Good post. Thanks for sharing with me. I didn't even realize that.Ariakkas said:mute is not a negative word. and it is not used only in correlation to d/Deaf people. Mute means cannot talk....you can be fully hearing and not have talking capabilities.
throat cancer, birth defects and god know what else can cause a person to lose thier speech.
ChelEler said:To me, it kinda makes the difference. It's almost like having the power.. but really, there's no power there unless you work with someone in a higher class. For like an example... Deaf vs. deaf. Deaf is more like a dominant than deaf. the word "deaf" just tell the person that the person is just deaf, but not part of the deaf community. That's what I feel it means. So look at this with "HoH" and "hoh." I may be wrong.
deafdyke said:I use both deaf and HoH interchangabily for me . . . I am a journalism student and my copybook does NOT have the term "hearing impaired" as an acceptable term . . . I hate the archaic terms deaf and dumb/mute as well. However the gross majority of the people who use those terms are old. Back when they were young deaf-dumb or deaf- mute were acceptable terms . . .that context....they aren't calling the person deaf-mute....they are saying that they are deaf and cannot speak.
ChelEler said:Very interesting opinions here. Any more ideas, oldies and join us, newbies.
illustrator said:I notice that most hard of hearing are more like smart-ass and big ego than deaf.
When HoH tell me to stop use my voice because for sometime I make funny voice. It seems bother them. And also, they usually complain about my grammar. I don't like it. I felt that they show no respect to truly deaf.
VamPyroX said:I know what you mean. The same thing goes for me. Hearing impaired makes me sound like I'm mentally challenged. However, when filling out a government related application... I must say hearing impaired, not hard-of-hearing.
sr171soars said:Allright, allright, nobody will come out and say it. I'm hearing challenged. *Sigh* We need at least one politically correct statement around here.
Truth be told...I don't care one iota. I just go by my moniker that I'm a hearing person who happens to be deaf! Let somebody else figure it out...
DoofusMama said:I prefer "Hearing Impaired"
why?
I noticed alot of times whatever I say.. "I am deaf" the people freak out or back out or not talking me.. its like I am a diease to them.
When i said.. "I am Hearing Impaired" the people show respected and conserve the communicate without frustrations and like I am one of them..
weird.. so i prefer saying Hearing Impaired.. than DEAF..
For example in the other thread.. about Drunk DEAF woman.. some complained about "DEAF"
so.. she is deaf and she was drunk.. she made huge mistake.. why complaining?
CODAchild said:I just asked my husband what term he prefers "Deaf" or "hearing impaired"?
He told me Deaf, because that is the way he was born. He says "impaired" it sounds like the Deaf are "broken" and they are not!!! I agree with him 100 percent. I myself like "Deaf".
When my husband and I are out with my son. People watch at how he signs, and they say to me "he cannot hear"? I explain to them, "he is "deaf". One couple said to us, we don't like to be called "old", we like "elderly" better, so they understood where we were coming from.