Casey Anthony found not guilty of her murder charge

Status
Not open for further replies.
deafskeptic said:
Also, it apparently was put there after she died.
Click to expand...

No, it was put there (according to forensic experts) while she was alive and was the murder weapon.

Remember, these experts included FBI forensic analysts and medical doctors.
 
I feel like duct-taping this thread and locking it in a trunk.
 
Reba said:
Yes, every child deserves to have a father and mother listed, even if the parents don't like it. However, not all states require it. Some states want the father to be named before the mother can get welfare.
Click to expand...

Yeah that way it'll help the law enforcement know who's the father and who's the mother of the child, etc. I'm sorry if anyone don't like it and it violates their rights, it's all part of keeping up with who is who than guessing who is who, as that would give a waste of time finding out who.
 
I say this. If a mother comes to the government (any level) for public assistance, she should be told, "Go ask the Daddy first." If the daddy is not known, "YOU GO FIND HIM, it's not our problem." For those whom use a donor, it is safe to say if they did not need the donor's support then they certainly don't need the government's.

If you can not feed them, don't breed them.
 
The world wanted to convict Anthony because they thought she was a bad mother.

Yet no one was paying attention to Anthony before her daughter died, so again, I say: I'm glad that the American justice system does not favor lynch mob mentality.
 
I'll also say this.

The DA is not finish with this. There are charges that the DA can, and probably will, bring against individual members of this family based on their testimonies
 
rolling7 said:
I say this. If a mother comes to the government (any level) for public assistance, she should be told, "Go ask the Daddy first." If the daddy is not known, "YOU GO FIND HIM, it's not our problem." For those whom use a donor, it is safe to say if they did not need the donor's support then they certainly don't need the government's.

If you can not feed them, don't breed them.
Click to expand...

Most states do this, but there are plenty (myself included) who aren't getting any public assistance and think it is very backwards and rude people have issues with not having my son's father on his b/c.

I'm thinking of all the things I've done in his life that would've required his signature:

1. School Enrollment.
2. Daycare enrollment.
3. Passport.
4. Name change issue (middle).
5. Travel.
6. Medical.
7. et freakin' cetera...

If the father doesn't want to be a father, then he shouldn't get those rights. By not having his name on there, I bypass 1000 steps when I handle these things. *shrug* Not going to apologize because some people on a message board think that their opinions of what is proper override my right to parent.
 
rolling7 said:
I'll also say this.

The DA is not finish with this. There are charges that the DA can, and probably will, bring against individual members of this family based on their testimonies
Click to expand...

They won't. There's no evidence that supports their testimony well enough to do so. The DA is done.
 
Steinhauer said:
No, it was put there (according to forensic experts) while she was alive and was the murder weapon.

Remember, these experts included FBI forensic analysts and medical doctors.
Click to expand...


Yet the prosecution was unable to prove what and who did this beyond a reasonable doubt. The burden of proof is upon them and they failed to provide it.
 
Reba said:
There is more evidence pointing towards smothering (duct tape) or chloroform (trace and internet search) than there is for drowning (no evidence), yet people keep mentioning the drowning scenario as though it were on a par with the murder scenario.
Click to expand...

Still not enough evidence to be beyond a reasonable doubt.
 
Steinhauer said:
The only evidence was a dead body with a skull covered with duct tape that had a heart shaped sticker and Casey Anthony's fingerprints on the tape (according to Leonard Padilla).

That all changed when the defense got ahold of the files ..... :hmm:

Also, the smell of a dead body from Casey Anthony's trunk as well as DNA evidence from Caylee.

What the hell was a child ever doing inside the trunk of a car?
Click to expand...

And that was not enough evidence to convict beyond a reasonable doubt. No matter how you try to twist it.

Smell does not prove murder, nor does the DNA. She was the child's mother. That DNA could have gotten there in any number of ways.
 
deafskeptic said:
Yet the prosecution was unable to prove what and who did this beyond a reasonable doubt. The burden of proof is upon them and they failed to provide it.
Click to expand...

Exactly. This was the prosecution's ball game, and they didn't hit a home run.
 
rolling7 said:
I say this. If a mother comes to the government (any level) for public assistance, she should be told, "Go ask the Daddy first." If the daddy is not known, "YOU GO FIND HIM, it's not our problem." For those whom use a donor, it is safe to say if they did not need the donor's support then they certainly don't need the government's.

If you can not feed them, don't breed them.
Click to expand...

Judge much? Everything is so black and white to you. Real life does not fall so neatly into your dichotomous categorization.
 
jillio said:
Still not enough evidence to be beyond a reasonable doubt.
Click to expand...
I never said that it was.

I simply said that there was more evidence to support a murder rather than an accidental drowning yet people give credence to the drowning theory.
 
You guys go ahead with your judgement and your arm chair quarterbacking. Fact: there was reasonable doubt and Anthony was not convicted as a result. Live with it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top