Baby No. 17 For Duggars Coming Soon

There's one deaf couple who have 10 children. The wife is deaf and her husband is hearin'. Her husband is very supportive. He always wanted to have a LARGE family since he is Irish and came from a large family himself. I don't see anythin' wrong with havin' more children as long as mother is healthy to have a child.
 
As long as they support the children with their own money then keep on going!!! If they start applying for financial support from the taxpayers, then I will have a problem.
 
Why? If they're all truly one big happy family, then kudos to them! ;)

Angel's post

Why?.. Some parents just love having more children, and I don't see a problem with that as long as the children are well taken care of, being feed, roof over their heads and being loved by their parents, that's all they really need, beside the children look quite happy in the picture...

Answer to your question:

See those link, I provided here as I quoted Opal's post.

To my opinion: Stop to breeding more children and adopt or foster the children from poor countries and homeless... If they really love to have a lot of children then adopt or foster the children from poor countries... Why can't they? Look at poor children who need loving home. If I am well off then I would love to adopt or foster the children from poor countries and employ nanny and maids to take care of my children instead of get my children to raise my babies for me. It's my responsible, not their. If I can't acheive to take care of my babies then employ Nanny and maids.

To my viewpoint, they don't parents their children but put responsiblity burden on their children. What they did is not normal healthy family. It's parental's responsible if they really want to have more babies then is their responsible, not push their responsiblities to their children. I feel sorry for the oldest children who raise their youngest siblings. What kind of childhood they are having???? As I know that they are well off then employ Nanny and maids then... Why can't they? All what I see is they make all their children to do work for them.

The children need to be able to experience their LIFE and not just belief.

Yes I feel sorry for these children who are getting no exposure to the real world! There's much more life than the Bible. It's really sad that the children only knows many childbirths.

I've read their websites in the past and feel something creepy about the whole thing. Sure, the children may seem happy but they will have difficult time how to socialize with anyone outside of their parent's household. I see no problem that the children make their own chores but they do all of the cooking, cleaning, laundry, and taking care of the other children. I think that it is important for the children to learn right and wrong and let them allow to make their own mistakes from time to time and also learn to hear the views to cons/pros, too. They are not allow to play with their friends and their own childhood. The teenagers who have puberty should have their own privacy instead of share a bedroom with other siblings.

All what I have my opinion and hope Michelle's safe and healthy pregnancy.
 
I understand and respect your opinion on this Liebling ....
 
True. One family I know just has had their 12th child. Their children beg their Mother not to get pregnant again because they are ashamed to come from a large family....
Maybe some of the kids are ashamed because of society's attitude. Notice some of the posters in this thread mocking and criticizing the family. It's the mockers and criticizers, not the actions of the parents, who put shame on the kids. If people would mind their own business, the kids would probably be fine with their large family.
 
Why should I congrats them then? *shake my head*
You don't need to congratulate them. You don't even know them.


All what I want to say is I feel sorry for their children.
Why do you feel sorry for them? Are they sad, sick, suffering? Their children seem healthy and happy to me.
 
Wow, too bad we are not in China.
Hmm . . . :hmm: . . . That would mean that everyone here at AD who was not the first born child in the family would never exist. Each ADer here would be limited to one child. It would mean the government decided which babies could live.

Do you really want that?
 
LOL @ Reba's post...you're funni and to the point!!
 
...If I am well off then I would love to adopt or foster the children from poor countries and employ nanny and maids to take care of my children instead of get my children to raise my babies for me. It's my responsible, not their. If I can't acheive to take care of my babies then employ Nanny and maids.
A hired stranger is a better caregiver for children then their own siblings? :cold:


... What they did is not normal healthy family.
How so? What evidence is there that the family isn't healthy?


... I feel sorry for the oldest children who raise their youngest siblings.
Have the older children complained, or look sad or depressed?


... As I know that they are well off then employ Nanny and maids then... Why can't they?
Why should they? The family is satisfied with their current arrangement. Why would they want to hire strangers into their home?


All what I see is they make all their children to do work for them.
Lots of families, especially farm families do that all the time, and have done that since ancient times. It's no big deal.


The children need to be able to experience their LIFE and not just belief.
That's exactly what they're doing.


Yes I feel sorry for these children who are getting no exposure to the real world!
Like what are they missing out on? Should they take a field trip to Skid Row, an abortion clinic, a XXX movie theater, the local jail, what? I think they'll have plenty of years left after they leave home to experience as much of the nasty world as they want.
 
Last edited:
Thank God that we have homosexual people as they help to put stop overpopulation. :cheers:
 
Hmm . . . :hmm: . . . That would mean that everyone here at AD who was not the first born child in the family would never exist. Each ADer here would be limited to one child. It would mean the government decided which babies could live.

Do you really want that?

In China, they do not kill those babies. They punish people for having more kids because they have no more land for more and more people. Think about it in not so far futue. OUr country would end up alike them, not enough land to hold all those people and feed them all plus rest of world we are taking care of them also.

Do I really want that? Umm if it would saved them from burning in hell if they choose not to believe in Jesus Christ, then I would say yes to our government making the decision.
 
Huh???? Not true, many them have kids already.

I m saying that gays people contribute to lessen the rate of births. Most of the time gays people adopt the rejected children. Got it ?
 
A hired stranger is a better caregiver for children then their own siblings? :cold:


You use your children as caregiver to their own siblings :cold: Remember, that professional maids and Nannies are not same thing as babysitters...


How so? What evidence is there that the family isn't healthy?

Have the older children complained, or look sad or depressed?

Why should I repeat? You know my debate posts with you (see the link, I provided toward Opal's post yesterday). :dizzy:

Why should they? The family is satisfied with their current arrangement. Why would they want to hire strangers into their home?

wow interesting, this come from you... :eek3: You use your children as caregiver... To me, LEAVE children alone to enjoy their childhood... It's my responsible to take care of my babies... If I have no money to acheive family life then have 2 or 3 children... If I have money then adopt or foster poor children from homeless or ophan homes because they need loving home. A lot of rich people hire proffesional maids and Nannies...


Lots of families, especially farm families do that all the time, and have done that since ancient times. It's no big deal.

:jaw: you don't see deal but I collect experiences from my friends who experienced from a big family and work at farm... They hurried up to get married and leave home to live their own...


That's exactly what they're doing.

I don't see it.



Like what are they missing out on? Should they take a field trip to Skid Row, an abortion clinic, a XXX movie theater, the local jail, what? I think they'll have plenty of years left after they leave home to experience as much of the nasty world as they want.

What you said here is too extreme and twist... Why do you always put negative instead of positive examples to post here when you knew very well that nobody do like that. Do you really think that the parents exposure their children like this...then prove me... Can you provide me the example links to show me where the parents take their children to negative trips like what you stated here... ?
 
Last edited:
In China, they do not kill those babies.
They do forced abortions on late third trimester moms. That kills the babies. Also, their policy encourages parents who have a daughter as their only child, to kill or abandon the baby so they can be allowed a chance to have a son. That's killing babies.


Do I really want that? Umm if it would saved them from burning in hell if they choose not to believe in Jesus Christ, then I would say yes to our government making the decision.
Do you really trust the government with that decision? Do you really want them interfering in and controlling your life and family that way?
 
Back
Top