jillio
New Member
- Joined
- Jun 14, 2006
- Messages
- 60,232
- Reaction score
- 22
I read that this was offensive in "For Hearing People Only," a book on Deaf culture that I read in my ASL 1 class.
Here's a link on this forum to a discussion on the subject: http://www.alldeaf.com/general-chat/81464-hearing-impaired-offensive.html
And another: http://www.alldeaf.com/our-world-our-culture/63919-offensive.html
My understanding is that it focuses on the "impairment" the "can't" and not on the abilities and "cans" of the person in question. It focuses on what is missing instead of what is gained, as in Deaf Culture.
We have discussed this numerous times on the this forum. It also implies that one is broken and in need of fixing. An idea that if offensive to most. Just to be safe, I would never use the term when referring to anyone. It is, after all, a term coined by the hearing in an attempt to be more PC. It ended up being more offensive to the deaf than the terminology it was supposed to replace. It also smacks of an audist perspective.