Declaration of Occupy Wall Street

Status
Not open for further replies.
jillio said:
You aren't? I thought you were claiming these people were engaging in illegal behavior, and that they started throwing objects provoking the cops. Hmmm...I'm sure I saw that somewhere.:hmm:
Click to expand...

That was me :wave:
 
jillio said:
Fighting with the cops is hardly the intent of the OWS protest. Even though the conservative right wants to make it appear that way. Perhaps they are the ones planning and throwing objects?:cool2:
Click to expand...

Umm .... yeah, and the OWS witness claiming that protesters were throwing rocks and bottles at police was really a Karl Rove plant .... yeah .... yeah ...
 
TXgolfer said:
Umm, you are the one making the claim....

Two things though

A) I am certain that OPD didn't give up their right to use crowd dispersant. Why would they give up more than the Grant protesters were seeking?

B) Being that the officers on the front line were Sheriffs (Clearly seen in the video) It's doubtful they would be bound by and agreement made by OPD :lol:
Click to expand...

You absolutely rock :giggle:

She is soo busted but will pretend she isn't. It is really funny to watch.
 
Steinhauer said:
You know ... the police might actually be able to do something about that if they could actually get to the crime scene without having bottles and rocks thrown at them.
Click to expand...

Yeah, just like they got to the man who was injured, what: 20 feet in front of them with them in full riot gear? Didn't see much bravery and protecting and serving going on there. But hey, maybe they could lob a flash grenade in, or throw a tear gas canister.:roll:

No, that wouldn't work. They only use those tactics in Oakland when someone is trying to help an injured person. Injured citizens don't seem to be high on OPD's list of priorities.
 
That link sounds like it was written by a 4th grader who had an assignment to make up a story.:giggle:

Witnesses that refuse to give their real names, referring to a rapist as "sex fiend", claims by people that won't use their name that people just let the "sex fiend pevert" go.

GAWD that was funny.

And this is supposed to be a credible source.:laugh2:
 
Heh you weren't kidding, Jillio. The New York Post doesn't exactly come across as unbiased either.
 
jillio said:
Yeah, just like they got to the man who was injured, what: 20 feet in front of them with them in full riot gear? Didn't see much bravery and protecting and serving going on there. But hey, maybe they could lob a flash grenade in, or throw a tear gas canister.:roll:

No, that wouldn't work. They only use those tactics in Oakland when someone is trying to help an injured person. Injured citizens don't seem to be high on OPD's list of priorities.
Click to expand...

Um ... that settlement agreement you were discussing, did it ban the OPD from using tear gas?
 
deafskeptic said:
Heh you weren't kidding, Jillio. The New York Post doesn't exactly come across as unbiased either.
Click to expand...

Wonder if a certain someone has found those settlement details yet? They sure can't be found in a rag like the Post.:lol:
 
Steinhauer said:
I see .... MSNBC isn't credible when it reports something not aligned to your preconceived bias.
Click to expand...

That was not an MSNBC link. Nor was the one I was referring to. However, I have posted several NSNBC links in this thread myself. Most of them dispute everything you are saying.
 
jillio said:
That was not an MSNBC link. Nor was the one I was referring to. However, I have posted several NSNBC links in this thread myself. Most of them dispute everything you are saying.
Click to expand...

I guess for Steiny, the only creditable links are supermarket tabloids. :roll:
 
jillio said:
That was not an MSNBC link. Nor was the one I was referring to. However, I have posted several NSNBC links in this thread myself. Most of them dispute everything you are saying.
Click to expand...

The link I provided was a transcript website. I kind of figured, since this forum is comprised of mostly deaf and HoH individuals, they would actually want to know what was being said in the MSNBC video (duh).

And if that actually went over your head - they were transcribing a MSNBC video.
 
jillio said:
Wonder if a certain someone has found those settlement details yet? They sure can't be found in a rag like the Post.:lol:
Click to expand...

I have to confess I haven't read anything much futher than that article in NYP. :lol: I doubt I will find it there though.
 
jillio said:
Wonder if a certain someone has found those settlement details yet? They sure can't be found in a rag like the Post.:lol:
Click to expand...

I found them quite a while ago.....Just waiting for your answer to the simple yes or no question....
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top