California Proposition Eight - Ban on Same-Sex Marriage

Status
Not open for further replies.
Foxrac said:
Sure but your opinion isn't right to take our rights away, it means more nothing than being worth.

Again, you have NO rights to restrict our life, period.
Click to expand...

So ?
 
Wokamuka said:
My argument is not against heterosexuals. Your proof that U.S. government's issue against gay people is because of straight people is not a reason for me.

Why straight people think that a marriage must be between a man and a woman?
Click to expand...

In your case didn't you forget that male organ and female organ were created for each other, not the same? :hmm:

So hence therefore it only makes more sense to allow marriages for hetros only, not homos.
 
web730 said:
She isn't alone here.

In case you forgot that it were the majority voting the four-state ballots where it bans same sex marriage, not by religion institutions this time.

I think this thread should be moved to the closet forum, indeed. But that is the mod and/or thread creator's decision.
Click to expand...

Don't care about her.

This thread wouldn't fit in GLBT Lounge due not meet to LinuxGold's guideline and this thread need be locked for good, however it would fit in On-Topic section.
http://www.alldeaf.com/glbt-lounge/5051-respect-forum.html

Remember, there's no Closet section anymore, new name is GLBT Lounge section, it has changed in last few month ago.

I had seen your post about opinion on gay marriage, I rather not discuss with you.
 
web730 said:
Well, people have different views about the morality issues hence mine is different than yours. You and we shouldn't fail to notice the society's moral deprivation in last two decades.

Therefore We cannot afford to allow and allow them do so OR we shall be in a moral bankruptcy as a society which I dread to see it happen.
Click to expand...

Moral deprivation over the past 20 years? They're been saying that since the beginning of civilization and we're not all dead.

Gay people can be good parents and adopt kids. That would make more homes for needy kids available. I know a lesbian person who takes care of kids with her partner.

Giving special status to heterosexual relationships is insulting to all relationships because that gives the impression of gay people being less human. I won't want to have an official relationship of a type that is used as a tool to degrade good people who just happen to be gay.

There are also transgendered and intersexual people. It'd be interesting to see what the ban supporters would say about the latter, who are not clearly one way or other physically. Things are not always black or white.
 
web730 said:
In your case didn't you forget that male organ and female organ were created for each other, not the same? :hmm:

So hence therefore it only makes more sense to allow marriages for hetros only, not homos.
Click to expand...

So that would mean intersexual people can't marry anyone at all? :hmm:
 
Foxrac said:
Don't care about her.

This thread wouldn't fit in GLBT Lounge due not meet to LinuxGold's guideline and this thread need be locked for good, however it would fit in On-Topic section.
http://www.alldeaf.com/glbt-lounge/5051-respect-forum.html

Remember, there's no Closet section anymore, new name is GLBT Lounge section, it has changed in last few month ago.

I had seen your post about opinion on gay marriage, I rather not discuss with you.
Click to expand...

Okay no plm regarding your last paragraph, cool! At least you and others know where I stand on about the issue here.

Anyway, I couldn't remember its abbrev so I instead named it a closet forum. GLBT ok, tks! ;)
 
web730 said:
Okay no plm regarding your last paragraph, cool! At least you and others know where I stand on about the issue here.

Anyway, I couldn't remember its abbrev so I instead named it a closet forum. GLBT ok, tks! ;)
Click to expand...

Sure, thanks.

I rather to respect your opinion than being debate.
 
The actual point is that same sexes marrying doesn't make any sense and destroy the family morality. It also confuse our children as role models, too.

