Cloggy
New Member
- Joined
- Feb 21, 2005
- Messages
- 4,703
- Reaction score
- 0
Well, at least that's a new argument.................
I wouldn't be surprised if there's another advanced technology comin' than CI's ... meanin' somethin' else they invent better than CI.. gee, it would be wasted for those who want somethin' new. Let's just say for example:
First, people bought Nintendo and then, when a new game technology comes, there's Playstation and, then Playstation 2 and then 3 and so on... and now there's Wii. The CI will do the same thing in the near future and I think it is foolish to replace somethin' else repeatly in every time when somethin' new comes up. So such a waste ! I think it is too much.
So, you compare CI, around before most of the computers, with computergames that are changed out every 5 years.
Actually... it's a good comparison.
Look at how fast technology is going ! !
New developments make it possible to upgrade systems constantly. New software making the system better every time. Imaging the difference between a CI 10 years ago and a CI now. And the beautiful thing is: the electrode under the skin is capable of following the trend for a long time. When the processor is upgraded (remember... PS-1, PS-3, PS-3, WII etc) the processor with the electrode can be upgraded as well.
That's wonderful news. Glad you brought it up...
You say - "such a waist" - but what kind of computer are you using.
Please tell me you are using the computer from 10 years ago, because you seem to think all the upgrades are a waist..
So, tell me please - what kind of computer are you using?