- Joined
- Jul 26, 2009
- Messages
- 19,035
- Reaction score
- 8
And yet you seem willing to defend cops even when they're clearly in the wrong to most people.
As I said....Our opinions differ.
And yet you seem willing to defend cops even when they're clearly in the wrong to most people.
Flip flop, flip flop.
Nope, I have been clear the entire time.
Yep, clearly flip flopping.
Again that's just speculation. We may as well just move on unless you have proof. Hopefully we will have an official answer soon.
If it's found that the police INTENTIONALLY shot him in the face I hope they are held accountable
Seeing how 90% of 1,800 arrests were unlawful in the past.... yep this is another typical case of unlawful order. and seeing that Oakland PD is notorious for police brutality, police corruptions, and civil rights violations... yep another case of unlawful order.
what does it matter if all 3 options are not illegal? It's America. You're free to make a choice and cops are free to make poor/illegal choice as well.
that's fine. You can shrug all you want but this war hero is not going to shrug and let them trample over his rights.
Was she there after being ordered to leave?
There is a 3rd option One could walk away like a law abiding British subject and file your complaints legally through the local magistrate if one feels the actions are wrong
You are wrong
My post 1014
The Founding Fathers FIFY
The Founding Fathers FIFY
I think my IQ just dropped 30 points right now.
not sure why you're using this line one too many timesYou are entitled to your opinion
That's not the case in here. It was an unlawful order to begin with.Disobeying a police order is not legal
yes and it's not illegal nor wrong.That is his choice
OWS needs to stop this amateur stuff. Just drive in mornng rush hour traffic and ... stop.
They can block traffic .... peacefully, as they call it. Then whine and moan all they want to when they are forcibly removed by force.
Stop the morning slave train feeding the corporate world .... yeah man ...