would share this with you all
I have an objection to your use of the word "need". Nobody NEEDS a cochlear implant to live a good life. You don't need one to live independently, communicate, drive, etc. Here's a whole list: http://www.cochlearwar.com/deaf_can_do.htmlAudiofuzzy said:Sadly, this clouds her judgemnt so no I am not convinced it is at all sweet. She may be depriving some child who needs CI because of her influenced judgment.
Yes, my point is, do you NEED it?? Most of my deaf friends would say NO. They're living just fine without cochlear implants.Audiofuzzy said:You can look at hearing two ways- as deaf person- you can look at it at as curse or as a gift. Either way you are deaf, but with the GIFT of SOME hearing you can hear what you wouldn't otherwise. It can actually ENRICH you as a deaf person.
True, but she says her parents were uninformed. and didn't know better.Audiofuzzy said:Take Sweetmind, for example. I can imagine how she was growing up probably isolated from deaf culture, in family who didn't make any effort to make communication easier for her. She fel less worthy because of that, frustrated, hurt, angry because she couldn't communicate freely and when she discovered deaf culture it emphasized all this lack of effort on part of her family toward her deafness.
I disagree. The point here is not ability to speak orally vs. manually. The point here is that forcing oralism on deaf children has been known to cause some serious problems in language development. Deaf people do not need to be taught to speak first--why not treat it like a foreign language, for example?Audiofuzzy said:But at the same she was forced to communicate orally and that is in fact a gift - she learned to hear with HAs and lipread, and speak very well.
But -looks like- she does not realise she received a gift, in fact.
For her it's more like a curse. It really isn't. It was the way they treated her that was wrong.
Yeah, even though I'm hearing I'm part of both worlds. However, the common belief here seems to be that you need to hear to be part of both worlds, but deaflinuxgeek and sweetmind are unimplanted deaf people and still part of both worlds.Audiofuzzy said:Being able to hear, speak is not wrong- is an ability, learned ability and practical. It does not have to separate one from deaf culture and one's identity as Deaf.
You missed my point.Audiofuzzy said:Music is something that you can not speak of unless you have experienced it. I was granted this wonderful possibility to hear music.
Music like many other arts is something that inspires your SPIRIT. You can live without it but then you miss something vital.
Very few pple are unaffected by music. (or other forms of art).
Um, sort of. My avatar is a girl from a TV show, and I put her there because I identify very much with her. But I wouldn't say TV is necessary to function in society.Audiofuzzy said:You don't always realise how much art affects you, take TV for example. Any show is show of art form it is called acting (and clothes, and light and background- it all matters), these shows can make you laugh or cry or be angry or irritated or whatever. Do you think consciously what it does to you? I don't think so - you just absorb it, feel it, You don't analyze it. But the fact is it does do something to you.
I never said that. I said it isn't necessary for functioning in society. Those are two different things.Audiofuzzy said:But think about it- if it was as unaffecting, unimportant as you say would people all over the world spend so much money on music? make these musicians so rich, so celebrated? MTV would not exist without this need for music. Every song is written with some idea some calling behind it. Theye are messages in songs and music. This IS communication.
Even Momoftwo's children surely listen to some KIND of music which makes it a SELECTION, which shows that in some way music does matter to them. They do not listen to just ANY music, do they?
I enjoy music, but so does my fiancee too, even though she only feels vibrations.Audiofuzzy said:I like music. Music was important to me when I was growing up, still is and the only thing that prevent me from enjoying it is migraine, not deafness.
Fuzzy
Cloggy I think you meant your wife is professional not personal flute player..