Not wise and good way to allow them (same sexes) marry that way. It is immorality!
Click to expand...
HAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
I'm immoral just b/c I happen to love someone who has the same body part "down South" as I do? That makes as much sense as saying interracial marriage is "immoral" Or.....even better.....it makes as much sense as saying that someone who's deaf and someone who's hearing's marriage is immoral.
I AM GAY. The ONLY difference between my feelings towards for example Hannah, and someone else's who's hetro feelings towards their husband or wife, is that Hannah and I happen to both possess the same down south body parts. The love is the SAME!!!!!
I wish so badly homophobes could have experianced what I did as a teen....and oh GAWD how confusing and scary that was. I still vividly remember lying in my bunk at my all girls camp, being all confused and freaked out about those feelings I was having towards my best friend. I remember thinking " OMG this feels awesome that I love my best friend....but aren't I supposed to be feeling this way towards GUYS?!?!"
And yes....it does fuck up traditional 1950's marriage roles....but since those kinds of marriage roles are unequal that's a GOOD THING!
And family means different things to different people you know. I consider Hannah's family as pretty much my own family, even though we're not related by blood. LOVE makes a family and LOVE makes a relationship!!!!!!!
 
PowerON said:
See #30 of this thread.
Click to expand...

"Natural" mean you think that learned behavior (like being polite or taking a shower once a month) is not natural?

Wooden table in your furniture is not natural. Wood should be, by nature, a tree. You become shocked?

Steel is not natural. You have a car? It is not natural. You become shocked?

Plastic is, obviously, not natural. You become shocked? You have anything with plastic?

You eat only organic? Finish you act silly. The answer proof there.

Natural, to you, mean all who are opposite sex can only marry because who told you?

Or "natural" mean you just don't like and, therefore, want to stop others not to be happy because you are not happy.
 
RedFox said:
Intersexual people are not physically solely male or solely female, with varying degrees of mixes of characteristics.
Click to expand...

Oh, I got it, thanks. Okay... :hmm:

wait... do ye mean physically only?
 
RedFox said:
Moral deprivation over the past 20 years? They're been saying that since the beginning of civilization and we're not all dead.

Gay people can be good parents and adopt kids. That would make more homes for needy kids available. I know a lesbian person who takes care of kids with her partner.

Giving special status to heterosexual relationships is insulting to all relationships because that gives the impression of gay people being less human. I won't want to have an official relationship of a type that is used as a tool to degrade good people who just happen to be gay.

There are also transgendered and intersexual people. It'd be interesting to see what the ban supporters would say about the latter, who are not clearly one way or other physically. Things are not always black or white.
Click to expand...

One of the foster homes I was in when I was a kid, my foster parents was a lesbian couple. They provided a very excellent and safe home for me and for many other foster children. I still keep in touch with them to this day. They also have two beautiful children of their own, as well.
 
Wokamuka said:
"Natural" mean you think that learned behavior (like being polite or taking a shower once a month) is not natural?

Wooden table in your furniture is not natural. Wood should be, by nature, a tree. You become shocked?

Steel is not natural. You have a car? It is not natural. You become shocked?

Plastic is, obviously, not natural. You become shocked? You have anything with plastic?

You eat only organic? Finish you act silly. The answer proof there.

Natural, to you, mean all who are opposite sex can only marry because who told you?

Or "natural" mean you just don't like and, therefore, want to stop others not to be happy because you are not happy.
Click to expand...

This is America, it's people's choice. People look at smoker puffing in mall, they think it's bother us. They complain to City of Hall. They argue and choke each other. Voting to make up to settle the rule, policy, law or whatever, we obey it.

If you're mad, go and argue with government, or try choking them and see if they're bring the attention to you. Don't waste your breath here in AD until your dream come true. *mocking* I have dream.... I see boy and girl hold hand together and banging and m-a-r-r-y-i-n-g and f-u-c-k-i-n-g in the house. la de la...
 
PowerON said:
This is America, it's people's choice. People look at smoker puffing in mall, they think it's bother us.[/quote}

Americans smoked because the tobacco industry (and the American governmnet said) it was fine,

I see boy and girl hold hand together and banging and m-a-r-r-y-i-n-g and f-u-c-k-i-n-g in the house. la de la...
Click to expand...

That's your dream. Obvious. You dream everyone same as you and not be American.
Click to expand...
 
what's ironic about California is liberial state, but banned gay marriage.
 
intersexual means that their genitialia is ambigious....that is their genitials don't fit clearly into male or female classifications.
Also, what about people with sex chromosome unusualities like XXX or X (Turner's Syndrome) or XYY or whatever?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top