Cop Rookie shot a naked black man

Mookie said:
922418966
Ladies, take it easy and thank you...
Click to expand...

Sorry.... :Oops:
 
ButterflyGirl said:
You say not all cops are telling the truth....well, you got to admit that there are several good cops out there. Sure there are some bad cops but not ALL. BTW, do you have a proof that we are heading towards the Miltary Police? I doubt that it will happen. You may like to own a gun but you need to remember NOT everyone likes to own one. I am one of them who hate the idea of owning a gun.
Click to expand...

I did not say all. Of course, not everyone likes to own one. I am just sayin' my pieces what my opinions are. That's all. You don't need to jump in to say your pieces for Angel. We are doin' fine on our own. :)

I will provide an information about the Military Police. Please, bear with me. Ok ? Thanks ! ( Right now, I am eatin' my supper. After that, I will feed my dogs. )
 
CyberRed said:
I did not say all. Of course, not everyone likes to own one. I am just sayin' my pieces what my opinions are. That's all. You don't need to jump in to say your pieces for Angel. We are doin' fine on our own. :)

I will provide an information about the Military Police. Please, bear with me. Ok ? Thanks ! ( Right now, I am eatin' my supper. After that, I will feed my dogs. )
Click to expand...
I am not jumping in to "say my pieces". I just read and happen to disagree with some of what you said so I had to say something from my opinion.
 
My apologizes. Thank you, Mookie. :)


ButterFlyGirl : Ok, here's the link. Feel free to examine/ investigate.

Keep and Bear Arms
http://keepandbeararms.com/about/praise1.asp

Read "About Us" in this link and also you are more than
welcome to browse. Feel free to read and learn. Happy readin' ! :)
 
CyberRed said:
My apologizes. Thank you, Mookie. :)


ButterFlyGirl : Ok, here's the link. Feel free to examine/ investigate.

Keep and Bear Arms
http://keepandbeararms.com/about/praise1.asp

Read "About Us" in this link and also you are more than
welcome to browse. Feel free to read and learn. Happy readin' ! :)
Click to expand...


This web site is for gun owners and I am not one of them I still do not see anything that say what will happen in 10 to 20 years.....
 
^Angel^ said:
This web site is for gun owners and I am not one of them I still do not see anything that say what will happen in 10 to 20 years.....
Click to expand...

Speakin' of 10 to 20 years, I was talkin' about the Military/State Police. Things will change in the future from today. Don't worry about it, because you haven't seen it just yet - like I said, wait until 10 to 20 years later and, then things will change.

The reason I brought that up is because, I was flabbergasted when I read about that young Cuban boy who was rescued by U.S. - remember that story ? It happened in Florida. But, anyways.. the military "police" as I called them barged in that young boy's relative's house.. gee - that's very brutual. They intidimated people down there. They wore an army uniform and carried their rifles. They are NOT "regular" police. I will NEVER forget that day when that happened. Soo... that was how I got to know about them and it will happen in the future.

And, again - my apologizes if, that goes off - topic.
 
deffamilia said:
First of all, I believe you can read well and already know the "black boy's" name is(DONALD COATES)by the end of article.Therefore, you could have used his name instead of saying "Black boy"..You wouldn't refer to the officer as the "white officer" etc.... Also, the questions you asked in terms of "why??" has nothing to do with the case nor gives the police the right to kill him when Donald Coates was unarmed!!!! He was naked for crying out loud, where was he supposed to pull a weapon from?? a HOLE?? Have you ever heard of "pepper spray"?? Why wasnt it used as a first choice than making the decision he made to shoot him not once but MANY times? Police Officers are highly trained to know when to use the weapons and I m sure you will agree to that . However, I find it odd that you back the police 100 % when the police could have handled it differently. Also since when are police officers not out to PROTECT the people?? Last I recalled we were not supposed to just take the law into ur own hands UNLESS we have suffice reasons and until then that is where the police come into play... ever heard of " Protect and Serve the citizens of the United States?? Check your facts!
Click to expand...

Just because a naked guy is unarmed does not mean he has no gun. What if he taped the gun on his back ? Also you are missing something here. The black boy broke the law in the first place. He was smoking dope and shooting bullets in the house and the 911 dispatcher heard the gunfire.

Therefore, the police showed up aggressively because the criminal meant to kill people tonight and he was high.

The police officer had no time to call for backup. He had to act on his own in self defense.

I back the police 100%.

People are tired and fed up with crime.
 
Heath said:
Just because a naked guy is unarmed does not mean he has no gun. What if he taped the gun on his back ?
Click to expand...


If he tape a gun on his back when he is naked? You'll be able to tell if he has tape around his belly to back to hold his weapon. :ugh: Beside there was no weapon on him, therefore that gives the police no right to shot this guy numeric of times.
 
C.C.Sinned said:
maybe the gun was up his butt :giggle:


just trying to joke :thumb:
Click to expand...


Or tape it around his balls, Surprise the gun didn't go off. :giggle:
 
CyberRed said:
Speakin' of 10 to 20 years, I was talkin' about the Military/State Police. Things will change in the future from today. Don't worry about it, because you haven't seen it just yet - like I said, wait until 10 to 20 years later and, then things will change.

