Secretblend
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 10, 2007
- Messages
- 4,824
- Reaction score
- 121
It would be nice if I could actually have a debate with someone who doesn't contradict their own argument.
Same here! Why don't you quit doing that?
It would be nice if I could actually have a debate with someone who doesn't contradict their own argument.
Both Jiro and Secretblend make good point.
If texting in car is banned then how does people need utilize the GPS on cell phone to receive any information and make others considered them as usage of texting.
Texting ban law is joke, it never solve the problem.
If people can't use GPS, too bad. We didn't have GPS 20 years ago (for vehicles) yet we still survived.
I don't know what you are asking from me. You can simply leave the thread at any time.
If people can't use GPS, too bad. We didn't have GPS 20 years ago (for vehicles) yet we still survived.
because of GPS - we traveled further than before... to go where no man & woman has gone before.
It would be nice if I could actually have a debate with someone who doesn't contradict their own argument.
If you are asking that question, why don't you think there should be a law to ban texting?
First you say there shouldn't be a law. Now you say that flip could severely injure or kill someone because he learned about the dangers of texting after the fact (i.e. having a slight accident).
Flip didn't kill or hurt anyone, so your question is irrelevant.
Aside from that, you are contradicting your own argument.
That's an interesting argument since people have been able to travel across the country or around the world 20 years ago without GPS. Your point?
You have no rights to dictate our life and you need this law because you need special thing to protect your life due blind. :roll:
Your post doesn't make sense.
Foxrac,
My blindness has nothing to do with this and I don't need anything "special" to protect me, thank you very much.
As to whether or not my post makes sense, that is your interpretation and an incorrect one at that.
really? with this many people? Again - this is not relevant to this thread. You can create another thread about car technology and old time.
No, I don't have respect for you anymore because your opinion about usage of cell phone is ill informed and you are very confused person.
Let take argument out of thread, as Jolie said.
I believe in laws and you don't. That's all this comes down to. It is not a matter of me being confused or ill informed. Just because I support a national law to ban texting does not mean I am any more confused than someone who doesn't.
so the laws will guarantee how someone will behave behind the wheel?
so the laws will guarantee how someone will behave behind the wheel?
Believe it or not Jiro, some people who are arrested actually learn their lesson.
Believe it or not Jiro, some people who are arrested actually learn their lesson.
so do you prefer having more idiots with poor driver education on the road and keep arresting them? a cycle that never ends except statistic keeps rising? Is that what you want? Keep making more laws and arresting more of them while more victims are dying?
that's a pretty good idea. more profits for private prisons... meaning a higher rate employments
Did you ever stop and consider the fact that there are plenty of idiot drivers who received extensive driver's education yet they still drive like idiots?