Americans still texting while driving despite bans

Status
Not open for further replies.
It would be nice if I could actually have a debate with someone who doesn't contradict their own argument.

Same here! Why don't you quit doing that?
 
Both Jiro and Secretblend make good point.

If texting in car is banned then how does people need utilize the GPS on cell phone to receive any information and make others considered them as usage of texting.

Texting ban law is joke, it never solve the problem.

If people can't use GPS, too bad. We didn't have GPS 20 years ago (for vehicles) yet we still survived.
 
If people can't use GPS, too bad. We didn't have GPS 20 years ago (for vehicles) yet we still survived.

because of GPS - we traveled further than before... to go where no man & woman has gone before.
 
If people can't use GPS, too bad. We didn't have GPS 20 years ago (for vehicles) yet we still survived.

You have no rights to dictate our life and you need this law because you need special thing to protect your life due blind. :roll:

Your post doesn't make sense.
 
because of GPS - we traveled further than before... to go where no man & woman has gone before.

That's an interesting argument since people have been able to travel across the country or around the world 20 years ago without GPS. Your point?
 
It would be nice if I could actually have a debate with someone who doesn't contradict their own argument.

ah about that - here's what you're confused about. I forgot to reply to your previous post.

If you are asking that question, why don't you think there should be a law to ban texting?

First you say there shouldn't be a law. Now you say that flip could severely injure or kill someone because he learned about the dangers of texting after the fact (i.e. having a slight accident).

Flip didn't kill or hurt anyone, so your question is irrelevant.

Aside from that, you are contradicting your own argument.

I never said this text ban law shouldn't exist. I said this kind of approach is wrong. It doesn't solve anything. My question is not irrelevant at all because what if people did same as what flip did but the result is different since you said - "I wish other people would follow your example." What if the people hit the people instead of bump? That is vehicular manslaughter for that driver and a coffin for victim's family.

Your comment implies that you're ok with people learning from it by making mistake... called ACCIDENT... which COULD be a person. I prefer a SAFER way - the similar way that German driver education teaches to their students thus has a much safer driving record than Americans.
 
That's an interesting argument since people have been able to travel across the country or around the world 20 years ago without GPS. Your point?

really? with this many people? Again - this is not relevant to this thread. You can create another thread about car technology and old time.
 
You have no rights to dictate our life and you need this law because you need special thing to protect your life due blind. :roll:

Your post doesn't make sense.

Foxrac,

My blindness has nothing to do with this and I don't need anything "special" to protect me, thank you very much.

As to whether or not my post makes sense, that is your interpretation and an incorrect one at that.
 
Allright Guys -

I think that's enough for the time being. Let's cool it down and please get back on topic as I've stated earlier in this thread.

Consider this as a warning and please keep the belitting/personal attack to yourself instead of taking it out on someone else.

Thank You.
 
Foxrac,

My blindness has nothing to do with this and I don't need anything "special" to protect me, thank you very much.

As to whether or not my post makes sense, that is your interpretation and an incorrect one at that.

No, I don't have respect for you anymore because your opinion about usage of cell phone is ill informed and you are very confused person.

Let take argument out of thread, as Jolie said.
 
really? with this many people? Again - this is not relevant to this thread. You can create another thread about car technology and old time.

You were the one who refuted using technology to block cell phone access. That's how this whole discussion began.
 
No, I don't have respect for you anymore because your opinion about usage of cell phone is ill informed and you are very confused person.

Let take argument out of thread, as Jolie said.

I believe in laws and you don't. That's all this comes down to. It is not a matter of me being confused or ill informed. Just because I support a national law to ban texting does not mean I am any more confused than someone who doesn't.
 
I believe in laws and you don't. That's all this comes down to. It is not a matter of me being confused or ill informed. Just because I support a national law to ban texting does not mean I am any more confused than someone who doesn't.

so the laws will guarantee how someone will behave behind the wheel?
 
Believe it or not Jiro, some people who are arrested actually learn their lesson.

so do you prefer having more idiots with poor driver education on the road and keep arresting them? a cycle that never ends except statistic keeps rising? Is that what you want? Keep making more laws and arresting more of them while more victims are dying?

that's a pretty good idea. more profits for private prisons... meaning a higher rate employments
 
so do you prefer having more idiots with poor driver education on the road and keep arresting them? a cycle that never ends except statistic keeps rising? Is that what you want? Keep making more laws and arresting more of them while more victims are dying?

that's a pretty good idea. more profits for private prisons... meaning a higher rate employments

Did you ever stop and consider the fact that there are plenty of idiot drivers who received extensive driver's education yet they still drive like idiots?
 
Did you ever stop and consider the fact that there are plenty of idiot drivers who received extensive driver's education yet they still drive like idiots?

do you have a source to back that statement? btw - you have not answered my question.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top