jillio
New Member
- Joined
- Jun 14, 2006
- Messages
- 60,232
- Reaction score
- 22
Oh, okay. Thanks. Phew..
YW. I thought maybe there was a misunderstanding.
Oh, okay. Thanks. Phew..
Where exactly did I tell you that you can't be pro-life? I think you have misunderstood again.#270 post...
I'm a consistent ethic of life for pro-life yet you called them, inculding myself, "not pro-life" or this post calls me a lair because what I beleive for. Nonsense!
Look.. Let me tell you something.
I donate some moneys with my anonymous name to poor shelters for homeless families.
I donate some moneys with my anonymous name to some hospitals for cancer patients.
Probably, next year, I will give up one of my own kidnseys to any one who need it and I can get one fake kidnsey for me.
I personally did a few things to give them because this life does matter to me.
I sign up to stop animal cruelity a few times.
Now, you tell me that I can't be pro-life. That's so much friendly fair for you to tell me a "no". :Sighs:
Where exactly did I tell you that you can't be pro-life? I think you have misunderstood again.
I refer to that links you post it.
I'd be careful about donating a kidney on the hopes that you will get a "fake one" for yourself. There is no such thing as a fake kidney. Once you donate one, you ave only one left for the rest of your life.
Yeah, I knew it.. Somebody else claimed there is some fake kidneys and I debated with this person but I gave up. But, I glad you mention it so I will tell him once again. There is no fake kidneys. Aha..
EDIT: I still am gong to give up my own kidney to give somebody who need it.
And post #270 is not composed of my words. I provided the websites from which they were taken.
#270 post...
I'm a consistent ethic of life for pro-life yet you called them, inculding myself, "not pro-life" or this post calls me a lair because what I beleive for. Nonsense!
Look.. Let me tell you something.
I donate some moneys with my anonymous name to poor shelters for homeless families.
I donate some moneys with my anonymous name to some hospitals for cancer patients.
Probably, next year (or two years), I will give up one of my own kidnseys to any one who need it and I probably can get one fake kidnsey for me.
I personally did a few things to give them because this life does matter to me.
I sign up to stop animal cruelity a few times.
Now, you tell me that I can't be pro-life. That's so much friendly fair for you to tell me a "no". :Sighs:
Don't we all wish the world's fair and friendly?
No, She was speaking of Cheri simply because she support the "death penalty" :roll:
No, She was speaking of Cheri simply because she support the "death penalty" :roll:
Don't worry about it.
I found #270 post so interesting to me.
Thank you, Karrissa. Post # 270 was not in reference to any singualr person. Especially since the originators of these documents don't know anyone on AD.
Angel, if it is your intent to make accusations simply to cause trouble, then I suggest you take it somewhere else. As has already been stated, these words came from 3 different website, and I doubt seriously that any of them even know or care who your sister is. Likewise, I did not mention your sister's name in my post at all, and for you to assume such is going a bit above and beyond.
Excuse me, the trouble began way before I arrive Jillio, the whole arguements between you and Cheri about the death penalty and which beliefs fit in her categories. No matter what you say or Cheri say, nothing will change each others opinions. just might as well quit while you're ahead and I have my own beliefs I don't go on and on about it through.
With claws or without. Can’t we all just get along?
I wasn't trying to change anyone's opinion, and the post you are referring to had nothing to do with a specific person. Likewise, it led to a reasonable discussion between myself and several other members, regarding the accepted definition of a term, until you jumped in with your unfounded accusation. This is called a debate for a reason. Without differeing opinions it would not be a debate.
If you wish to get along, I suggest you refrain from making unfounded accusations.
Excuse me, I don't see myself making any public judgement in this thread or in any other thread, what makes it right for you to do so? Anyways, I will not continue with the onslaught barrage of inconsistencies and judging in here, if you want to partake and continue with it, do it in PM, not here.
You missed the point.The comparision you made is a fallicious because it´s an illegal for drinker to drive accord the law, not abortion. They violate the law when they know it´s an illegal. Abortion?
If there is a law for abortion as an illegal like drunk driver then you make correct comparison.
You missed the point.
That is the whole point. To make abortion illegal will not stop it. It will only result in more deaths of women at the hands of the illegal practitioners.
Let's discuss the reality. Abortion vs. Death penalty comparison seems ridiculous. Those two issues a different angle entirely different.. I think it is because you who say the two are the same have no logical way to make that claim.
For death penalty, is putting people to death based on being judged after committed certain extremely crimes, When they are sentence to death, they usually sit on death row for many years and get many chances for appeal.
No if anyone who claim that they are pro-lifer which mean is they don´t beleive in take human´s life away.
For abortion, The mothers puts her own wants above the baby's needs, and terminated her pregnancy it's like saying an unwanted baby was better off dead. However, the baby in the womb has done no wrong yet it is executed. It's wrong and this is why abortion is wrong, nothing more nothing less. Pro-choicers would say life in the womb isn't human. If that was true, you wouldn't see the head, the legs and the arms.
Would you prefer to see an unwanted child suffer to recieve unloving or abuse from their mother? It also punish the child as well for allow his/her life suffer like this if her mother are forced by law to have an unwanted child? Is it fair for a child to see kind of life he/she grew up and suffering? To me, abusive and unwanted child is the mainly worst than fetus removal during early pregnancy.
It's not hypocritical at all.
I would consider myself as a hypocritical if I claim that I am pro-life when I know that I do not support "all" kind of taking human´s life away because I support abortion and euthanasia as a legal and not war and death penalty. Some people who claim that they are pro-lifers for support war and death penalty.
ha ha!! I'll say the same about you, It's hypocritical to kill an unborn baby, but let a murderer live at the same time.
Look how hypocritical to be pro-abortion and anti-death penalty; You are so convicted that murderers hold more value than babies. It just shows that you defend murderers, pedophiles, rapists and etc.