What I am saying is, if an individual is at higher risk for such and such to happen--they should be told before the implant and let them make the choice themselves--if they want to risk or not is up to them.
Yes, but we were actually talking about different subject - we were talking about the fact how CIs are designed for people with sensori-neural loss, which does include some nerve damage, right?
Of course, I agree one can not have 100% nerve loss but if there is some nerve that is still working, chances are the implant will work, too.
So, logically, from that POV, the doctors are right, aren't they?
Now, the
separate subject is, whether or not the nerve damage is progressive, and how fast it is.
Do people should be told about this? Yes, I think they should,
but is a 15 years old capable of understanding such a complicate medical issue and more over, to make a decision for herself?
I doubt most of them can, and anyway usually the children until they reach maturity remain under their parent's responsibility.
It's the law. The parent's have to make the decision for them.
I was wondering why the rush in your case. I am guessing - perhaps exactly because of your losing the auditory nerves?...
Perhaps the doctors thought it will help you to learn as much sound and speech before you lose it more and more, and after that the brain "remembers".
Sorry it didn't work out for you.
Or maybe it did, maybe all what you can hear now is thanks to CI but unfortunately it came with unfortunate side effect (vertigo, and ??)..
Fuzzy