The reason I brought that up is because, I was flabbergasted when I read about that young Cuban boy who was rescued by U.S. - remember that story ? It happened in Florida. But, anyways.. the military "police" as I called them barged in that young boy's relative's house.. gee - that's very brutual. They intidimated people down there. They wore an army uniform and carried their rifles. They are NOT "regular" police. I will NEVER forget that day when that happened. Soo... that was how I got to know about them and it will happen in the future.

And, again - my apologizes if, that goes off - topic.
Click to expand...
Yes I remember that story about Elian Gonzales. The guy who pointed his gun at Elian was an Immigration agent not a police officer. They were ordered to go get the boy by Janet Reno who was US Attorney General at that time. Blame that on her not the police.
 
deffamilia said:
First of all, I believe you can read well and already know the "black boy's" name is(DONALD COATES)by the end of article.Therefore, you could have used his name instead of saying "Black boy"..You wouldn't refer to the officer as the "white officer" etc.... Also, the questions you asked in terms of "why??" has nothing to do with the case nor gives the police the right to kill him when Donald Coates was unarmed!!!! He was naked for crying out loud, where was he supposed to pull a weapon from?? a HOLE?? Have you ever heard of "pepper spray"?? Why wasnt it used as a first choice than making the decision he made to shoot him not once but MANY times? Police Officers are highly trained to know when to use the weapons and I m sure you will agree to that . However, I find it odd that you back the police 100 % when the police could have handled it differently. Also since when are police officers not out to PROTECT the people?? Last I recalled we were not supposed to just take the law into ur own hands UNLESS we have suffice reasons and until then that is where the police come into play... ever heard of " Protect and Serve the citizens of the United States?? Check your facts!
Click to expand...
Well said there, deffamilia.
 
CyberRed said:
Speakin' of 10 to 20 years, I was talkin' about the Military/State Police. Things will change in the future from today. Don't worry about it, because you haven't seen it just yet - like I said, wait until 10 to 20 years later and, then things will change.
Click to expand...

First you said you will provide a link to Butterfly girl on where you heard about things will change in 10 to 20 years, all you did was provide a link about gun owners?...

And you're saying I haven't seen it yet? and you have? you know whats going to happen in 10 to 20 years? Give me a break.....

I'm done with debate against you cause you have nothing to back up your statment and no one knows what going to happen in the furture either do you
....


Why would I worry? you're the one who brought it up!
 
deffamilia said:
First of all, I believe you can read well and already know the "black boy's" name is(DONALD COATES)by the end of article.Therefore, you could have used his name instead of saying "Black boy"..You wouldn't refer to the officer as the "white officer" etc.... Also, the questions you asked in terms of "why??" has nothing to do with the case nor gives the police the right to kill him when Donald Coates was unarmed!!!! He was naked for crying out loud, where was he supposed to pull a weapon from?? a HOLE?? Have you ever heard of "pepper spray"?? Why wasnt it used as a first choice than making the decision he made to shoot him not once but MANY times? Police Officers are highly trained to know when to use the weapons and I m sure you will agree to that . However, I find it odd that you back the police 100 % when the police could have handled it differently. Also since when are police officers not out to PROTECT the people?? Last I recalled we were not supposed to just take the law into ur own hands UNLESS we have suffice reasons and until then that is where the police come into play... ever heard of " Protect and Serve the citizens of the United States?? Check your facts!
Click to expand...


Amen Well said!!!!
 
CyberRed, I got to say I agree with ^Angel^ because that link that you wanted me to look at has proved nothing about what will happen in 10 to 20 years later.
 
Heath said:
Just because a naked guy is unarmed does not mean he has no gun. What if he taped the gun on his back ?
Click to expand...


Oh my goodness....I think I need a bottle of tylenols... :|
 
^Angel^ said:
First you said you will provide a link to Butterfly girl on where you heard about things will change in 10 to 20 years, all you did was provide a link about gun owners?...

And you're saying I haven't seen it yet? and you have? you know whats going to happen in 10 to 20 years? Give me a break.....

I'm done with debate against you cause you have nothing to back up your statment and no one knows what going to happen in the furture either do you
....


Why would I worry? you're the one who brought it up!
Click to expand...

You misunderstood me. I never said that I HEARD about things will change in 10 to 20 years - gee who told you that I HEARD ? I just said that things WILL change in 10 to 20 years later. It's just the way I SEE things that are changed. Ok ? Look at both ways from the old days and modern days.... I can SEE it changes ALOT than the old days. Too many murders and sky high rocket crimes than before. Do you think the "regular" police could handle this ? I think not. Things will change. Police will merge with the Military/State Police.

It's like with the ocean, for example... in a long time ago, it was not that LOUD like roar, but now it is more and more LOUD ( roar ) than before. It's increasin'. The world changes. I am just givin' you an example.

If, you don't understand - then, never mind. I can debate this with people who are political.
 
ButterflyGirl said:
CyberRed, I got to say I agree with ^Angel^ because that link that you wanted me to look at has proved nothing about what will happen in 10 to 20 years later.
Click to expand...

I am not talkin' about that link that stated will happen in 10 to 20 years later. You were askin' me to prove to you about the Military/State Police, so I provided that link for you to read.
 
Back
Top