Green;
Yes, I would be willing to engage in a discussion of majority-to-minority rudeness. Although the statement would be more toward the CURRENT discrimination by race. Historically, I do not think the theory applies. And I never said WHITE people are rude by nature. I suspect people are prone to be inconsiderate of what they fear. I would be interested, engaged, and happy to have this discussion with your proverbial 'room of people.' PROVIDED ONLY that the people I talked to were interested in discourse. I have, in fact, HAD this discussion with many AA friends -- granted, not a room of 50-100; discussions are harder that way (without a really skilled facilitator). I suppose I have no understanding at all of why you would think I SHOULDN'T be willing?!!
And, to be frank, I have no goal of "winning points." I'm not living a video game or a popularity contest. I am a curious, thinking, questioning person. I enjoy wrestling with tough, even uncomfortable, questions. I do not think there is any other way to grow and learn and improve.
Moreover, I am getting the distinct feeling that the statement "I do not agree" is either 1) some sort of insult in Deaf culture that I do not know about or 2) some sort of insult within the subculture of this forum that I was unaware of or 3) some unfortunate change in the greater culture as a whole wherein people no longer know how to discuss differences of opinion. (I have actually been thinking about #3 for a while in relativity to social media. I have yet to come to any conclusions. But I have had some awesome and enlightening conversations with people who think said theory unfounded.) Regardless of which, I find this all very sad. I am profoundly disappointed. I would be utterly bored if everyone agreed with me and me with them all the time. To me, that seems akin to torture!
Anyway, I have obviously upset people by:
a) asking for clarification and data behind a statement that was posed as statistical fact.
b) disagreeing that said data supported the conclusions
and c) therefore concluding insufficient evidence to NOT reject the NULL hypothesis.
The scientist in me is completely baffled. I am sorry you are offended. I am not sorry for the difference of opinion. However, I think it is best that I, sadly, leave you to your "venting." If anyone is ACTUALLY open to discussion and exploration of ideas and culture, please kindly invite me to a different string of posts.
Yes, I would be willing to engage in a discussion of majority-to-minority rudeness. Although the statement would be more toward the CURRENT discrimination by race. Historically, I do not think the theory applies. And I never said WHITE people are rude by nature. I suspect people are prone to be inconsiderate of what they fear. I would be interested, engaged, and happy to have this discussion with your proverbial 'room of people.' PROVIDED ONLY that the people I talked to were interested in discourse. I have, in fact, HAD this discussion with many AA friends -- granted, not a room of 50-100; discussions are harder that way (without a really skilled facilitator). I suppose I have no understanding at all of why you would think I SHOULDN'T be willing?!!
And, to be frank, I have no goal of "winning points." I'm not living a video game or a popularity contest. I am a curious, thinking, questioning person. I enjoy wrestling with tough, even uncomfortable, questions. I do not think there is any other way to grow and learn and improve.
Moreover, I am getting the distinct feeling that the statement "I do not agree" is either 1) some sort of insult in Deaf culture that I do not know about or 2) some sort of insult within the subculture of this forum that I was unaware of or 3) some unfortunate change in the greater culture as a whole wherein people no longer know how to discuss differences of opinion. (I have actually been thinking about #3 for a while in relativity to social media. I have yet to come to any conclusions. But I have had some awesome and enlightening conversations with people who think said theory unfounded.) Regardless of which, I find this all very sad. I am profoundly disappointed. I would be utterly bored if everyone agreed with me and me with them all the time. To me, that seems akin to torture!
Anyway, I have obviously upset people by:
a) asking for clarification and data behind a statement that was posed as statistical fact.
b) disagreeing that said data supported the conclusions
and c) therefore concluding insufficient evidence to NOT reject the NULL hypothesis.
The scientist in me is completely baffled. I am sorry you are offended. I am not sorry for the difference of opinion. However, I think it is best that I, sadly, leave you to your "venting." If anyone is ACTUALLY open to discussion and exploration of ideas and culture, please kindly invite me to a different string of posts.