The idea that him 'getting around without a cane' is obviously seen as an accomplishment really, really irks me. It's on the line of saying "deaf children can get by with just their residual hearing- they don't really need sign or speechreading"- except in this case, he's putting himself in danger. A person who is blind is a person who is blind, totally blind or not. And we need canes. Because canes mean safety, identification especially at streets, and an overall sense of self-acceptance and independence. There is nothing to be proud of by not using a cane.
Re the comment about following pedestrians: pedestrians DO cross when it's not their signal. When I lived in chicago, they did this more often than they walked on their correct signal. That is a fact, and not accepting that and judging for yourself when it is safe to cross.. is asking to become roadkill. Because blind people HAVE died when they crossed with the assurance of pedestrians or motorists.
I also agree with this. At one stage I had more sight and didn't 'need' a cane but I found that with a cane I walked so much faster and with much more confidence. I also found I could keep an eye on Jilli while navigating with my cane at the same time.