- Joined
- Jun 8, 2004
- Messages
- 54,899
- Reaction score
- 1,518
I don't know. I'm too emotionally rattled to think about it.I was just kidding about the helmet. It is a good question, but one has to ask, did the tendency really change?
I don't know. I'm too emotionally rattled to think about it.I was just kidding about the helmet. It is a good question, but one has to ask, did the tendency really change?
I don't know. I'm too emotionally rattled to think about it.
That would have more to do with activation centers in the brain and decreased functioning of particular synapses, not actual brain volume. Although chronic, severe, intractable depression has been linked to an overall reduction in gray matter particularly in the prefrontal cortex.
Of course not, but I wouldn't immediately dismiss it out of hand, either.
I wouldn't either. I considered it for 10 seconds and then dismissed it.
It really sounds absurd to me. It makes more sense that people's political choices are based on what they perceive to be in their best interest or the interest of they group(s) they consider themselves to be part of. As well as their religious beliefs or secular values. The cultural soup that they are a part of is a more likely predictor of political orientation, in my opinion.
Fair enough, but it is just one single study that needs to be confirmed by further study. I wouldn't put a lot of weight on it.
I wouldn't either. I considered it for 10 seconds and then dismissed it.
It really sounds absurd to me. It makes more sense that people's political choices are based on what they perceive to be in their best interest or the interest of they group(s) they consider themselves to be part of. As well as their religious beliefs or secular values. The cultural soup that they are a part of is a more likely predictor of political orientation, in my opinion.
What does this mean about the brains of people in other countries that don't have a two-party system?
"The Liberal Mind: The Psychological Causes of Political Madness"
Lyle H. Rossiter Jr., M.D.
That strategy works both ways.
What does this mean about the brains of people in other countries that don't have a two-party system?
What does this mean about the brains of people in other countries that don't have a two-party system?
I'm not familiar with your guy but even a cursory glance at his work makes me wonder if he's a creditable source in his field.
My guess is that he may be even less respected than Dr Phil on TV. I can see a lot of flaws in his thinking even in a brief glance at his excerpt.
I'm afraid that strategy only works with creditable sources and I'm pretty sure your man isn't one of them.
It means their politics will be a mess, but their arts, architecture, music and fashion will be exquisite.
Like Italy, for example. Or Brazil.
Or they could be like the Soviet Union. :P
I'm asking about their political orientation. What if their country isn't divided into two political parties but into several? Or they have only one party? Or they have no parties?The same thing. These differences are related to different types of cognition and information processing. Just because this study related it to politcal orientation doesn't mean that it doesn't occur in other applications as well. In fact, it does occur in many other applications. But you must admit, that someone's political orientation is directly bound to the way they think and perceive information. So it was a natural application.
It means their politics will be a mess, but their arts, architecture, music and fashion will be exquisite.
Like Italy, for example. Or Brazil.
I'm asking about their political orientation. What if their country isn't divided into two political parties but into several? Or they have only one party? Or they have no parties?