- Joined
- Sep 14, 2006
- Messages
- 14,491
- Reaction score
- 2
Nice, huh? A million-dollar home, and they had to smell their own trash burning.
Perhaps not. How big was the place? It's described as a mansion.
Nice, huh? A million-dollar home, and they had to smell their own trash burning.
The decision by President Barack Obama to launch the assault that killed Osama bin Laden was one of the "gutsiest" calls by any president in recent memory, Obama's top counterterrorism adviser said Monday.
John Brennan, assistant to the president for homeland security and counterterrorism, said that despite intelligence indicating that bin Laden was in the compound in Pakistan, there was no certainty the al Qaeda leader was actually there.
Obama "made what I believe was one of the ... gutsiest calls of any president in recent memory," Brennan said.
'Gutsy' call led to bin Laden killing, Obama adviser says - CNN.com
That solider - I could imagine have a very cranky expression on his face when he stormed in and killed him. But he knew, it was all worth it.heard from FB -
1. Osama bin Laden died on same day as Hitler 66 years ago
2. The soldier who killed Osama bin Laden is from Brooklyn
weird huh?
Maybe it was an early news flash before the details came out. Obviously it was wrong.
Part of his "staff"....
for old times' sake.
I think Carmen Sandeigo is better.
You thought that intelligence was (mostly or entirely) analyzed by Obama's staff. That is not correct. Obama's staff are his political appointees. The non-political, career professionals at State, CIA and NSA do nearly all of the analyzing.
Obama's staff, and Obama himself of course, decide what to do about it. They make the political decisions.
Why we keep having to go back to elementary facts is because you do not understand what you're talking about in terms of how the government works.
Perhaps not. How big was the place? It's described as a mansion.
Bin Laden’s massive, highly secure compound was at the end of a narrow dirt road and about eight times larger than other homes in the area. It had no telephone or Internet connections.
Imagine McCain and Palin doing this? Not so much.
And they present their finding to whom?
And who makes the decisions based on the findings that have been presented?
Some people make it sound like Obama has no part in decision making. He nixed the idea of simply bombing the compound because of the risk of collateral damage.
Just can't stand that he is being praised, can you?
I would expect his minions to praise him.
I gave him credit for a few things. I can't think of anyone that wouldn't have done the same thing. If he bombs the compound there is doubt and it could be embarrassing. If he doesn't do anything, and it gets out (wikileaks,pissed NSA/CIA), he is a one term President. Going in boots on the ground was his only good option.
He deserves credit for continuing the hunt.
I would expect his minions to praise him.
I gave him credit for a few things. I can't think of anyone that wouldn't have done the same thing. If he bombs the compound there is doubt and it could be embarrassing. If he doesn't do anything, and it gets out (wikileaks,pissed NSA/CIA), he is a one term President. Going in boots on the ground was his only good option.
He deserves credit for continuing the hunt.
And they present their finding to whom?
And who makes the decisions based on the findings that have been presented?
according to link I posted