'Company Policy: We are not hiring until Obama is gone'

Jiro said:
wwwwoooooooottttttt????? That's not what I said.





I'm asking where did he get "it" that said they're leftist liberals. perhaps it's best if you don't get involved if the question wasn't directed at you.
Click to expand...

Actully, you asked me why "I" was using labels - you used them to desribe Sowell as a 'buffoon'.
 
Jiro said:
racist? liberals? you are the one who used labels.

I didn't. They didn't. Neither did Sowell. Why are you using labels?
Click to expand...

When you point a finger - you have three pointing right back at you.
 
Jiro said:
wwwwoooooooottttttt????? That's not what I said.





I'm asking where did he get "it" that said they're leftist liberals. perhaps it's best if you don't get involved if the question wasn't directed at you.
Click to expand...

:hmm:
 
Steinhauer said:
Actully, you asked me why "I" was using labels - you used them to desribe Sowell as a 'buffoon'.
Click to expand...

um... there's a difference between label and mockery.

I'm mocking Sowell by calling him a buffoon. You are labeling them as "leftist liberal". These are not insulting word. These are actual label.

so Steinhauer.... where did it say that they're leftist liberals?
 
Jiro said:
do you know who are those 1,500 companies? and why they were waived?
Click to expand...

From the WashingtonTimes: "seven entire states and 1,372 businesses, unions and other institutions have received waivers from the law. The list includes the administration’s friends and allies and, of course, those who have the best lobbyists.

More than 50 percent of the Obamacare waiver beneficiaries are union members, which is striking because union members account for less than 12 percent of the American work force. The same unions that provided more than $120 million to Democrats in the last two elections and, in many cases, openly campaigned in favor of the government takeover of your health care, now celebrate that Obamacare is not their problem."

From the Daily Caller: "Of the 204 new Obamacare waivers President Barack Obama’s administration approved in April, 38 are for fancy eateries, hip nightclubs and decadent hotels in House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi’s Northern California district.

That’s in addition to the 27 new waivers for health care or drug companies and the 31 new union waivers Obama’s Department of Health and Human Services approved.

Pelosi’s district secured almost 20 percent of the latest issuance of waivers nationwide, and the companies that won them didn’t have much in common with companies throughout the rest of the country that have received Obamacare waivers.

Other common waiver recipients were labor union chapters, large corporations, financial firms and local governments. But Pelosi’s district’s waivers are the first major examples of luxurious, gourmet restaurants and hotels getting a year-long pass from Obamacare." :ugh:
 
TinCanSailor said:
From the WashingtonTimes: "seven entire states and 1,372 businesses, unions and other institutions have received waivers from the law. The list includes the administration’s friends and allies and, of course, those who have the best lobbyists.

More than 50 percent of the Obamacare waiver beneficiaries are union members, which is striking because union members account for less than 12 percent of the American work force. The same unions that provided more than $120 million to Democrats in the last two elections and, in many cases, openly campaigned in favor of the government takeover of your health care, now celebrate that Obamacare is not their problem."

From the Daily Caller: "Of the 204 new Obamacare waivers President Barack Obama’s administration approved in April, 38 are for fancy eateries, hip nightclubs and decadent hotels in House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi’s Northern California district.

That’s in addition to the 27 new waivers for health care or drug companies and the 31 new union waivers Obama’s Department of Health and Human Services approved.

Pelosi’s district secured almost 20 percent of the latest issuance of waivers nationwide, and the companies that won them didn’t have much in common with companies throughout the rest of the country that have received Obamacare waivers.

Other common waiver recipients were labor union chapters, large corporations, financial firms and local governments. But Pelosi’s district’s waivers are the first major examples of luxurious, gourmet restaurants and hotels getting a year-long pass from Obamacare." :ugh:
Click to expand...
:ty:

so it's more like a dirty political favor rather than whatever kokonut's rambling on about.
 
Jiro said:
um... there's a difference between label and mockery.

I'm mocking Sowell by calling him a buffoon. You are labeling them as "leftist liberal". These are not insulting word. These are actual label.

so Steinhauer.... where did it say that they're leftist liberals?
Click to expand...

I said they are self described leftist liberals because it is a fact.

