- Joined
- Aug 7, 2008
- Messages
- 4,335
- Reaction score
- 5
People can probably acheive a higher level of happiness is they don't have to go against what is more natural and easiest for them.
BINGO.
Why not make it easier for them in the long run?
People can probably acheive a higher level of happiness is they don't have to go against what is more natural and easiest for them.
The point of the story was that my "cousin" HAS choices because he is comfortable with hearing people too. He still wants to go to Duke. But that is just it, he can pick either Duke or Gallaudet. If he was not as comfortable with hearing people, would he even think about Duke?
BINGO.
Why not make it easier for them in the long run?
I think you missed the point of Bott's post.
I think you missed the point of Bott's post.
It's okay. I felt really loved that everyone agreed. :P
No I just used her statement to make my point.
Ug... anyway.
I gotta go to bed. I leave with one last question. Several orally raised people here on AD complain about their upbringing or at least wished they knew ASL earlier. I ask one question: Would you be willing to lose some of your speech/lipreading proficiency?
Ug... anyway.
I gotta go to bed. I leave with one last question. Several orally raised people here on AD complain about their upbringing or at least wished they knew ASL earlier. I ask one question: Would you be willing to lose some of your speech/lipreading proficiency?
Why in the world do you think that one must be sacrificed for the other?
Daredevil....I think that you're operating under the assumption that deaf school/programs equal no speech therapy. That's a myth. Only a very small percentage of Deaf are ASL only. The gross majority have intensive speech training.ASL is a wonderful language for the deaf, but it seems to me that once school's over, some of them get frustrated and it's too late to do anything since they are adults now.
Daredevil....I think that you're operating under the assumption that deaf school/programs equal no speech therapy. That's a myth. Only a very small percentage of Deaf are ASL only. The gross majority have intensive speech training.
That's exactly why I made this thread. It's not that deaf school don't have speech therapy. It's the difference in intensity. I want to know if people think intensity makes a difference or not. Or perhaps a better wording is "Is minimum speech therapy enough?" or "Is intense speech therapy (or daily interaction with speaking people) not worth it at all due to wasting the child's time?"
ASL does not cause people to not speak. Like I have posted many, many, times. I have seen several people that grew up with ASL and speak wonderfully!
Met a DPN leader, with a deaf Family that speaks wonderfully! Met several deaf people, and deaf leaders. That speaks wonderfully, and grew up in an ASL environment. Go figure???
Given the fact that 90% of deaf children are born to hearing parents, and have extended families that are hearing, not to mention neighbors and playmates, interaction with hearing people is not something that needs to be contrived. It is a part of daily life.
Repetitive small talk is a form of speech therapy?
The best form. And I brought it up because you mentioned "daily interaction with hearing people" just a couple of posts ago.