So what sounds will be like for deaf person who get CI late and never had hear sounds in his/her life? Just like radio static?
Yes, indeedy! That is why it's important for even oral sucesses to pick up ASL/Sign as a second language. Just b/c a kid can "hear" with a person who's a good speaker, it doesn't mean that they'll be able to function well in ALL situtions.In a small classroom where people are quiet and respectful towards the teacher, I have NO problem understanding speech. That's one reason why I decided (at age 35) to go back to college. Same goes for a small gathering of people, or one-on-one conversation with others.
However go into a room where lots of people are talking, and the background conversation can impede your ability to discern speech.
Then you have to take into consideration the speaker - do they speak clearly? Do they enunciate well? Perhaps they have a lisp, or a stutter, or an accent. Perhaps they speak too fast - all these can make understanding their speech difficult.
*drops a book*
Can you hear that? I bet you did. But, do you know what that sound was? Probably not.
The same thing applies to those who have cochlear implants. They may hear the teacher, but will they understand what the teacher is saying? That's the question the student should be asking when deciding whether or not an interpreter is needed.
I've seen some students at NTID/RIT who get cochlear implants and immediately say they can hear everything. So, they stop signing. They don't request interpreters any more. They start hanging out with only hearing people. They leave all relations to deafness behind.
Months later, they fail classes because they can't understand the teacher very well. They can't understand the hearing people very well. They're in denial. They've lost their deaf friends. They leave school.
*drops a book*
Can you hear that? I bet you did. But, do you know what that sound was? Probably not.
The same thing applies to those who have cochlear implants. They may hear the teacher, but will they understand what the teacher is saying? That's the question the student should be asking when deciding whether or not an interpreter is needed.
I've seen some students at NTID/RIT who get cochlear implants and immediately say they can hear everything. So, they stop signing. They don't request interpreters any more. They start hanging out with only hearing people. They leave all relations to deafness behind.
Months later, they fail classes because they can't understand the teacher very well. They can't understand the hearing people very well. They're in denial. They've lost their deaf friends. They leave school.
Even though I have bilateral CIs, I still use CART and an FM system in the clasroom due to poor acoustics and my inability to see to lipread. Last semester I was grateful for these accommodations due to the large lecture halls (200+ students) my classes were in.
Before I returned to school following my second CI surgery, I considered only using an FM syem in the classroom, but am glad I requested CART in addition to the FM. I was also worried that my university's D/HH office would refuse my request, but even they understood the difficulty I would have trying to hear in a large lecture hall.
In my opinion, the more tools one has in their communication toolbox, the better.
In our daughters case - No. We used sign until Lotte started using speech only..A student has CI so should she get an interpreter in mainstream school? Since CI would help her to be able to hear what teacher has to say, so do she need interpreter or not? Or she will be able to survive through her middle/high school years without interpreter?
In our daughters case - No. We used sign until Lotte started using speech only..
Not knowing sign - except some basic signs that still stick - she has never had an interpreter. In the last 2 years, at a kindergarten between hearing children.
In august she will start school. This will be a big step, and teachers will have to be aware how to interact with her.
All the preparations for the best possible start have began and the school, us and Lotte are looking forward to the beginning of a new era in Lotte's life. An interpreter is not part of the preparations..
Terps in public school kindergartens are more like teacher aides. The kids don't know the difference between a teacher and a terp. They think all grownups at school are "teachers". Also terps for little kids usually have collateral duties such as helping the kids in the bathroom, changing diapers, playground and lunchroom duty, and interacting with the teacher.I have never heard of terps in the kindergarten, how does that look like?
Why would you assume it's luck? It's not. It's a combination of work from our side, from Lotte's side and from people around us................ You really have to place all your luck on a mainstream setting without terp. Hope it works out well, because there are no easy exits if that fails.
AMEN! I'm for the whole toolbox approach.
For the most part, I don't need a terp to interact on a one to one basis but I certainly will need a terp for classes as I have trouble following the converation in groups larger than 4 and I do best in classes that don't have a heavy lecture format due to problems with ADD.
The CI does not take away the deafness, they are still born deaf and will die deaf. CIs are a tool that can be very helpful.
In our daughters case - No. We used sign until Lotte started using speech only..
Not knowing sign - except some basic signs that still stick - she has never had an interpreter. In the last 2 years, at a kindergarten between hearing children.
In august she will start school. This will be a big step, and teachers will have to be aware how to interact with her.
All the preparations for the best possible start have began and the school, us and Lotte are looking forward to the beginning of a new era in Lotte's life. An interpreter is not part of the preparations..
Nope, Deaf pp with CI and hearing people will disagree with you. They claimed that CI is work of miracle and restoring deaf to be back in hearing world. :sure:
Nope, Deaf pp with CI and hearing people will disagree with you. They claimed that CI is work of miracle and restoring deaf to be back in hearing world. :sure:
You see that's what happens when people are misinformed. Just today I was speaking to the education liason on an implant center. She said that there was a doctor that would happen children in his office and then send a note to the school to treat the child like he was hearing. The doctor passed away which is sad but at least he is not implanting anymore. That is so wrong. I am not sure who you talk too but I always make sure that people know that CIs can be a very valuable tool is used correctly with the right training. Some people who have CIs might think it is a miracle because of what it has allowed them to do and it is their right to think that but I make sure parents do not think it is miracle because then they stop doing the work they need too.
The doctor told the school to treat them like they can hear like hearing kids??? That is scary! Oh, I cant imagine the struggles those kids got afterwards if the schools stopped giving them resources! Wow!
When the education liason was telling me this, it made me so awful, it was bad for both of us because we both have teenagers with implants and we know how much hard work was involved and the services that we fought and still fight for. Our kids are successful because of all the hard work. This is why I am going to do something about here where I am at. I am going to be contacting all the implant centers in my area and giving my time to help educate their parents.
. Then, the Deaf community sees that on TV and newspapers and hence we have this controversity.