This might have given you a clue - as it did to anyone who knows what a leftist liberal is:

New Book by Amartya Sen: Peace and Democratic Society « ABC Democracy

but, I don't know - if it behooves you to think I am mocking those who criticize Sowell, I wasn't - I was pointing out they had political reasons for doing so.

But, at least you admitted you were the one using a label to mock. :ty:
 
Steinhauer said:
I said they are self described leftist liberals because it is a fact.
Click to expand...
where? says who?

Steinhauer said:
This might have given you a clue - as it did to anyone who knows what a leftist liberal is:

New Book by Amartya Sen: Peace and Democratic Society « ABC Democracy

but, I don't know - if it behooves you to think I am mocking those who criticize Sowell, I wasn't - I was pointing out they had political reasons for doing so.
Click to expand...
are they politically affiliated with Democratic Party or any leftist organization?

btw - you used the word "behoove" in a wrong way.

Steinhauer said:
But, at least you admitted you were the one using a label to mock. :ty:
Click to expand...
no I'm not labeling him. I'm mocking him. He's a buffoon. If I say he's an idiot, is that a label too? Don't be a jackass.
 
kokonut said:
Been saying that for the longest time. :wave:

Some people just didn't want to hear it.

:dunno:
Click to expand...

so you are admitting that it was more of political favor than Obamacare's shortcoming?
 
Jiro said:
so you are admitting that it was more of political favor than Obamacare's shortcoming?
Click to expand...
The shortcomings of Obamacare are the motivation for seeking the waiver; political favor grants the waiver.
 
Reba said:
The shortcomings of Obamacare are the motivation for seeking the waiver; political favor grants the waiver.
Click to expand...

there are waivers in everything from all administrations. so what kokonut is rambling on about is not a valid explanation for Obamacare's shortcoming.
 
Jiro said:
where? says who?


are they politically affiliated with Democratic Party or any leftist organization?

btw - you used the word "behoove" in a wrong way.


no I'm not labeling him. I'm mocking him. He's a buffoon. If I say he's an idiot, is that a label too? Don't be a jackass.
Click to expand...

Behoove was used the right way.

be·hoove/biˈho͞ov/

Verb:

1.It is a duty or responsibility for someone to do something; it is incumbent on: "it behooves any coach to study his predecessors".
2.It is appropriate or suitable; it befits: "it ill behooves the opposition constantly to decry the sale of arms to friendly countries".
Click to expand...

Did you think I was talking about horses? :giggle:

So, you were asking why I was not mocking, but rather, labelling Sowell's so called adversaries whom you claimed told him to STFU?

When it was made clear that I did not put the 'label" on them, but rather, they put the label on themseves, you asked where "it" said that when you originally asked why I was labelling them.

You started at point A, you are still at point A.


http://vocabulary-vocabulary.com/dictionary/behoove.php


Tips: Behoove is usually used in the sense of "something behooves…" meaning that something is fitting, proper, or prudent, given the circumstances. If it behooves you to do something, it means that doing it will benefit you in some way.
Click to expand...
 
Steinhauer said:
Behoove was used the right way.
Click to expand...
"behoove" is typically used positively, not negatively. You're using it negatively therefore it's a wrong term to use.

Steinhauer said:
Did you think I was talking about horses? :giggle:
Click to expand...
I didn't lol.

Steinhauer said:
So, you were asking why I was not mocking, but rather, labelling Sowell's so called adversaries whom you claimed told him to STFU?
Click to expand...
no that's not what I said and you're taking it too literally. You've already read what I wrote earlier so I don't need to repeat it. It's just simpler and funnier if I said STFU.

Steinhauer said:
When it was made clear that I did not put the 'label" on them, but rather, they put the label on themseves, you asked where "it" said that when you originally asked why I was labelling them.
Click to expand...
so where is "it"? Where did "it" say they're leftist liberal? I want to see where did they state their political affiliation or whatsoever.

Do you mean to tell me that you assumed they're leftist liberals based on their disagreement with Sowell?

Steinhauer said:
You started at point A, you are still at point A.
Click to expand...
I'm still at Point A because you're still giving me a direction to Point B and I'm like "DERP!"
 
Back
Top